Exam 2 Flashcards
(123 cards)
History of Meat Inspection
meat inspection is not a new concept
ancient examples include France (1162), England (1319), Germany (1385)
American Meat Inspection history
early on there was little central control of meat
the novel Jungle highlighted unsanitary conditions in Slaughter Chicago Slaughterhouses
the novel causes uproar leading to the 1906 passage of the Federal Meat Inspection Act
Upton Sinclair
wrote the novel Jungle, also a socialist
was considered a muckbreaker trying to shine a bad light on capitalism. unintentionally shined a light on how bad slaughterhouses were
Federal Meat Inspection Act
1) antemortem inspection: beef, sheep, goats, pigs, horses (mules)
2) postmortem inspection of every carcass
3) sanitary standards
4) USDA authorized to monitor and inspect
-does not include poultry since they were not raised commercially at the time. Poultry were later protected 1957 poultry products inspection act
Humane Slaughter Act
passed in 1958 revised in 1978
all animals must be stunned
religious slaughter is exempt
no poultry is included: because with poultry handling its common to shackle them upside down while alive
FSIS is responsible for inspection and enforcement
313.2 Humane Slaughter Act: Handling
handling of livestock: (a) driving of livestock from the unloading ramps to the holding pens and from the holding pens to the stunning area shall be done with a minimum of excitement and discomfort to the animals. livestock shall not be forced to move faster than a normal walking speed.
313.15 Humane Slaughter Act: captive bolt
mechanical; captive bolt: (a) Application of stunners, required effect; handling. (1) The captive bolt stunners shall be applied to the livestock in accordance with this section so as to produce immediate unconsciousness in the animals before they are shackled, hoisted, thrown, cast, or cut. The animals shall be stunned in a manner that they will be rendered unconsciousness with a minimum of excitement and discomfort
Whole Some Meat (1967) and Wholesome Poultry Products Act
aimed to make all state inspection systems at least equal to the federal inspection system
if a state can not or will not comply FSIS must take over
Amendment to the Federal Meat Inspection Act
Improvements to Livestock Handling
guidelines to improve animal welfare and handling to comply with HSA
the target audience is small and very small establishments: small plants typically do a worse job than big plants because they have less expertise
Systematic approach versus Robust Systematic Approach
-Oct 2013 FSIS compliance Guide for a Systematic Approach to the Humane Handling of Livestock
Code of Federal Regulations Title 9- Animals and Animal Products. Chapter I
parts 1-99 = Animal and PLant Health Inspection Service
Code of Federal Regulations Title 9- Animals and Animal Products. Chapter II
Parts 200-205 = grain inspection, packers and stock yards administration (packers & stockyard programs
Code of Federal Regulations Title 9- Animals and Animal Products. Chapter III
parts 300-599 = Food Safety & Inspection Service
Food Safety and Inspection Service Responsibilities (12)
1-4 Sluaghter
1)antemortem inspection
2) humane methods
3) postmortem inspection
4) product inspection
5) assurance that all plants adopt and use HACCP
6) assurance that all SSOP’s are practiced by personal
7) verification of HACCP system effectiveness (salmonella performance standards)
8) over sight of plant generic E. coli testing protocols
9)laboratory determinations & assays
10) control & restriction of condemned products
11) marketing labelling & inspection insignia
12) facilities construction & operational sanitation
1993 Jack-in-the-box outbreak
732 people infected with E. coli O157:H7 from beef patties
73 jack-in-the-box locations in CA, ID, WA,NA
4 children died and 178 others left with permanent injury including kidney and brain damage
-caused the Final RUle Pathogen Reduction and Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (1996) to be passed
Final Rule Pathogen Reduction and Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (1996)
plants must adopt and follow Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures (SSOP’s)
plants must adopt HACCP as a system of process controls to prevent safety hazards
plants must meet pathogen Reduction Performance Standards set by USDA-FSIS for salmonella
plants must conduct tests for generic E. coli to verify that their process-control system prevents fecal contamination
-1st big change to the Federal Meat Inspection Safety Act of 1906
Hazard type by percent
of the 3 hazard types concerning foodborne illness biological (pathogens) are of the greatest concern
4% chemical hazards
2% physical hazards
94% biological hazards
Biological Foodborne Illness in US
Norovirus: has the most cases annualy
salmonella has second most
listeria monocytogenes ranked 24 but is most deadly and causes the most deaths annually
Foodborne Illness in US outcomes
48 million people get sick
128,000 are hospitalized
3,000 die annually
foodborne illnesses affect on the economy
foodborne illnesses (dr. visits, lost work days, etc.) cost $ 152 billion annually in the US
global burden of foodborne illness is 33 million disability adjusted life years (DALYs)
children under 5 years old 40% of this burden
Foodborne illness disproportianately affects
young <6 years
old> 65 years
Immuno-compromised
pregnant (listeria)
Who measures food safety
FoodNET: reports data collected to CDC, they determine where, and how many cases of foodborne illness occur from specific foods (if possible)
Zero Tolerance (adultered) Vs. Performance Standards
E. coli O157:H7/ STEC “big six” is adultered (0 tolerance) in ground beef
listeria monocytogenes-ZT RTE is adultered (0 tolerance)
Salmonella spp. has a performance standard
pathogens
a bacteria or other microorganism that can cause disease
indicator bacteria
bacteria whose presence indicates the likelihood of a pathogen
often spoilage bacteria