Exam 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Value Judgments: Egocentrism

A

self centered philosophy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Value Judgments: Ethnocentrism

A

culture centered philosophy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Value Judgments:

Anthropocentrism

A

human centered (spiecism)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Value Judgements: Sentientism

A

all sentient beings deserve moral consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Value Judgments: Biocentrism

A

life centered philosophy (all life is morally considerable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Value Judgments: Ecocentrism

A

complete ecosystems deserve moral consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Moral Reasoning

A

Requires moral value judgement as premise and reasoning about morality involves creating an arg. With conclusions that are moral value judgements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

precautionary principle

A

Moral rule or belief that helps you know what is right and wrong and that influences your actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

value Judgment words

A

Words like ought, should, right, wrong are used in value judgements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Moral theories: Divine command

A

moral duty is set by divine commandment (god)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Moral theories: Utilitariansim

A

if an individual can feel pleasure/pain then they deserve moral consideration. Primarily concerned with consequences and says that right actions result in most beneficial balance of good over bad consequences for everyone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Moral theories: Deontology/Duty theory

A

view that person should perform action b/c it’s their moral duty to perform it, not b/c of any consequences that may follow from it. (example of Khant and like chidi)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Moral theories: Virtue Ethics

A

focuses not only on what to do, but on how to be. Concerned with questions of character

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Moral Types: Moral Skepticism

A

diverse collection of views that doubt or deny the existence of morality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Moral types: Moral subjectivism

A

what is right and wrong is merely a matter of subjective opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Moral types:Moral relativism

A

the idea that right and wrong depends on and is determined by one’s group or culture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Modus Ponens:

A

Mode of affirming
If A then B
A
B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Modus Tollens

A

Mode of denying
If A then B
Not B
Not A

19
Q

Chain argument

A

Conditional statements
If A then B
If B then C
If A then C

20
Q

Formal Fallicies

A

all are invalid. These include affirming the consequent, denying the antecedent, undistributed middle, and precise change

21
Q

Invalid: affirming the consequent

A

If A then B
B
A

22
Q

Invalid: denying the antecedent

A

If A then B
Not A
Not B

23
Q

invalid: the undistributed middle

A

If A then B
If C then B
If A then C

24
Q

A claim

A

All X are Y

25
E claim
No X are Y
26
I claim
Some X are Y
27
O claim
Some x are not Y
28
Anatomy of conditional statement
If P (antecedent) then Q (consequent)
29
square of opposition: Contrary
cannot both be true, but can both be false A← ---> E
30
square of opposition: sub-contrary
cannot both be false, can both be true I←- → 0
31
square of opposition: contradiction
``` cannot both be true, cannot both be false (true opposites) A E \ / / \ I O ```
32
converse
for E and I claims only. Created by switching positions of subject and predicate terms (No S are P >>> No P are S)
33
Contraposition
Valid for A and O claims. Created by switching positions of subject predicate terms and replacing both terms w/ their complements (All S are P>>> All non P are Non S) (Some S are not P >>> Some non P are not non S)
34
Obverse
valid for all claims. Created by changing affirmative to negative or vise-versa and replacing predicate term w/ it's complement (A: all S are P> All S are non P) (I: Some S are P> Some S are not non P)
35
Distribution: A claim
All (S) are P
36
Distribution: I claim
None: some S are P
37
Distribution: E claim
No (S) are (P)
38
Distribution: O claim
some S are Not (P)
39
1st rule of testing for validity
The number of negative claims in the premises must be the same as the number of negative claims in the conclusion
40
Second rule of testing for validity
At least one premise must distribute the middle term
41
3rd rule of testing for validity
Any term that is distributed in the conclusion of the syllogism must be distributed in its premises
42
Moral theories
utilitrianism, divine command, deontology/duty, virtue ethics
43
Moral types
Moral skepticism, moral subjectivism, moral relativism