Exam 1 Flashcards
Task of theology
- God walk and God talk. Speach and action. Proclamation.
Arian controversy/Council of Nicaea 325
Arius argues Jesus was not divine, Son was begotten by God the Father (also Jesus doesn’t fully know God so we cannot know God). Said Jesus was not co-eternal with the Father. Vs. Athanasius.
Apollinarian Controversy
Apollinaris Jesus was a divine being in a human body. He had a divine mind, and therefore was not fully human. Vs. Gregory of Nazianzus.
Pelagian controversy
Pelagius vs Augustine. Pelagius believes no original sin, so humans can live righteously, grace is not necessary for obedience/salvation. Augustine believed in original sin from Adam, free will and moral liberty (after fall our will is still good, but our judgement is skewed to sin) only way for liberty to be restored is with God’s grace.
What is the task of theology? How does that task relate to the Bible, the Church, and
Jesus Christ?
The church must be willing to examine its proclamation and practices to determine their faithfulness to the gospel of Jesus Christ that is the basis and norm of the church’s life and mission.
The church’s test to see its true God talk and God walk. The church uses the Bible to see if it is accurately following Jesus.
According to Peter Enns, how does the nature of faith in the New Testament differ from
“correct thinking” about God?
Faith allows us to fully trust God, love and show commitment. “Correct thinking” is using theology and “God talk” which can lead to idolatry and focusing on the wrong things. Saving faith is about the relationship with God, not head knowledge.
What spurred the early Christians to reflect on the nature of Jesus?
Christians were praying to Jesus already and so they wanted to look into what Jesus’ nature was. Christians were monotheistic, so was Jesus the only God?
Lay out Athanasius’ soteriological argument for Jesus’ divinity.
a. Only God can save
b. Jesus Christ saves
c. Therefore, Jesus Christ is God
What did Apollinaris teach about Jesus’s humanity, and how did he reason to this
position?
*Apollinaris taught that Jesus had a human body but lacked a human soul, which he believed was replaced by the divine Logos.
This view was rejected for undermining the full humanity of Christ.
If he did not take up a human mind, he woudlnt have healed the human mind
Lay out Gregory of Nazianzus’s argument for Jesus’ full humanity.
a. Only what Jesus assumed incarnate can be redeemed
b. If Christ did not possess a human mind, humanity is not fully redeemed
c. Therefore, Christ possessed a human mind and was fully human
Briefly state Pelagius’ positions concerning human freedom, sin, and grace.
Pelagius said Christians were becoming lazy, we have complete free will, have the ability to not sin, and the commandments are God’s grace to us.
Briefly state Augustine’s positions concerning human freedom, sin, and grace.
a. Only what Jesus assumed incarnate can be redeemed
b. If Christ did not possess a human mind, humanity is not fully redeemed
c. Therefore, Christ possessed a human mind and was fully human
Do you agree with Enns that good theology, “correct thinking” about God, is different
from saving faith? If not, why not? If so, then what is the point of theology? Refer to his
argument from scripture as you answer this question.
*Yes, I agree with Enns that good theology, or “correct thinking” about God, is different from saving faith. Enns argues that having the right ideas about God doesn’t necessarily mean someone has true faith. For example, in James 2:19, it says even demons believe in God, but that doesn’t mean they are saved. Saving faith is more about trust, relationship, and living according to God’s will, not just knowing facts about Him.
The point of theology, then, is to help us understand God better, but it’s not a replacement for genuine faith. Theology can guide us, give clarity to our beliefs, and help us avoid errors, but ultimately, it’s living out that faith—trusting and following God—that really matters.
What difference does it make whether we consider Christian theological statements to
be divinely given, perfect, and eternal, or human works that are able to be corrected?
Relate your answer to the task of theology as we defined it in class.
*If we see Christian theological statements as divinely given, perfect, and eternal, then we would believe they can’t be questioned or changed. This means theology is about understanding and following those set truths exactly as they are. On the other hand, if we view theological statements as human works that can be corrected, it means we can improve or adjust our understanding of God as we learn more or as our world changes.
In class, we defined theology as the study of God and how we understand Him. If theology is open to correction, it becomes a process of learning and growing in our understanding of God. If it’s unchangeable, theology is more about protecting and maintaining what has already been established.
According to Luke 2:52, “Jesus grew in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and
man.” How can we make sense of Jesus’ growth in wisdom as Christians who believe
that Jesus is fully God?
-Jesus is fully human, so he would have grown like a human in mind and body.
-Gregory of Nazianzus- the unassumed is the unhealed
-Athanasius- Only God can save us, Jesus saves us, Jesus is God.
-hypostatic union- Jesus is one one person in 2 natures