Exam 3 Flashcards
L15. List and briefly explain four mechanisms by which an organism/species could acquire “new” protein coding genes.
- Mutation: single base changes, insertions, or deletions in the protein coding region of a gene.
- Gene duplication (and divergence by mutation): the duplication of a protein-encoding gene through
unequal-crossing over, and subsequent divergence through the accumulation of genetic changes
(mutations). - Exon/domain duplication: the duplication of a one or more exons (with intevening introns) in a
protein-encoding gene through unequal-crossing over, and subsequent divergence through the
accumulation of genetic changes (mutations). - Exon/domain shuffling: the shuffling of one or more exons from one gene to the next through the
mobilization of transposons. - Horizontal gene transfer: the transfer of a protein coding region from one organism to another
L15. What is a “pseudogene,” and how might pseudogenes arise? What features of a normal gene would you expect a pseudogene to include? What distinguishes a pseudogene from
a “real” gene?
A pseudogene is a copy of a functional gene (ie protein coding gene) that no longer codes for a functional product, usually because it contains multiple stop-codons, insertions, and or
deletions. If generated by a gene duplication/divergence, a pseudogene might be expected to
contain a similar array of exons and introns as found in its functional counterpart. It may also
include any upstream/downstream control elements of sequences (promoters, polyA signals, etc)…
but it may not, depending on the extent of the duplication.
So, why do pseudogenes contain multiple genetic lesions, while the “normal” gene does not?
What keeps stop codons from accumulating in the “normal” functional copy of the gene?
L15. Some pseudogenes in eukaryotes include introns, just as their normal, functional counterparts.
However, many (most?!) mammalian pseudogenes lack introns found in their related functional
genes, and most of these include a poly A region near their 3’ end (sense strand). Propose a
mechanism by which such a “processed” pseudogene might be created. Would you expect
processed pseudogenes to be expressed in the same cells as its “normal” counterpart? Why or
why not?
“Processed” pseudogenes are thought to have arisen by reverse-transcription of a mRNA…
and subsequent insertion of the “cDNA” into the cellular genome, in a manner very similar to the
transposition of a retrotransposon. Thus, the processed pseudogene would lack introns, and might
include a “poly-A tail” (which is not normally coded by the genome).
It is unlikely that processed pseudogenes would be expressed in a normal manner, since the
retrotransposition process would not include the promoter and other control elements. It is possible
that a processed pseudogene might be expressed in some tissues, if it was inserted downstream of
another promoter
What is the difference between “germ-line” and “somatic cells?
The term “somatic” or “somatic cells” refer to cells of the body, while “germ-line” cells are
those that will contribute to the next generation: ie, reproductive cells such as sperm, eggs, and
their precursors.
L15. Transposable elements such as Alu, L1, and SVA, are scattered throughout the human
genome, and recent studies suggest that transposition occurs as frequently as ~1/20 live births. If
a transposable element jumped into an important gene in one of your cells when you were a baby
and caused a disease, is it likely that YOUR child would also have the disease? Briefly explain.
No, unless the transposon “hopped” into a gene in your germ-line [which likely would not
cause a phenotypic change (“disease”) in you].
L15.
Protein domains related to EGF, serine proteases, and containing
kingle domains, are found in a wide variety of animal proteins,
and it is not uncommon to find all three domains within a single
polypeptide. What genetic mechanism could account for the
combination of these domains found in proteins such as urokinase
and clotting factor IX
Exon/Domain shuffling through the mobilization of transposons.
L15. Hypothet gene encoding proteins A. Propose a model for the origin of gene 1 and gene 2. What evidence supports the model?
pose a model for the origin of HRP-1 and HRG-2. What evidence supports your model?
The simplest model for the origin of HRP-1 and HRG-2 is gene duplication and divergence, as
evident by: (1) sequence similarity, (2) similarity in gene structure (introns/exons), and (3)
clustering with the hypothetin gene on chromosome 1 (which argues against whole genome
duplication)
L15. Hypothet Genes B
You were surprised to find that HRG-2 and HRG-3 have single base changes (*) introducing
multiple stop codons in their coding regions. What would you conclude about HRG-2 and HRG3?
The accumulation of stop codons indicates they cannot make functional product. Both are
“pseudogenes.”
L15. Hypothet Genes C
Examination reveals that HRG-3 has no upstream promoter, lacks the intron found in the the
other genes, and has a stretch of ~100 A’s follows exon 2 (in the sense strand). Propose a model
for the origin of HRG-3?
All of these characteristics (polyA, introns removed, no promoter) are
found in “processed” pseudogenes, in which a cellular mRNA is reverse transcribed to make a cDNA
and then inserted (more or less randomly) into the genome.
L15. Hypothet Genes D
You made knock-outs of the Hypothetin and HRP-1 genes, and introduced them individually
into hypothets. Both were found to be essential (knocking them out was lethal). What would you
conclude about the function(s) of Hypothetin and HRP-1.
The products of both the hypothetin
gene and HRP-1 gene must have essential functions, and the functions are DIFFERENT. If the two
products had the same/similar functions, they would be redundant and individual knockouts would
not be lethal (you could knock out one, and the other would compensate).
L16. Start Codons?
AUG
L16. Stop Codons
UAA
UAG
UGA
L16. Which reading window would be found in the miiddle of a polypeptide?
The one without multiple stop codons inserted.
L16. What determines which product was actually formed during translation?
During translation, the reading frame, and thus the sequence of the protein product, is
determined by the “start codon (AUG),” which encodes methionine. With few exceptions, protein
synthesis begins with methionine (formyl-methionine, or fmet, in prokaryotes). Often, the initial
methionine is cleaved post-translationally
L15. How might you explain the tandem organization of Ig domains in IgG
heavy chains? What cellular mechanism might be involved?
Domain duplication by unequal crossing over (homologous
recombination), followed by divergence
L15. How would you explain the obvious structural similarities of IgG heavy and light chains?
What cellular mechanism might be involved?
Gene duplication by unequal crossing over (homologous recombination), followed by
divergence.
L16. Sketch cloverleaf tRNA
Include, acceptor system/sequence, correct conjugation amino acid and various loops.
DIAGRAM
L16. In prokaryotes, transcription and translation can
occur simultaneously: ribosomes can begin translating a
mRNA before transcription of the mRNA is complete.
Why can’t this happen in eukaryotes?
can’t this happen in eukaryotes?
In prokaryotes, both transcription and translation
occur in a common compartment (the cytoplasm). Thus,
ribosomes have access to the 5’-end of nascent mRNA. In
eukaryotes, transcription and translation occur in separate compartments (the nucleus and
cytoplasm, respectively). Nascent transcripts have to be processed (capping, splicing,
polyadenylation) before they are transported to the cytoplasm for translation.
L16. How does the process of translation initiation differ in prokaryotes and eukaryotes?
Prokaryotes translation begins with formyl-methionine (fmet). In addition, polycistronic
prokaryotic mRNAs include conserved “ribosome binding sites” (= “Shine-Delgarno” sequences)
upstream from each start codon (AUG).
In eukaryotes, the small ribosomal subunit with tRNAi
met and eIFs is loaded at the 5’ end of
the mRNA (facilitated by 5’ cap and poly A tail) and scans to find the start codon (AUG).
[Though we didn’t discuss it in lecture, the order of assembly of the initiation complexes also
differs in prokaryotes and eukaryotes].
L16. Many antibiotics act by specifically inhibiting the function of prokaryotic ribosomes, without
affecting the ribosomes found in the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells. Yet, many of these antibiotics
have side effects that limit their usefulness. Explain.
Eukaryotic mitochondria contain ribosomes that are very similar to those found in their
prokaryotic ancestors. Thus, they share some of the same sensitivities to antibiotics. Poisoning of
mitochondrial ribosomes (and thus mito translation) can cause side effects seen with some
antibiotics.
L16. Outline 3 steps in the elongation of a polypeptide by a ribosome.
(1) The next charged AA-tRNA binds to A site of ribosome, as a complex with EF-1-GTP. GTP
hydrolysis allows release of EF-1-GDP.
(2) The new peptide bond is formed by breaking the ester bond linking the growing polypeptide to
the tRNA in P site, and transferring the polypeptide to the free amino group of the AA-tRNA in the
A-site. The energy for peptide bond formation comes from that stored in the peptidyl-tRNA bond
that is broken. The rxn is catalyzed by the peptidyl transferase activity of the ribosome,
associated with the rRNA. Coincident with peptide bond formation, the large ribosomal subunit is
translocated 1 codon (3 bases) in the 3’ direction.
