Exam 3 Flashcards
Service quality is hard to maintain because:
- Subjective standards used by customers
- “Defect” in a service product has a much broader meaning
- Impossibility of inspecting a service before delivering it
- Human involvement à greater variability in output
- Challenge of supervising a large army of frontline servers scattered in 100s of service facilities located close to customers
- Ignorance about true cost of lack of quality
Why does “defect” in a service-product have a much broader meaning than in a physical product?
The process and outcome are both being evaluated. Technically accurate service but the customer gets annoyed or miffed.
What are the internal costs of poor service quality or service failures?
· Rework (i.e. mistake in bank statement)
· Facility downtime (i.e. spilled drink on a patron or a burned steak)
· Loss of morale (due to poor work atmosphere)
· Higher employee turnover rate (which puts:
o Added burden on the existing employees to train new ones and
o May lead to poor pool of recruits by discouraging good candidates)
What are the external costs of poor service quality or service failure?
· Type 1: Verifiable failure costs
o Guarantee costs
- (i.e. good night’s sleep or your money back; airlines – denied boarding compensation)
- Note: service à intangible à verifiable failure costs tend to be much lower than tangible products (no scrap pile); you don’t get a refund if you don’t like the play
o Lost future profit stream from lost customers
· Type 2: Non-verifiable costs (to customers)
o Customer’s out-of-pocket expenses
o Customer’s time
o Emotional costs/aggravation
· Type 3: Recovery costs: To compensate for service quality lapses (usually) before the end of a service encounter and prior to the loss of a customer
Understand problems in measuring costs of poor quality.
- Intangibility
- Lack of error data
- Low priority on resources required to install a quality-cost measurement system
- Design of traditional accounting systems
To measure the cost of inadequate quality, what information is needed?
Information needed:
· What actually happened in an encounter
· How employees and customers felt after the incident
· Subsequent action on the part of the
o Employees à staying on the job? Morale high?
o Customers à repeating their purchases?
· Recovery costs
How is the information obtained to measure the cost of inadequate quality?
Obtaining the information:
- Service events:
- Mystery shoppers
- Service perception measurement:
- Subsequent customer actions:
What are some of the internal measures of service quality?
Internal measures are designed to provide objective measures of the firm’s performance: on-time rate, order fill rate, service rate
What are the strengths and weaknesses of the internal measures of service quality?
Strengths:
·
Weaknesses
· Firm’s viewpoint, not customers
· Exceeding on some internal measures may not be important to customers (i.e. if you serve food quickly, that may not matter to the customer because they wanted to sit and have drinks)
· Fails to measure customers’ experiences
What are some customer measures of service quality?
Opinions and attitudes of customers
the causes of various gaps in Service Quality Gap Model
· Gap 1: the difference between what consumers expect of a service and what management perceives that consumers expect (what you expect vs what I think you expect)
· Gap 2: the difference between what management perceives and what consumers expect and the quality specifications set for service delivery
· Gap 3: the difference between the quality specifications set for service delivery and the actual quality of service delivery
· Gap 4: the difference between the actual quality of service delivery and the quality of service delivery described in the firm’s external communications
· Gap 5: the difference between customers’ expectations of service and their perception of the service actually delivered
Understand the four properties of numbers and how these relate to the measures of central tendency.
· Nominal property: place holders (i.e. male = 1, female = 2)
o Cannot do the average
· Ordinal property: the larger the number the greater the property
o It conveys order, however, difference in numbers (ranks) is not meaningful (it says nothing about the difference of academic achievement between the two ranks – the difference between a junior and a sophomore (3-2) does not equal the achievement difference between a senior and a junior (4-3))
o Can do the mode or the median
· Interval: the intervals between numbers are meaningful with respect to the attribute being measured
o The differences (but not absolute numbers) can be compared – i.e. differences between “1” and “2” and “3”; also the difference between “2” and “4” is twice the difference between “1” and “2”
o We cannot compare the absolute magnitude of the numbers because in an interval scale the zero point is established arbitrarily
o Biggest mistake in surveys: the descriptors do not create equal-appearing intervals (Poor, Satisfactory, Very satisfactory, Excellent)
· Ratio property: many attributes possess natural or absolute zero
o Can compare absolute magnitude and can compare intervals, rank objects according to magnitude or use the numbers to identify the objects
o Geometric mean, arithmetic mean, median, and mode are all legitimate measures
o Note: each higher order property subsumes all lower order properties
How does reliability of a measure differ from its validity?
You can be reliable without being valid but cannot be valid without being reliable – thus a valid instrument is reliable, but a reliable instrument may not be valid.
Reliability
Reliability attempts to answer the question: is this instrument/measure consistent? If an object/concept/construct is being measured repeatedly, and assuming that it has not changed from one measurement to the next, a reliable measure will provide the same response
- Ex: a reliable thermometer will record the same ambient temp, assuming the temp does not change
Validity
Validity attempts to answer the question: is this instrument/measure measuring what it is supposed to measure?
- Ex: can an ability to throw stones be a measure of one’s intelligence?