Exam 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Martin Luther on justification

A

Justification is a once-for-all declaration, Righteousness is external to us (alien righteousness), “Justification by faith alone” but justification leads to sanctification, We are assured of our salvation
Being made righteous in the sight of God, justification was imputed, a gift not earned, it is reckoned to us, it is external “alien righteousness”, and justification and sanctification are separate processes. Believed sinners are accepted due to the righteousness of God. Justification by faith alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Anselm of Canterbury - Cur Deus homo - on atonement

A

Anselm of Canterbury viewed atonement through the satisfaction theory, arguing that humanity’s sin dishonored God, creating a debt that only a being both divine and human—Christ—could satisfy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

John Calvin on scripture and tradition, providence, predestination, church and
sacraments

A

John Calvin emphasized sola scriptura, viewing Scripture as the supreme authority over church traditions. He believed in God’s providence, asserting that God actively sustains and governs all creation. Calvin’s doctrine of predestination taught that God elects some for salvation and others for damnation, emphasizing God’s sovereignty. Regarding the church, Calvin saw it as the community of believers, essential for spiritual growth, and upheld two sacraments: baptism and the Lord’s Supper, which he viewed as means of grace but not means of salvation in themselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The Council of Trent on scripture, tradition, justification and the church.

A

The Roman church did not encourage texts to be translated into the vernacular of the people. The stance at Trent was that the Latin text was good enough and did not permit the translations. People had to rely on their priests.

Council of Trent said there was tradition outside of scripture that had authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The Radical Reformers on scripture and tradition, church and sacraments

A

The Radical Reformers prioritized scripture alone (sola scriptura) and rejected church traditions not explicitly supported by the Bible. They believed in a pure, voluntary church made up of true believers who demonstrated their faith through repentance and commitment. They practiced believer’s baptism instead of infant baptism, viewing it as a symbol of personal faith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Huldrych Zwingli on the Lord’s supper and baptism

A

Huldrych Zwingli viewed the Lord’s Supper as a symbolic act rather than a literal presence of Christ, emphasizing it as a memorial to remember Christ’s sacrifice. He rejected the idea of transubstantiation and consubstantiation, focusing on the spiritual connection and communal remembrance. Regarding baptism, Zwingli saw it as an outward sign of an individual’s commitment to the Christian faith, not a means of salvation. He believed it marked inclusion in the faith community but did not impart saving grace.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sources of theology (scripture and
tradition)

A

The primary sources of theology are Scripture and tradition. Scripture is considered the foundational and authoritative text for Christian beliefs and teachings. Tradition refers to the accumulated teachings, practices, and interpretations handed down through generations within the Church, providing context and depth to understanding Scripture. The balance between these sources varies across Christian denominations, with some prioritizing sola scriptura (Scripture alone), while others integrate tradition more equally in theological reflection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The doctrine of grace (justification)

A

The doctrine of grace, particularly in the context of justification, asserts that humans are made righteous before God not by their own works but through God’s grace alone. Justification is received through faith in Jesus Christ’s atoning sacrifice. This teaching emphasizes that salvation is a gift from God, unearned and freely given, highlighting the transformative power of divine grace in reconciling humanity to God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The doctrine of sacraments

A

The doctrine of sacraments is about special religious ceremonies that Jesus started to help believers receive God’s grace. These are acts that use physical things, like water or bread and wine, to show deeper spiritual meanings. The most common sacraments are baptism, which welcomes someone into the Christian faith, and the Lord’s Supper (communion), which remembers Jesus’ sacrifice. In some churches, there are more sacraments, like marriage or confession. Sacraments are important for worship and help people feel connected to God and their faith.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The doctrine of the church

A

The doctrine of the church teaches that the church is the community of Christians who follow Jesus. It’s both a spiritual group and a place where believers gather for worship, learn, and support each other. The church’s purpose is to share Jesus’ message and help people grow in their faith.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  1. What is the connection between the human predicament and God’s reconciling action?
    Use an example from the atonement theories we studied
A

The human predicament refers to humanity’s separation from God due to sin. God’s reconciling action, such as through the atonement, addresses this by restoring the relationship. For example, in Anselm’s satisfaction theory, humanity’s sin dishonored God, creating a debt that only Christ, being both divine and human, could pay, thus reconciling humanity to God. This act of atonement bridges the gap caused by sin and restores the connection between God and people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  1. What are the differences between Luther’s account of justification and that given at the
    Council of Trent?
A

Luther believed that people are made right with God by faith alone, not by doing good works. He saw justification as a free gift from God.

The Council of Trent, however, taught that both faith and good works are needed for justification. They believed justification is a process that involves faith, sacraments, and living a good life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  1. What is the difference between the understanding of the role of tradition held by the medieval theologians and that declared by the Council of Trent?
A

Medieval theologians viewed tradition as an important source of authority alongside Scripture, with both Scripture and Church teachings guiding faith and practice.

The Council of Trent, however, declared that tradition, along with Scripture, is equally authoritative and that both together form the basis for Church teachings. Trent emphasized that Church tradition, particularly the teachings and practices passed down through the Church, had a vital role in interpreting Scripture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  1. What is the difference between the understanding of the role of tradition held by the Reformers of the Magisterial Reformation and those of the Radical Reformation?
A

The Reformers of the Magisterial Reformation, like Martin Luther and John Calvin, saw tradition as important but believed it should be guided by Scripture. They accepted some church traditions, as long as they were in line with the Bible.

