exam #3 Flashcards
what does “the dress” show and can potentially be influenced by
we all have differences in perception; morningness vs eveningness
personality processes definition
-interaction between different parts of the mind as they relate to personality
-tendencies to think, feel, and behave in certain ways
what three things interact to produce personality
cognitive, motivational/ emotional, and environmental factors
two different bases of personality processes
-trait based
-psychodynamic processes (motivation and emotion rooted); unique to the person or not
cognitive perspective
-formation, maintenance, and influence of mental representations we form on personality
-idea that personality reflects how we process info about ourselves, others, and world
Allport and cognitive perspective
“for some the world is a hostile place where men are evil and dangerous; for others it is a stage for fun and frolic”
personality processes diagram
person
| |-motivation
perceive->evaluation->emotion->behavior
George Kelly’s theory
-personal constructs: make up personality) loaded
-people as scientists: what the world is like, what’s gonna happen, etc
-Cf working models
-conscious and non conscious: both affectively (emotionally) loaded
George Kelly’s personal constructs meaning
bipolar: good/bad, trustworthy/not
Cf working models
-representations, schemas, etc
-we take in info about world and store it in a coded manner
how schemas/ constructs/ working models work
-representation is for doing
-info filter: bias what we take in and think is important to pay attention to
-basis for decision making
-activation guides behavior
Bargh and colleagues automaticity research, goals, issues
-people who are primed with “rude”, “impolite”, “obnoxious” more likely to interrupt
-goals: same results when consciously activated as when subliminally primed
(ex: “strive”,”succeed”-> persist longer on tasks, do better)
-low replication rates
rejection sensitivity
high rejection filter, more likely to fixate on negative feelings
hostile attribution bias
tendency to view others as hostile
defensive pessimism
expect worse so disappointment isn’t as bad and success is extra good
types of locus, meanings, example
-internal: put on self (I screwed up)
-external: put on others, chance, luck, etc (its their fault)
types of stability, meanings, example
-stable: persists over time, enduring (my relationships never work out)
-unstable: unique to one situation, temporary (we didn’t function well together)
types of globally, meanings, example
-global: influences all aspects of life (I’m hopeless in every aspect of my life)
-specific: influences one aspect (I’m not good at relationships but good at other things)
implicit association test
-measures reaction time: faster to respond to paired stimuli when they’re already paired internally
-nonconscious
attitudes vs associations
-attitudes: value judgment about something
-associations: degree of connection in mind between concepts
Epstein’s cognitive-experiential self theory two systems
rational and experiential systems
rational system
-analytic, logical
-directed by conscious appraisals
-abstract symbols, words, numbers, math, language
-slow, malleable
-effortful
experiential system
-holistic, affective
-“vibes”, based on past experience
-vivid images, metaphors, stories
-fast, resistant to change
-automatic
operational systems of cognition 2 parts
-motus: movement/ motion
-emotus: “stirred up”/ moved
Carver and Scheier’s model of self-regulation: reference value, comparator, etc
-reference value: motivation/ what we want to happen
-influences comparator: how things are going vs how we want them to go (ex thermometer, determines action based on set points/ goals)
-leads to behavior, impact on envt, perception
common themes of theories of what motivates us
sex, aggression, achievement, affiliation, autonomy, protection, exploration
motivational hierarchies
motive at top, goals under, sub-goals under, motor program under
motive
biologically based, mostly innate urge or tendency to behave in ways that bring about satisfaction
cybernetics and control systems
-cognition is motivated
-Carver and Scheier’s model of self regulation is a goal-oriented system
emotion
appraised fate of a goal or motive, and the ensuing multi component response
emotion system
top: affect regulation efforts; can lead to physiological changes
middle: external or internal events-appraisal of the event in relation to goals, concerns- appraisal-specific affect program or brain circuit :leads to physiological changes, expression, actions, tendencies, etc
motivation and emotion
emotions are feedback systems that regulate an organism’s behavior according to needs
overarching processes of emotion: offense vs defense
-offense: signs of threat/ punishment instigate processes devoted to protecting the self and cultivating feelings of security
-defense: signs of reward instigate processes devoted to accruing and sharing resources and maximizing pleasure
approach motives: basic, self, social, individual differences
-basic: eat, mate, explore
-self: achieve (C), master, learn (O), understand
-social: play, affiliate (E), care (A)
avoidance motives: basic, self, social, individual differences
-basic: defend, aggress (N)
-self: hubristic pride (narcissism), admiration from others, soothing worldviews
-social: attach (attachment style)
locus of control of personality process
-universal at general level
-stable across situations and time: suggests trait-like individual differences
attraction/ selection
we choose to enter certain environments
evocation
we produce reactions from others
manipulation
ways we try to want
ways personality interacts with the social envt
-attraction/ selection, evocation, manipulation
-cultural and subcultural influences (ex gender and sex roles)
selection and mating
-we say we care more about personality than health, intelligence, and physical attractiveness
-people say they prefer someone similar to us than different more often than they mate assortively
-suggests people don’t know what they want
similarity and marital quality
-positive associations for personality related domains but not for attitude related domains
-similarity on attachment characteristics were more strongly predictive of satisfaction
desirability of personality traits (big5) and relationship satisfaction
-partner with high A, C, ES, O related to satisfaction
-people in relationships with those w socially desirable traits are more likely to be satisfied
PEM/ positive emotionality traits and big 5
-confidence, enthusiasm, social warmth, well-being, zest
-extraversion
NEM/ negative emotionality traits and big 5
-threshold for neg emotions, such as anxiety, anger, fear
-neuroticism
CON/ constraint
-self-control, harm avoidance, endorsement of social norms
emotionality and constraint vs relationships
-negative emotionality seems more important in satisfaction than positive
-NEM influences both person and their partner
-higher neg emotion: less satisfaction and more abuse
-similar findings with different people
influence of parents on relationship satisfaction
moms indirectly influence it
Gottman’s four horsemen of the apocalypse
-experience and expression of emotion during ongoing couple interactions
-behaviors that communicate to the other person that you don’t respect them (ex eye rolling)
relationship schemas
ideals, expectations etc about one’s partner
attachment and relationship satisfaction big 5
N related to insecure attachment
dark triad
psychopathy, machiavelliani, narcissism
machiavellianism
-manipulative power seekers
-planning, alliance building, impression management