Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Biostats > Exam 2 BIO > Flashcards

Exam 2 BIO Flashcards

1
Q

Case control

A

disease is rare and exposure is common

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Cohort

A

disease is common and exposure is rare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

case-control

A

disease has a long latent period and the exposure information is very expensive to obtain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

odds ratio

A

AD/BC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

interpreting odds ratio

A

compared to normal, patients with ___ had 3.9 times the odds of having _____

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

measures of association

A

comparison of disease frequency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

absolute measure

A

calculate difference between 2 measures of disease freqeuncy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

relative measure

A

calculate the ratio of 2 measures of disease frequency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

if there is NO association between the exposure and disease then,

A

RD=0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

if the exposure is associated with increased risk of disease then,

A

RD>0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

if the exposure is associated with DECREASED risk of disease then,

A

RD<0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cumulative Incidence (CI) -Risk difference

A

Exposed (Disease) -Unexposed (No Disease)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

If RR is less than 1 (like 0.55), then

A

(1-RR), so 1-0.55=0.45—–45% decrease in risk (in whatever like getting a vaccine)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Risk Ratio

A

Ratio of cumulative incidence between (exposed/unexposed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Excess Relative Risk

A

(RR-1) X 100%—-meaning ___ % have an increased risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

RD is Absolute Measure

A

Represents measure of public health impact of exposure on disease occurrence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

RR is Relative Measure

A

Represents measure of strength or magnitude of the association between an exposure and a disease—-used in etiologic research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

There are 2 types of epidemiology

A

Descriptive and Analytic/Scientific

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Descriptive

A

-Identifies and counts cases of disease/population according to person, place, time
Case reports and series
Cross-Sectional study
Ecologic Study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Analytic/Scientific

A

-Compares group and systemically determine if there is association
Clinical trial
Experimental Study
Case-Control Study
Cohort Study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Prospective Cohort Study

A

Weakness: -More expensive, time consuming, and not efficient for diseases with long latent periods
Strength: Better exposure and confounder data and less vulnerable to bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Retrospective Cohort Study

A

Weakness: Exposure and confounder data may be inadequate and more vulnerable to bias
Strength: Cheaper, faster and efficient with diseases with long latent period
Start of the study: Compare incidence of disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Cohort Study Limitations

A

may need large number of subjects to be followed for long periods of time-difficult, expensive and time consuming
Undermines validity (loss to follow)
Not good for rare diseases/long latency
Not good when exposure data are expensive to obtain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Case-Control Study