(3) EF-2-GTP binds to ribosome. GTP hydrolysis releases EF-2-GDP, and small subunit is
translocated 1 codon (3 bases) in the 3’ direction. The empty tRNA from step 2 is released from
the E site of the ribosome.
L16. How does GTP hydrolysis contribute to the fidelity of translation?
GTP hydrolysis by EF-1 (EF-Tu in prkaryotes) provides the energy for “proof reading” of the
aminoacyl-tRNA loaded into the A-site of the ribosome. Peptide bond formation cannot occur until
EF-1 hydrolyses its bound GTP to GDP, which releases EF-1 from the aa-tRNA and ribosome. If the
wrong aa-tRNA is bound, it cannot base pair with the codon, and is released before EF-1 can
hydrolyze GTP and be released. This allows another AA-tRNA to enter the A-site…
L16. What provides the energy for peptide bond formation?
The energy stored in the ester bond linking the AA to the tRNA… the equivalent of two high
energy bonds used during charging
L16. What provides the energy for translocation of the ribosomal subunits?
The energy of charging powers peptide bond formation and translocation of the large
ribosomal subunit. The GTP hydrolyzed by EF-2 (EF-G in prokaryotes) powers translocation of the
small subunit.
L16. How is translation terminated?
In a normal “wild type” cell, there are no AA-tRNAs which can base-pair with stop codons
(UAG, UAA, UGA). When the ribosome reaches a stop codon, it (the stop codon) is recognized by
one of the “release factors.” The release factor binds in the A-site and causes the ribosome to
hydrolyse (break by adding water) the ester bond linking the polypeptide to the tRNA in the P-site.
The polypeptide is released… the ribosome subunits dissociate from the mRNA to be re-used.
L16. E. coli cells containing the Amber suppressor gene “read through” the UAG stop codon by
inserting tyr in the protein instead of stopping translation. Propose a molecular
mechanism/explanation for the amber suppressor
How to test hypothesis?
What precautions might cells evolve to prevent such suppressor activities from being
detrimental?
Cells bearing the amber suppressor mutation express a mutated tRNAtyr , in which the first
position of the anti-codon has been changed to C, allowing it to base pair with the UAG (stop) codon
instead of the UAC or UAU codons for tyr
B:
Clone and sequence the gene encoding the tRNA for tyr
C:
The coding region of most mRNAs are followed by multiple stop codons (if one is
“missed,” it is followed by another)
L16. Compare and/or contrast the cost (in high energy phosphate bonds) of adding a single amino
acid to a protein with the cost of adding 3 nucleotides (= 1 codon) to a mRNA. How would you
reconcile this comparison with the statement made in lecture that translation was “energetically
expensive,” accounting for as much as 80% of the energy used by cells?
It takes six high energy bonds to add one codon to an mRNA: two per nucleotide added. Yet,
it takes “only” four high energy bonds to add an amino acid (two for charging that also power
peptide bond synthesis, one for binding the aa-tRNA to the A-site, and one to translocate the
ribosome). Why, then, is protein synthesis more demanding of energy? Because a single mRNA
molecule can be translated many, many times, making many copies of the same protein.
L16. Eukaryotic heat shock proteins were first identified in the fruit fly Drosphila melanogaster,
where they were expressed in response to brief treatments at elevated temperatures. Expression
of the HSPs conferred resistance to subsequent, more prolonged treatment at higher
temperatures. Based on your understanding of the cellular roles of HSPs, how might they help
cells resist or recover from high temperature?
High temperatures “denature” (unfold) proteins. This inactivates the protein… but it also
can result in formation of large protein precipitates, as the exposed hydrophobic regions of
proteins (usually buried in the center, now exposed) aggregate. Both protein denaturation and the
formation of these protein aggregates can be toxic to the cell. “Heat shock proteins” like those of
the HSP70 family can bind the hydrophobic regions of unfolded proteins, preventing formation of
protein aggregates. Along with HSP60s, they may also help refold some proteins. Both HSP70s and
HSP60s use cycles of ATP hydrolysis during the binding/release/folding process