Exam 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Motivation:

A

“An inner state of arousal that provides energy needed to achieve a goal.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Needs:

A

“Internal state of tension caused by disequilibrium from an ideal/desired physical or psychological state.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Need Recognition

A

Get consumers to perceive a need (i.e. discrepancy between actual and desired state)
–Can move perceived desired state up or perceived actual state down

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do you motivate people? (maslow)

A

get them out of Maslow’s basement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reasons consumers are not motivated

A
  1. Ability
  2. Time
  3. Care
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Reasons consumers are not motivated: Ability

A
  1. Finances are an issue or 2. not enough information to make a decision

Solution – Promotion: discount and/or educate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Reasons consumers are not motivated: Time

A

Don’t have the time necessary to 1. research products or 2. sign up for service

Solution – Make research easy; focus on ease of use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Reasons consumers are not motivated: Care

A
  1. I don’t see what the problem is?
  2. I don’t want that thing.
  3. Deciding is too much work.

Solution –

  1. Prove that there is a problem
  2. Appeal to impulses
  3. Streamline consumer choice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Ability Problem: not enough information

A
  1. Performance risk: will the product perform?
  2. Financial risk: is it affordable for me?
  3. Physical risk: is it safe?
  4. Social risk: will it hurt my social standing?
  5. Psychological risk: does it fit with my self-image?
  6. Time risk: do I have the time to invest in it?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Paradox of choice

A

too many options is bad; more is less

  • supposedly “more choices, more likely you choose the optimal choice” (idea)
  • – this is based on the idea that humans are rational which is not true
  • more regret and less satisfaction comes with more choices (reality)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What do economists believe about choices?

A

more choices are better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Researchers find that having too many choices can cause:

A
  • greater indecision/avoidance
  • more regret
  • less satisfaction with choices
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Famous jam study

A
  • when shoppers were allowed to pick from 24 jam options for tasting, only 3% bought jam
  • when shoppers were allowed to pick from 6 jam options for tasting, 30% of shoppers bought jam
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Streamline choices

A
  • specify attributes you are interested in
  • you are able to narrow down your options by using different filters such as size, style, color, etc
  • -EX: men’s socks online
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Dual Process Theory

A

Attitudes can form through two routes. One is high effort and requires deliberation (i.e., central route), the other is low effort and can operate automatically or unconsciously (peripheral route)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When do consumers follow a central route?

A
  1. High Ability/opportunity and High Motivation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

When do consumers follow a peripheral route?

A
  1. Low Ability/Opportunity and High Motivation
  2. Low Ability/Opportunity and Low Motivation
  3. High Ability/Opportunity and Low Motivation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Attitudes based on low effort: Cognitive Methods

A
  • Category and Schema-Consistent Info
    • Name of product (Healthy Choice)
    • Price (higher price, higher quality)
    • Color (green=fresh)
  • Frequency effect
  • Simple message
  • “at-a-glance” indicator of credibility
  • Truth effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Attitudes based on low effort: Affective Methods

A
  • Communication source
    • Physical attractiveness
    • Likeability
    • Celebrity
  • Message
    • Pleasant pictures
    • Music
    • Humor
    • Sex
    • Emotional content
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What makes a message effective under central route processing?

A
  • Comparative Ads
  • Two-Sided Messages
  • Strong Arguments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Comparative ads

A

be careful with these, they can go very badly. Mini cooper is a good example of how to highlight your product by using a comparative ad. They are now positioned differently in consumer’s brains because they are closer to the porsche in their webs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Two-sided Messages

A

It can be good to point out that your product has its flaws. Maybe your medicine tastes terrible, but it works really well. You can point out that the taste isn’t as important as the effectiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Strong Arguments

A
  • Facts
  • Evidence
  • Examples
  • Logical Reasoning
  • Objective (as opposed to subjective) Claims
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Theory of Reasoned Action

A

?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

When attitudes conflict with behaviors

A

Results in a state of Cognitive Dissonance

- Attitudes or behaviors must change to reduce dissonance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Do you think asking consumers what they need/want is a good idea?

A
  • Yes: when you are expanding on a current product; consumers know what needs they have
  • No: can’t ask avg. consumer to innovate; might be unable to deliver on the features they request
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Where do consumers want to be in Maslow’s hierarchy?

A

assume they want to be in the penthouse

– move them from the basement to the penthouse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Normative:

A
  • Focus is on finding rules that lead to the “best” decision in a given situation.
  • How should consumers make decisions?
  • Expected utility theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Descriptive:

A
  • Focus is on describing how people make decisions.
  • How do consumers make decisions?
  • Prospect theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Expected value equation

A

EV = (SIGMA) probability of outcome * value of outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Expected utility theory equation

A

EU = (SIGMA) portability of outcome * utility of that outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Prospect theory

A

Assumes that values are evaluated as gains and losses relative to some reference level
–steeper curve in losses than in gains

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Loss Aversion

A
  • Losses and gains are not valued equally (losses hurt more than gains feel good)
  • Loss aversion explains the endowment effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

The endowment effect

A

Pain associated with losing the endowed object > anticipated pleasure from buying the endowed object

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

How to use the endowment effect?