A

Investigator identifies cases and selects controls who represent a sample of the population —>compares exposures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Cohort Study
Investigator identifies exposed and unexposed groups---->compares incidence of outcome
26
When to conduct a case-control study?
-When exposure data are expensive or difficult to obtain -when disease has long latent period/decades for results -disease is rare -population is difficult to follow/high loss -little is known about the disease/need to evaluate many exposures
27
Case control studies need source population:
FIxed or Dynamic but are good in dynamic populations
28
Controls
to estimate the exposure distribution in source population that produced the cases must come from same source population must be selected independently of exposure
29
Would Criterion
Would it be enrolled as a case? if yes then selection bias is unlikely To be yes: controls need to have SAME population as the cases that were selected
30
Nested Controls
Controls selected from an existing cohort population (sub-set)
31
Population Based Controls
Controls selected from general population-suitable when cases are from well defined geographic area
32
Hospital or Clinic Based Controls
Controls selected from among patients at a hospital or clinic (should be unrelated to exposure , should not cause the exposure)
33
3 ways to sample controls in case-control study
1. survival sampling 2. Case-Cohort Sampling 3. Risk-Set Sampling
34
Survivor Sampling
Select Controls at END of follow-up
35
Case-Cohort Sampling
Select controls from starting Cohort at beginning of follow-up
36
Risk-set sampling
Longitudinally select controls as cases arise during follow-up
36
Risk-set sampling
Longitudinally select controls as cases arise during follow-up
37
Case-Control Studies Strength
Fewer ethical concerns, more efficient than cohort study (less time, fewer subjects needed, no need to wait for long latency diseases to develop), easy to explore effect of many exposures on an outcome (ID outbreak, or disease with little info)
38
Case-Control Studies Limitation
limited to a single outcome, inefficient for rare exposures, more opportunity for systematic bias, cannot calculate absolute measure of association
39
Nonparametric tests
when data is not normally distributed
40
When to use nonparametric tests
-when sample size is too small -when data has outliers that cant be removed -when you want to test for median rather than the mean (skewed distribution) -Outcome is continuous and not normally distributed
41
Non-parametric tests include:
Spearman Rank Correlation, 1-sample sign test, mann-whitney test, wilcoxon signed rank test, kruskal-wallis test, friedmans ANOVA
42
Use nonparametric if sample size:
Less than 20
43
Mann-Whitney U test
Test 2 independent samples with the dependent ordinal/continuos not assumed to follow a normal distribution If H0 (null) two populations are equal; if H1 , two populations are not equal
44
Sign Test (pos/neg)
-Continuos outcome measured in matched or paired samples -SUBTRACT After - Before -Can be used for ordered (ranked) categorical data H0=Median difference is zero H1=Median difference < or > zero Reject H0 if the smaller of the number of pos/neg signs is less than or equal to the critical value
45
Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
-Examines signs, score differences, and magnitude of observed difference -SUBTRACT Before - After -Test statistic is W and we use the smaller of W+ and W- Reject H0 if W is < or = to critical value
46
Kruskal Wallis Test
sample size does not need to be equal K>2 H0=K population median are equal H1=K population median are not equal Test statistic is H Reject H0 if H is >/= critical value
47
logistic regression
used when the independent variables include both numerical and nominal measures and the outcome variable is BINARY (Dichotomous) -YES/NO -Sruvived/Deceased
48
Logistic Regression Variables:
Two Indepedents: X1=dichotomous and X2=Continuous Outcome Variable: Y=Dichotomous
49
Odds Ratio
If OR is >1: greater odds of association of exposure and outcome If OR=1: there is no association between exposure and outcome If OR<1: there is a lower odds of association If CI includes 1 then results are not statistically significant
50
If OR=1.2
1-1.2 times 100=20% chance increase in odds of an outcome happening
51
If CI includes 1 then
cant be significant because can be either lower or higher cant pick a side in other words
52
Analyzing Hazard Ratio: HR=0.87
(1-HR)X 100= 13% reduction
53
Survival Analysis
situations where the outcome is the length of time that elapses until the event of interest occurs For example: 1. Length of time until death following diagnosis of a disease 2. Length of time to cancer remission 3. Length of time until death following initiation of therapy
54
Survival Analysis what does it measure?
Outcome is time to event measures whether person has event or not (Yes/No) and time to event estimate survival time determine factors (pt characteristics) associated with longer survival
55
survival analysis used to:
determine if the risk of experiencing a particular event over a specific period of time differs between groups
56
Log rank test
determines if the difference between two survival curves is statistically significant -the larger the difference, the more likely it is statistically significant
57
Survival Curves:
Estimated using Kaplan-Meier Method and compared statistically using log-rank test
58
hazard ratio
measures an effect of the intervention on an outcome of interest over time
59
If negative outcome (death) and hazard ratio <1:
this is desirable and is a percent reduction in risk if HR was 0.25, then 75% were less likely to die
60
Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model
outcome is still time to event but it is an extension to survival analysis by including control variables in the regression model
61
Repeated Measure ANOVA
technique used to test equality of means -Need to measure 3 items
62
When to use repeated Measure ANOVA
measuring performance on the same variable over time (changes in performance in training or after a treatment) -same subject is measured multiple times under different conditions -same subject provides measures/ratings on different characteristics
63
superior trial
aims to show that the new drug is better than standard treatment -like traditional hypothesis testing -if 0 is not contained within the CI we can reject H0-->concluding new drug is superior
64
Non-inferiority Trial
Aims to show that the new drug is no worse (not inferior) than standard treatment (existing med) by a prespecified amount. Prespecified amount=non-inferiority margin and is sometimes expressed as M -There is no placebo group: control group takes existing medication that already demonstrated effectiveness -compare CI to M2 and to zero
65
two noninferiority margins (M1 and M2):
M1 reflects the difference between control drug and placebo. Reflects the full efficacy of control drug M2 a smaller amount that reflects how much efficacy the investigators are willing to give up in return for other advantages the new drug may offer.(like improved safety)
66
Equivalence Trials
aims to show that the new treatment is no better and no worse -rejecting the H0 is equivalent to concluding that the test drug and control drug DO NOT DIFFER from one another

Biostats (4 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions