Exam 3 Flashcards
What is policy analysis?
What you need to do in order to write a great policy memo
“Client-oriented advice relative to public decisions informed by evidence and social values”
“The process of identifying potential policy options that could address your problem and
then comparing those options to choose the most effective, efficient, and feasible one”
Art and a science
Steps for Conducting a Policy Analysis
- Define the Problem
- Identify Possible Policy Options
- Assess and Prioritize Policy Options
Why does it matter how we define a problem?
it will influence how and if the solution becomes implemented into policy
Tips for Identifying Policy Options
Begin with a comprehensive list
Look for ideas that already exist
Review literature on the topic
Conduct an environmental scan to see what others are doing and/or proposing
Look for ideas in other problem areas that might apply
Consider whether you need to invent options
Always include, “let present trends continue undisturbed” as an initial option
Criteria for Assessing Options
- Public health impact
Will the option work to solve the problem?
Can you estimate the magnitude of the impact?
What might be the unintended consequences of the option? - Feasibility
Political – How might political forces influence the successful enactment and implementation of the option?
Operational – Are the necessary resources, capacities, and technologies in place to implement the option? - Economic and budgetary impacts
Budget – Do the relevant public entities have enough money to enact, implement, and enforce the option?
Economic – How do costs compare to benefits?
Prioritizing Policy Options
Consider the key trade-offs (i.e., what do you lose/gain if you choose one option over the others?)
Decide which option you think is best
The policy option you prioritize will depend on the weight you place on the three criteria
What is a system?
A collection of interconnected elements
Through their interactions, form a whole with properties beyond the
component parts
In complex adaptive systems, components are continuously interacting
and adapting to changes
Systems thinking is a way of thinking…
…that helps us see the world as a complex system in order to make
progress on complex problems
Policy Resistance
Actions meant to solve a problem cause unanticipated “side effects”
System responds to our actions to restore stability in ways that delay,
dilute, or defeat them to make the policy ineffective
Actions can make the problem worse than it was to begin with
Types of evidence
Bardach
1. About the problem itself: magnitude,
duration, impact
2. About the causal roots of the problem
3. About potential interventions to address
the problem
Rychetnik et al.
“Something should be done” (Type 1)
“This should be done” (Type 2)
“How this should be done”
Impact Evaluations
Assess changes in well-being that can be attributed to a particular project, program or
policy
Did it work?
Central question is what would have happened to those receiving the intervention if
they had not in fact received it
Uses experimental or quasi-experimental methods to develop a counterfactual
Randomized control trials
the gold standard of studies
Strengths
Minimizes bias
High internal validity
Creates a counterfactual
Allows us to make causal inferences
Weaknesses
Expensive
Not always appropriate
Not always generalizable
* A type of impact evaluation in which participants are randomized into an
experimental group or a control group
So why don’t policymakers follow scientific evidence?
Politics
Biases
Confirmation bias - The tendency to look for
information that is consistent with what we
already think, want, or feel
Availability bias - The tendency to let an
example that comes to mind easily affect
decision-making or reasoning
Misinformation
Poor understanding of science
Policy Windows
Opportunities for action by packaging problem,
politics, and solutions together
Opened by events in the problem or political
streams
Magnet for problems and proposals
Usually small and scarce
Evidence Translators
Translators hold a wide range
of roles
Political savvy and credibility
are key
Rigor of evidence is not as
influential as is often assumed