exam 2 Flashcards
self-concept
-what you understand about yourself
-it forms the answer to “who I”
-this concept is multi-faceted: traits, roles, a nationality, role, college student, hobbies, interests (a reader), occupations
3 metaphors for how the self emerges
- social actor
- motivated agent
- autobiographical author
social actor
-enacts roles and displays traits by performing behaviors in the presence of others
-try to change TRAITS OR ROLES
motivated agent
-acts upon inner desires and formulates goals, values, and plant to guide behavior in the future
-want to change something ABOUT YOURSELF (like values or goals)
autobiographical author
-takes stock of life to create a story about who I am, how I came to be, and where my life may be going
-involves achieving a sense of temporal continuity in life (how my past self has developed into my present self, and how my present self will develop into an envisioned future self)
narrative identity
evolving story of the self that reconstructs the past and anticipates the future to provide a life with unity, meaning, and purpose
redemptive narratives
-track the move from suffering to an enhanced status or sate
-protagonist who journeys forth into dangerous and unredeemed world
William James
-How I became the person I am becoming
-the self is both I and Me
-self= the knower and what the knower knows when the knower reflects upon itself
Charles Taylor
-the self is a reflexive project
-we try to manage, discipline, refine, or improve the self
Ego
-Freud
-an executive self in the personality
-
Big 5
- extraversion
- neuroticism
- agreeableness
- conscientiousness
- openness to experience
traits
perceived consistencies in social performance
roles
capture the important structured relationships
social reputation =
traits + roles
Theory of Mind
-Wellman (1993)
-developed around age of 4, child’s understanding that the other people have minds, which are located desires and beliefs, and that motivates behavior
ability to infer another’s mental state and use this info to explain to explain and predict human behavior
The age 5-to-7 shift
cognitive and social changes that happen in the early elementary school years that result in children becoming more playful, intentional, and goal-oriented in their pursuit of approach to life
sets stage as motivated agent
Working memory
-can only hold so many things in memory at one time (what we can consciously perceive)
-what you’re thinking about in that moment
working self-concept
only a small subset of knowledge about the self can be activated at any given point in time
self-esteem
the overall opinion/ feeling towards ourselves
2 components of self esteem
1.) affective (a feeling) usually feel sad if low SE
2.) cognitive (a judgement) like a 1-7 scale “i dont think im a good person”
what is an unstable high self esteem more susceptible to?
ego threats ——–> aggression
narcissim
people sometimes attracted to the confidence
inflated self esteem: prone to aggression and poor interpersonal adjustment
SWANN
self-verification theory–>
-explains why some people strive to have a high self-esteem and some a low self-esteem. we like other people to verify what we think of ourselves.
contingency of self worth theory
where our self esteem derives from
what are the 2 social biases?
- downward social comparison: compare oneself to people or groups that are worse off than you leads to SELF-ENHANCEMENT EFFECT
- upward social comparison: compare oneself to people or groups that are better off than you
self-serving bias
tendency to perceive oneself favorably
examples of self-serving biases
- unrealistic optimist
- false consensus effect
- false uniqueness effect
- self-serving attributions
- better than revenge effect
- self-handicapping
- basking in reflected glory
False consensus effect
tendency to overestimate how common something is
- “everybody does it”
False uniqueness effect
tendency to overestimate the commonality of one’s abilities and one’s desirable or successful behaviors
-“Im special”
Self-serving attributions
attributing positive outcomes to oneself and negative outcomes to other factors
-“I won at scrabble because of my skill”
-I lost at scrabble because I got stuck with Qs and Zs and they got lucky with a triple word score”
Better than average effect
80-90% of people they are better than average in something
Self-handicapping
creating obstacles so that potential failure can be blamed on external factors aka self sabotage
BERGLAS & JONES 1978
-Participants told they would have difficulty with test preferred to take performance reducing drug rather than enhancing (placebo)
-Afraid their true selves would show
-If they fail = drug
-If succeed= did so in spite of the drug
Basking in reflected glory (BIRG-ing)
We associate ourselves with successful people and adopting their success as your own
Cialdini 1976: students are more likely to wear school apparel
“we “ won the game vs. “they” lost it
social comparison theory and its 2 components
people come to know about themselves by comparing themselves with others
1. Social norms and the opinions of others- compare when our own self-evaluation is unclear
2. Abilities and performance- here self evaluations driven by desire to become better
counterfactual
“what might have been”
Medvec, Madey, Gilovich- bronze medalists were actually happier than silver medalists
Consequences of social comparison
-can impact self-esteem
-feelings of regret
-feelings of envy
-behavioral consequences
SEM (self-evaluation maintenance model)
-Tesser 1988
-builds on social comparison theory and points to a range of psychological forces that help and maintain our self-esteem
1.) psychological closeness of another
2.) relative performance of that other
3.) relevance of the performance
-suggests managers may prefer less than optimal candidates who aren’t likely to challenge their standing in the org
cognitive accessibility
-the activation potential of available knowledge
-info that is ready to be used
priming
-making concepts temporarily (or chronically) accessible
-make us think about certain things
self-complexity
extent to which individuals have many different and relatively different ways of thinking about themselves
simplification strategies
we look for ways to not think about things too much
-heuristics
-confirmation bias
-magical thinking
- social cognition
-schemas
heuristics
-rules of thumb to simplify judgements/ processing
-mechanism for solving problems.
-ignore actual probabilities
representativeness heuristics
tendency to judge the frequency of likelihood of an event by the extent that it resembles a typical case