Exam 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Reynolds v. United States (1879)

A

Issue: Criminalizing bigamy (practice of polygamy) among Mormons.
Decision: Prohibition of polygamy upheld.
Reasons: Protecting religious beliefs shouldn’t undermine the law.
First Amendment Analysis: Free Exercise Clause, Rational Basis Test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Everson v. Board of Education (1947)

A

Issue: Reimbursement of transportation costs for private schools, mostly Catholic.
Decision: Law did not violate the Constitution; no direct support for religion.
Reasons: Aims to assist parents of all religions, not to endorse a specific faith.
First Amendment Analysis: Establishment Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943)

A

Issue: Compelling students to salute the flag.
Decision: Compelling students to salute the flag is unconstitutional.
Reasons: The First Amendment protects against enforced unanimity of opinion.
First Amendment Analysis: Freedom of Speech.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sherbert v. Verner (1963)

A

Issue: Firing of an employee for refusing to work on her Sabbath.
Decision: Free Exercise Clause prohibits such employment practices.
Reasons: Significant burden on the individual’s ability to freely exercise faith.
First Amendment Analysis: Free Exercise Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Employment Division v. Smith (1990)

A

Issue: Firing for using peyote in a religious ceremony.
Decision: Firing upheld; religious beliefs don’t excuse compliance with valid laws.
Reasons: Distinguishing between beliefs and practices; general law application.
First Amendment Analysis: Free Exercise Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Engel v. Vitale (1962)

A

Issue: Voluntary prayer at the start of school day.
Decision: Prayer violated the Establishment Clause.
Reasons: Breached the separation between church and state.
First Amendment Analysis: Establishment Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Fulton v. Philadelphia (2020)

A

Issue: Catholic Social Services barred from foster care for not certifying same-sex couples.
Decision: The city’s action violated the Free Exercise Clause.
Reasons: City actions burdened CSS’s religious exercise without justification.
First Amendment Analysis: Free Exercise Clause & Free Speech Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Lee v. Weisman (1992)

A

Issue: Inclusion of clergy offering prayers at public school ceremonies.
Decision: Government may not compose official prayers for school events.
Reasons: Coercion and indirect establishment of religion.
First Amendment Analysis: Establishment Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018)

A

Issue: Refusal to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding.
Decision: Baker’s conduct protected by the Free Exercise Clause.
Reasons: Hostility towards the baker’s religious beliefs.
First Amendment Analysis: Free Exercise Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)

A

Issue: State funding for non-secular, non-public education.
Decision: Rhode Island statute unconstitutional due to excessive entanglement.
Reasons: Must pass the Lemon test to avoid violating the Establishment Clause.
First Amendment Analysis: Establishment Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Town of Greece v. Galloway (2014)

A

Issue: Prayer at town hall meetings.
Decision: Legislative prayer does not violate the Establishment Clause.
Reasons: Long tradition of permissible legislative prayer; no coercion.
First Amendment Analysis: Establishment Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer (2017)

A

Issue: Exclusion of church from secular aid program.
Decision: Exclusion violates the Free Exercise Clause.
Reasons: Discrimination based on religious character.
First Amendment Analysis: Free Exercise Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EEOC (2012)

A

Issue: Firing a teacher under the ministerial exception.
Decision: Ministerial exception applies; prevents state interference in church governance.
Reasons: Perich’s role as a minister outweighed secular aspects of her job.
First Amendment Analysis: Establishment and Free Exercise Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Bremerton School District v. Kennedy (2022)

A

Issue: Coach praying during school sports activities.
Decision: Coach’s prayer protected by the Free Exercise and Free Speech Clauses.
Reasons: Prohibition based on religious character burdened free exercise.
First Amendment Analysis: Free Exercise and Free Speech Clauses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah (1993)

A

Issue: City ordinance prohibiting animal sacrifice for religious worship.
Decision: Ordinances were unconstitutional; targeted religious practices.
Reasons: Ordinances not neutral or generally applicable.
First Amendment Analysis: Free Exercise Clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) (1993)

A

Provision: Protects religious exercise unless a compelling state interest is demonstrated.
Standard: Applies strict scrutiny to laws burdening religious practices.
Scope: Initially applied to federal law and later adopted by some states.

17
Q

American Legion v. American Humanist Association (2019)

A

Issue: Constitutionality of a 40-foot cross in a memorial park.
Decision: The cross does not violate the Establishment Clause.
Reasons: Historical importance beyond Christian symbolism.
First Amendment Analysis: Establishment Clause; Criticism of Lemon Test.

18
Q

What’s the Lemon test?

A

(1) the primary purpose of the assistance is secular,
(2) neither promote nor inhibit religion,
(3) there is no excessive entanglement between church and state.