A

Encourage consumers to touch/hold merchandise. Giving up our things hurts. We value our things more that others do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Remembered utility

A

you are being asked to think back and reflect on a time in the past

  • Remembered utility is subject to memory biases
  • People do not logically integrate all the moments of a past experience
37
Q

Instant utility

A

you are being asked about something right now

- how do you feel right now?

38
Q

Experiencing self vs. remembering self

A

the end of an experience does not ruin the experience, but it does ruin the memory of that experience

39
Q

Anchoring

A

Consumers use anchoring and adjustment strategies

  • Use reference points to start (anchor)
  • Then correct away (adjust)
40
Q

How do marketers use anchoring?

A
  • price something very high and then discount it so it seems like they are getting a good price
  • have a specialty item that is super expensive that you don’t intend to sell many of to use as a way of making the regular priced item seem like a good deal
41
Q

External anchors

A
  • explicitly prompted by an experimenter, question, or context
  • “Did Gandhi live to be more or less than 101 years of age?”
  • “How many years did Gandhi live?
42
Q

Internal anchors

A
  • implicitly suggested by an experimenter, question, or context.
  • “What is blood temperature of a bobcat?”
43
Q

Representativeness

A
  • Judge the probability that an item is a member of a class by the degree to which the item is representative of (resembles) the class.
  • As the detail of the description increases, people judge that it is more probable. (However, more detail decreases probability!)
44
Q

The conjunction fallacy

A

Judging the conjunction of two events to be more probable than one of the constituent elements
– people think P(A,B) > P(A) or P(B)

45
Q

Availability Heuristic

A

Basing judgments on the ease with which instances can be brought to mind

  • Using the availability heuristic can lead to biases in judgment because we ignore base rate information (base rate is how often an event really occurs)
46
Q

Base rate neglect

A

this is when people fail to think of things in context
– of course California has more veterans b/c they have more people; having more veterans doesn’t make them more patriotic and they prob don’t have more veterans based on a ratio than other states

47
Q

Projection bias

A

The tendency to unconsciously assume that others share one’s current emotional states, thoughts and values

  • Egocentric perspective taking
  • Empathy gaps
48
Q

Egocentric perspective taking

A

when people think in their own perspective as opposed to thinking about another persons perspective
- Good morning when it is really afternoon (it is morning in california when it is afternoon in new york)

49
Q

False belief task

A

children cannot think of things from another’s perspective – if you don’t see something happen but they do then they will assume that you know it happened too

50
Q

Curse of knowledge

A

People have difficulty ignoring information that others do not possess

51
Q

Empathy gaps

A

Cognitive bias in which a person underestimates the influences of visceral drives, and instead attributes behavior primarily to other, nonvisceral factors

52
Q

Fundamental attribution error

A

Tendency to overemphasize internal characteristics (e.g. personality) to explain someone else’s behavior in a particular situation, rather than considering the situation’s external factors

53
Q

Bias blind spot

A

People tend to see themselves as less susceptible to bias than their peers

54
Q

How do we decide?

A
  1. Based on option attributes
    Attributes can have smaller or heavier weightings (i.e. can be more or less important)
  2. Based on projected satisfaction
    How likely are these options to satisfy me?
  3. Based on pre-existing attitudes or knowledge
    Brand preference or loyalty
55
Q

Noncompensatory Strategies:

A

Simple decision model. Goal is to reject unacceptable options

  • -Elimination-by-Aspects: acceptable cutoffs, order of importance
  • -Lexicographic: order of importance; dominant option on most important attribute
56
Q

Compensatory Strategies:

A

negative features can be compensated for by positive ones

–Averaging Across Attributes: evaluation X importance weighting

57
Q

Averaging Across Attributes:

A

evaluation X importance weighting

– This is compensatory

58
Q

Elimination-by-Aspects:

A
  • Attributes ordered by importance; alternatives acceptable on first attribute proceed to evaluation on further attributes
  • I will eliminate any brands with a value of 2 or below, beginning with most important attribute

acceptable cutoffs, order of importance
– This is noncompensatory

59
Q

Lexicographic:

A

(similar to elimination by aspect, but winner takes all)

  • Attributes ordered by importance
  • As soon as one option dominates, that option is chosen
  • Who wins? (bigger numbers are better)

order of importance; dominant option on most important attribute
– This is noncompensatory

60
Q

Affective forecasting

A

Tendency to mispredict how much pleasure or displeasure future events will bring

  • Impact bias
  • Projection bias
61
Q

Compensatory Strategies:

A

negative features can be compensated for by positive ones

–Averaging Across Attributes: evaluation X importance weighting

62
Q

Averaging Across Attributes:

