Exam 2 Flashcards
Defining properties of a team
Mutual interaction, task interdependence, collective identity, norms and structured communication
A group
Two or more persons who interact with one another such that each person influences the other
Theories of group development
Linear, cyclical and pendular
Linear theory of group development
4 stages, forming, storming, Norming, performing.
Forming stage
First stage. Members familiarise themselves with each other and try to determine if they belong.
Storming
Second stage. Resistance to leader, interpersonal conflict, roles and status establish
Norming
Third stage. Solidarity and cooperation, unity, work together for common goals and task effectiveness
Performing
Final stage. Team focussed on working together, problem solving, defined roles and stabilised interpersonal relationships
Cyclical model for group development
Assumption that groups develop in a manner similar to a life cycle with emphasis on psychological preparation for a terminal phase
Pendular perspective of group formation
Emphasises the shifts that occur in interpersonal relationships during growth of groups and assumed the group does not move progressively in a linear fashion from the instant it forms.
Pendular perspective stages
Orientation, differentiation and conflict, resolution and cohesion, termination
Group roles
A role consists of the set of behaviours required or expected of the person occupying a certain position in a group
Formal role
Dictated by the nature and structure of the organisation
Informal roles
Evolve from interactions amongst group members and group dynamics
Role clarity
Needed to improve team effectiveness and prevent unsatisfaction and abiguity which are negative for the teams performance
Role acceptance conditions
Opportunity for specialised skills, feedback and role recognition, role significance, autonomy
Role conflict
Exists when a role occupant doesn’t have sufficient ability, motivation, time or understanding to achieve a goal
Group norms
A level of performance, patter of behaviour or belief of a group
Norm for productivity
The standard for effort and performance accepted by the team. Rolls into norms for punctuality, attendance and preparedness
When modifying team norms you must consider:
The source of communication to change the norms and the nature of the communication
Social support
Refers to an exchange of resources between at least two individuals perceived by the provider or the recipient to be intended to enhance the well-being of the recipient
Social support provides:
Appraisal, information, reassurance and companionship, reduces uncertainty, aids mental and physical recovery and improves communication
Types of social support
Listening, emotional, emotional-challenge, reality confirmation and task appreciation
Ways to create an effective team climate
Social support, proximity, distinctiveness, fairness, similarity, task interdependence, assessment of team climate
Proximity
People bond when they are near each other and close contact with team mates promotes interaction which can hasten group development e.g. Road trips and locker rooms
Distinctiveness
When a group feels distinct it feels unity and oneness increase e.g. Dress, initiation, mottoes and special privileges
Fairness
Fairness from coaches influences levels of commitment, motivation and satisfaction which is interpreted on: combatibility of coaches and layers, coaches communication and athletes perception the coach is trying to help them
Similarity
The more group members are aware of similarities in commitments, attitudes and goals the greater probability they will develop a strong team concept
Task interdependence
Team mates are responsible to each other as everyone shares the success or failure. Built by reinforcing common fate
Outcome interdependence
Refers to the fact that all group members benefit from the groups performance
Assessment of team climate
Team climate questionnaire. Used over season. Told it’s not a test and kept anonymous
Steiner’s model of actual productivity
Actual productivity= potential productivity - losses attributable to faulty group processes
Potential productivity
A teams possible best performance
Faulty group processes
Motivation losses and coordination losses
The Ringlemann effect
The phenomenon by which individual performance decreases as the number of people in a group increases
Social loafing
The phenomenon in which individuals within a group or team put forth less than 100% effort because of losses in motivation
Conditions that enhance the probability of social loafing
Output cannot my independently evaluated, meaningless task, low individual involvement, strangers on team, coworkers seen as high ability, perception of redundancy and a perceived weaker opponent
Ways of reducing social loafing
Emphasise unique contributions, increase identifiability, determine situations where loafing may occur, conduct individual meetings, assign positions and divide the team into smaller units
Cohesion
A dynamic process that is reflected in the tendency for a group to stick together and remain united in pursuit of its instrumental objectives and for the satisfaction of member affective needs
Underscored notion is that cohesion is
Multidimensional, dynamic, instrumental and affective
Distinct forces of cohesion
Attractiveness of group and means control
Task cohesion
The degree to which members work together to achieve common goals and objectives
Social cohesion
Reflects the interpersonal attraction amount group members
Conceptual model of cohesion
Carron and colleagues, 4 major affectors are environmental factors (normative forces), personal factors, leadership factors and team factors
Sport cohesiveness questionnaire
Seven items that measure interpersonal attraction or attraction to group. No reliability
Multidimensional sport cohesion instrument
4 dimensions- attraction to group, unity of purpose, quality of teamwork and how the members perceive the group
GEQ- group environment questionnaire
Used. Developed on members perception of the group as a whole and a members personal attraction to the group. 4 constructs- group integration (task and social) and individual attraction to the group (task and social)
Sociograms
A tool to measure social cohesion that discloses affiliation amongst group members. Confidential questionnaire.
Relationship between cohesion and performance
Hard to determine the direction of causality
Things that affect cohesion
Adherence, conformity, social support, stability, group goals and norms, sacrifice, social loafing
Strategies for enhancing cohesion
Distinctiveness (kit), individual positions, group norms, individual sacrifices
Team-building model
Carrie and colleagues, run by a psych. And a coach to increase cohesion. 1) introductory stage
2) conceptual stage
3) practical stage
4) intervention stage
DESC formula for communicatin
Describe, express, specify and noting the consequence
Things coaches can do to increase cohesion
Explain individual roles in success, encourage group identity, avoid social cliques, avoid excessive turnover, enhance team efficacy and get to know your team
Barriers to group cohesion
Clash of personalities, conflict of task or social roles, breakdown in communication, power struggle or disagreement on goals
What group members can do to increase cohesion
Get to know each other, help each other and create team spirit, positive reinforcement, be honest in communication, resolve conflicts and give 100% effort
Team cohesion
A dynamic process reflected in the groups tendency to stick together whilst persuing it’s goals
Why injury occurs
Competition, high speed and confined space, physical and illegal contact, psychological factors may play a role
Physical factors of injury model
Muscle imbalance, high speed collision, overtraining and physical fatigue
Psychological factors of injury model
Stress, personality factors and predisposing attitude
The stress and injury model
Williams and Anderson 1988
Stress response
Athletes cognitive appraisal of situational demands, which will influence physiological, emotional and psychological response.
Links to history of stressors, coping resources and personality
Personality factors affecting injury
Risk taking, optimism, apprehensiveness, trait anxiety and hardiness
Coping resources
Social support, problem coping, emotional coping and approach coping
Problem coping
Think about it and deal with it
Emotional coping
Trying to relax