The Radical Reformation, on the other hand, rejected many traditional practices and church authority, emphasizing a return to the teachings of the New Testament. They believed that traditions could hinder true Christian practice and sought a simpler, more direct relationship with God based solely on Scripture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  1. How does Calvin’s understanding of divine accommodation address the humanness of
    the Biblical texts?
A

Calvin’s concept of divine accommodation suggests that God, in His wisdom, communicated in ways humans could understand. He believed that the Bible, while divinely inspired, was written using human language, culture, and concepts. This means that God adapted His message to the limitations of human understanding. Calvin argued that this humanness in the Bible did not diminish its divine authority but made it accessible and relevant to people of all times and places.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  1. Why, according to Migliore, is the Bible not just a devotional text?
A

According to Migliore, the Bible is not just a devotional text because it is also a witness to God’s actions in history and a source of theological reflection. It contains not only personal, spiritual guidance but also teaches about God’s covenant with humanity, addresses societal issues, and challenges readers to think deeply about faith, justice, and God’s kingdom. The Bible’s purpose extends beyond individual devotion to shaping communities and cultures in accordance with God’s will.

17
Q
  1. What, according to Calvin, is the connection between creation and providence?
A

According to Calvin, creation and providence are closely connected in that God is the Creator who not only made the world but continues to sustain and govern it through His providence. Creation is the beginning of God’s work, and providence is God’s ongoing care and control over everything in creation. Calvin believed that God’s providence ensures that all events, both good and bad, ultimately serve His divine purpose, demonstrating God’s active involvement in the world at all times.

18
Q
  1. Why is the doctrine of providence a comforting doctrine, according to Calvin?
A

According to Calvin, the doctrine of providence is comforting because it assures believers that God is always in control, actively governing all aspects of life. This means that nothing happens by chance, and even in difficult or uncertain times, God is working for the good of His people. Believers can find peace knowing that God’s wisdom, power, and goodness are behind every event, and that He cares for and protects His creation. This trust in God’s providence provides hope and stability in life’s challenges.

19
Q
  1. How, according to Calvin and Augustine, does predestination affirm the grace of God?
A

According to Calvin and Augustine, predestination affirms the grace of God by emphasizing that salvation is entirely God’s work and not based on any merit or action of the individual. Both believed that God, in His sovereign grace, chooses who will be saved (the elect) and who will not (the reprobate), independent of anything the individual does. This highlights God’s unearned favor, showing that salvation is a gift of grace, not something humans can earn or deserve. Predestination underscores the dependence of humanity on God’s mercy and divine will for salvation.

20
Q
  1. Name and describe three different views of Christ’s presence in the Lord’s Supper.
A
  1. Transubstantiation (Roman Catholic view): In this view, during the Eucharist, the bread and wine are believed to change in substance into the actual body and blood of Christ, although their outward appearance remains the same. Christ is fully present in both the bread and the wine.
  2. Consubstantiation (Lutheran view): Lutherans believe that the bread and wine remain truly bread and wine, but Christ’s body and blood are present alongside them. The physical elements are not transformed but are united with Christ’s body and blood in a mysterious way during the sacrament.
  3. Symbolic or Memorial (Reformed/Protestant view): In this view, the bread and wine are symbols that point to the body and blood of Christ. Christ’s presence is seen spiritually rather than physically, and the Lord’s Supper serves as a memorial, reminding believers of Christ’s sacrifice and a way to strengthen their faith.
21
Q

Essay Compare 2-3 different models of the atonement developed in the Middle Ages. What are
the strengths and weaknesses of each, and which do you find most compelling?

A

Comparing Models of Atonement in the Middle Ages

In the Middle Ages, different thinkers developed various models to explain how Christ’s death reconciles humanity with God. Three prominent views are Anselm’s Satisfaction Theory, Abelard’s Moral Influence Theory, and Aquinas’ Penal Substitution Theory. Each has its strengths and weaknesses.

Anselm’s Satisfaction Theory suggests that Christ’s death was necessary to pay the debt of sin and restore God’s honor. This view highlights God’s justice but can feel too focused on legal language, making it seem more like a transaction than an act of love.

Abelard’s Moral Influence Theory argues that Christ’s death shows God’s love and serves as an example for humans to follow. It emphasizes the relational and transformative power of love but can be criticized for downplaying the seriousness of sin and why Christ’s death was needed in the first place.

Aquinas’ Penal Substitution Theory combines both justice and mercy. Christ suffers punishment for sin, but this act also reflects God’s love. While it balances God’s justice and mercy, it might still feel too focused on punishment rather than love.

Of these, I find Abelard’s theory most compelling because it focuses on God’s love and the personal transformation Christ’s death inspires. However, a full understanding of atonement might blend the best aspects of all three views, acknowledging both the love and justice involved in Christ’s sacrifice.

22
Q

EssayDoes the principle of divine accommodation help or hinder our approach to scripture?
Why or why not? Does it affect the way we understand God’s inspiration of scripture?

A

The principle of divine accommodation can both help and hinder our approach to Scripture, depending on how it is understood. It helps by offering a way to recognize that Scripture was written in human language and cultural contexts, which makes it more accessible and understandable for us. By acknowledging that God used human authors to communicate His message, divine accommodation emphasizes that Scripture is both divine and human, allowing us to engage with it in a meaningful way.

However, it could also hinder our approach if it leads to the belief that the human elements of Scripture somehow diminish its divine authority. If we focus too much on the cultural or historical limitations of the texts, we might downplay the inspiration and truthfulness of God’s message.

Divine accommodation does affect the way we understand God’s inspiration of Scripture. It suggests that God’s message is still fully inspired, even though He used human means to communicate it. God’s truth is conveyed in ways that humans can understand, but the divine purpose remains intact. So, rather than seeing divine accommodation as diminishing God’s inspiration, it can deepen our understanding of how God worked through human authors to bring His message to the world.