A

evaluation X importance weighting

– This is compensatory

63
Q

The principles of the influence of persuasion

A
  1. Reciprocity
  2. Consistency
  3. Social Validation
  4. Liking
  5. Authority
  6. Scarcity
64
Q

Lexicographic:

A

(similar to elimination by aspect, but winner takes all)

  • Attributes ordered by importance
  • As soon as one option dominates, that option is chosen
  • Who wins? (bigger numbers are better)

order of importance; dominant option on most important attribute
– This is noncompensatory

65
Q

Affective forecasting

A

Tendency to mispredict how much pleasure or displeasure future events will bring

  • Impact bias
  • Projection bias
66
Q

Impact bias

A
Tendency to overestimate the hedonic impact of future events.
Elections
Romances
Promotions
College tests
Sporting events
Infidelities
Moving to California
Etc
67
Q

Projection bias

A

Projecting how you currently feel on your future self

- don’t shop while you’re hungry

68
Q

Social Validation: When might social validation backfire?

A

?

69
Q

Reciprocity

A
  • charities giving free address labels
  • free sample, trials
  • thank you gift
  • “door in the face” technique, reciprocal concessions
70
Q

Consistency

A

Effective commitments need to be

- public
- voluntary

Marketing implications?

71
Q

Social Validation

A

we don’t want to be different from those around us

– remember the line drawing experiment

72
Q

Social Validation: How do marketers use it?

A
  • Testimonials
  • Behavior of other consumers (over 1 billion served)
  • Ads show groups of people rushing to store
  • Laugh tracks
73
Q

Why do these principles work?

A

because they are oftentimes adaptive

  • Reciprocity – social norm
  • Consistency – desirable personality trait; save mental energy
  • Social Validation – when a lot of people are doing something it is usually the right thing to do
  • Liking – people who like you are typically to be trusted
  • Authority – experts typically know more
  • Scarcity – scarce things are often valuable
74
Q

Liking

A

We want to say yes to people we like

75
Q

Sources of influence

A
  1. Low credibility, High reach, low two-way communication: ads, dm’s, cell phone, special events, publicity, sales promos
  2. Low credibility, low reach, high two-way communication: sales people, customer service reps
  3. High credibility, high reach, low two-way communication: news, blogs, virtual communities
  4. High credibility, low reach, high two-way communication: friends, family, co-workers
76
Q

Authority

A

Increase perceptions of expertise by putting labels on it and using people who are experts

77
Q

Scarcity

A

people want things that they can’t have

78
Q

Why do these principles work?

A

because they are oftentimes adaptive

  • Reciprocity – social norm
  • Consistency – desirable personality trait; save mental energy
  • Social Validation – when a lot of people are doing something it is usually the right thing to do
  • Liking – people who like you are typically to be trusted
  • Authority – experts typically know more
  • Scarcity – scarce things are often valuable
79
Q

What affects normative influence strength?

A

Product characteristics

  1. In private necessity: low influence on brand, low influence on whether or not product is purchased
  2. In public necessity: high influence on brand, low influence on whether or not product is purchased
  3. In private luxury: low influence on brand, high influence on whether or not product is purchased
  4. In public luxury: high influence on brand, high influence on whether or not product is purchased
80
Q

Sources of influence

A
  1. Low credibility, High reach, low two-way communication: ads, dm’s, cell phone, special events, publicity, sales promos
  2. Low credibility, low reach, high two-way communication: sales people, customer service reps
  3. High credibility, high reach, low two-way communication: news, blogs, virtual communities
  4. High credibility, low reach, high two-way communication: friends, family, co-workers
81
Q

Opinion leaders

A
  • Credible/unbiased experts (Non-marketing source)
  • Socially active, interconnected
  • Often fairly similar to the people they’re influencing
  • Self confident, outgoing
  • Evaluate product early (and absorb risk)
  • Enduring involvement with product category
82
Q

Normative influence:

A

Social pressure designed to encourage conformity to the expectations of others

83
Q

Norms:

A

Collective decisions about what constitutes appropriate behavior

84
Q

What affects normative influence strength?

A

Product characteristics

  1. In private necessity: low influence on brand, low influence on whether or not product is purchased
  2. In public necessity: high influence on brand, low influence on whether or not product is purchased
  3. In private luxury: low influence on brand, high influence on whether or not product is purchased
  4. In public luxury: high influence on brand, high influence on whether or not product is purchased
85
Q

Deindividuation

A

people will act differently in a group than they ever would on their own; people will act much differently anonymously than they ever would as an individual
- they will be much crueler in a group than they would alone

86
Q

Social loafing

A

won’t try as hard in a group as you will on your own

87
Q

Risky shift

A

willing to take bigger risks in a group than you would on your own

88
Q

Risky shift: Why does it happen?

A
  • Diffusion of responsibility
  • Value hypothesis
  • Attitude Polarization