Exam 3 Flashcards
what are the two essential questions when it comes to debating rationality?
- what does it mean to be rational?
- are humans rational?
what are some examples of irrational statements?
- there are more red apples in the world than there are red things
- it is better to enact a policy in which 2/3 of the people in a group will live rather than a policy where 1/3 of the people will die
- to make sure no one comes into the concert without a ticket, you must make sure everyone in the concert has a ticket and that everyone who has a ticket is at the concert
what is the standard view of rationality?
to be rational is to reason in accordance with the principles of reasoning…based on rules of logic, probability theory, and so forth
what are rational beings good at?
logical reasoning
what is the setup and general results of the Linda the feminist bank teller example?
-scientists give a description of Linda, who is described with many features of a feminist. participants were asked to choose what was more likely if she was a bank teller or a feminist bank teller
-89% of people picked she was more likely to be a feminist and a bank teller rather than just a bank teller
what is the conjuction fallacy?
the probability of A can’t be less than the probability of A & B
how does Linda’s example show conjuction fallacy?
the probability that Linda is a bank teller can’t be less than the probability that she is a feminist bank teller
what is representativeness?
selecting based on how they represent the essential features of the evidence
how is representativeness shown in the Linda example?
the description of Linda is highly representative to feminists, and much more representative to feminists than bank tellers
what is the explanation T&K give of the results of the Linda example?
they are using conjunction fallacy
what is the setup and general results of the lawyer/engineer example?
-a panel of psychologists have interviewed and administered personality tests to 30 engineers and 70 lawyers, all successful in their respective fields. on the basis of this information, thumbnail descriptions of the 30 engineers and 70 lawyers have been written
-there are 3 types of descriptions:
one that sounds like an engineer, one that sounds like just some dude, and one that has no description
-were told to guess on a scale of 1-100 if they believe the description is an engineer
-case 3: most people guessed right
-case 1: thought it was highly likely he was an engineer in both lawyer dominant and engineer dominant studies
-case 2: 50% in both lawyer and engineer dominant conditions
what is the fault reasoning in the lawyer/engineer case?
rather than using probabilities, we use how representative the descriptions are to the population to make our decision (base rate neglect)
what is base rate neglect?
subjects either completely or very nearly completely ignore the base-rate, and base their probability almost completely on the description
what is bayesian reasoning?
the probability of a hypothesis on a given body of evidence in part depends on the prior probability of the hypothesis
what the prior probability have to do with bayesian reasoning?
the probability of given evidence in part depends on the prior probability
what are some examples of bayesian reasoning?
all 19 people (that you know of) who have tried to dive off of a certain cliff have died, so you consider it to be a dangerous activity. then honest uncle jeff tells you he survived jumping off it, so you have to update your probability of dying
what is the setup and general results of the framing effect?
you give people the same question framed in different ways and see that when you use words with negative connotations, they are less likely to pick that option
what is T&K’s explanation of the framing effect?
we have “contradictory attitudes towards risks involving gains and losses”
what is the overview of the T&K argument?
-a being is rational only if it can reason in accordance with the kinds of rules laid out by probability theory and logic
-humans are not very good at reasoning in accordance with probability theory and logic
what is the conclusion of the T&K argument?
humans are not rational
which premise of the T&K argument does the idea of ecological rationality disagree with?
that humans are completely irrational
what is ecological rationality?
decision-making process is rational to the degree that it succeeds in real-world environments, taking into account the limitations that the organism faces
how does ecological rationality differ from the standard view?
a decision-making process is rational to the degree that it respects the rules of logic, probability, statistics while a decision-making process is rational to the degree that it succeeds in real-world environments, taking into account the limitations that the organism faces
what is the idea of “satisficing”?
to look for adequate solutions, use them, then move on to the next problem
what is the idea of bounded rationality?
organisms have limited time, knowledge, and computational capacities, and each environment presents its own kinds of challenges
how is the idea of bounded rationality connected to the idea of ecological rationality?
using ecological rationality, they must take into account the limitations that we are bounded by
what are the modules in evolutionary psychology?
cognitive mechanisms that are specialized to operate some (often very) specific task
what are modules evolved from?
some reoccurring problem faced by our hominid ancestors