exam Flashcards
broad definition of gangs
A Broad Definition
“A group of youths or young adults in your jurisdiction that you or other responsible persons in your agency or community are willing to identify or classify as a gang.”
(USA, National Gang Intelligence Centre)
Subjective definition
Specific definition of gangs
Ownership of a name
Wearing of colours or other group symbols
Control of territory
Communal criminal activity, comitting crime with others
Identifiable leadership
A certain number of members
4 Levels of gangs (Wortley)
Level 1: Fluid friendship groups with sporadic criminal activity. Short lived and not that violent. “Wanna be” gangs (Gordon).
Level 2: Existed for more than a year. Criminal activities are planned and deliberate. Little specialization of criminal activities. Lack of formal leadership. More likely to engage in violence than level 1.
Level 3: Leadership and hierarchical structure and have existed for at least 1 year . Control a particular type of criminal activity in a defined territory (drug dealing) and violent. Colours and a name.
Level 4:Long, stable history and can span more than 1 generation. Sophisticated organizational structure. Often work with lower level gangs. Violent, make considerable sums of money (Mafia in Italy and Narco in Mexico)
Counting Gangs
Most often data from fbi/police
In USA “National Gang Intelligence Centre”
Gangs in over 1,000 jurisdictions in USA early 2000s
Estimated to be 25,000-30,000 gangs in USA
5 times more than in 1980
RCMP in 2018 reported 430 active gangs in Canada. A reliable statistic?
Sometimes data from school and street surveys are used
Why do gangs exist?
Early research in USA by Thrasher 1920s (documented activities of over 1,000 gangs in Chicago), much more gun violence now
Much less organized and criminal than today
Oftentimes youth do not join gangs for criminal reasons
Often-times for psychological or social reasons, at least at first (Social Disorganization Theory)
Risk Factors for gangs
Poverty
Poor School performance
Gangs present in community
Unstable Homes
Gangs provide a perceived solution to problems that young people face
Hagedorn: Milwaukee gang study
Today gangs are more criminal and institutionalized since 1980s
Decline of industry
Looked at how Cities in north east have been deindustrilized
Minority youth have tough time finding decent jobs in labour market
Young people remain gang members longer
Venkatesh: Chicago gang study
Gang activity in large African American Public Housing Project
Weak Civil Society that most take for granted: unstructured families, few legitimate jobs; not much hope in educational system
Most money comes from 2 sources: welfare cheques and selling drugs
Working for a gang is a rational choice taking into consideration these constraints
Gangs also function as bankers; employers; police; social needs (driving elderly to medical appointments and voters to polling stations).
Camorra in Campania (Naples) Italy. (Gomorrah, Roberto Saviano) gangs
Been around since 1860s
Grew out of prisons like Poggioreale
Mafia and gangs serve similar functions in poor societies with weak governments
Gangs lend money to people in the community
Act as police
$ Support wives whose husbands are in prison
See Gomorrah by Roberto Saviano (book and film)
Reacting to Gangs
Prevention (environment and opportunities)
Intervention (draw away from the gang with education; job training)
Suppression (policing [raids] & Laws) most common
Early Research on homeless youth
100 years ago there were homeless youth : called street urchins
Issue not on radar until late 1970s early 1980s; largely results from changes in canadian housing policies, housing became less affordable, less affordable housing built
Drew attention:terms used; runaways and throughaways, rather than “homeless”
Runaway; ran away from home
Throughaways; told to leave home, most were throughaways
First to talk about touth homelessness; Badgley Report (1986) on sexual exploitation of Canadian children: many people involved in sex trade were homeless and had been involved with child protection
About ½ were involved in the Child Protection System
Broader Definition of homelessness for youth
Precariously housed (couch surfing); not paying rent
Sleeping in youth Shelters, emergency shelters in large cities
Tents, cars, abandoned buildings , roof tops etc.
16-24
Homeless and <16: child protection, not shelters
Hagan and McCarthy (Mean Streets, 1997) study
Interviewed 400 street youth in toronto, asked questions through SRS, looked at what predicts why some street youth get involved in crime and some don’t, explanation for deviant behaviour; drug selling, prostitution, and theft
Focus on explaining crime among street youth
Is it due to their backgrounds (strain and control)?
or
Is it due to the situational adversity they face?
Findings reveal that familial and school factors have minimal influence on current criminal behavior.
Instead, criminal behavior is influenced by such immediate factors such as: lack of stable housing, drug and alcohol use, and criminal peers who engage in illegal activities.
Criminal behavior is also influenced by a lack of income, job experiences, and perceptions of a blocked opportunity structure (felt not to be their fault).
More likely to be involved in crime if they blamed external factors rather than themselves for why they ended up on the streets
What about non-criminal money making? O’Grady and Gaetz: Main Way of Making $
Job: high school grads; left home 16+
Soc. Assistance.: females, young mothers
Begging/panhandling: left home young
Squeegee: did not finish high school
Sex work: 13.5 age left home, female, no H.S. abuse, Indigenous
Crime: male, poor growing up, came from T.O
Victimization of street youth
Often Street Youth are viewed as criminals, yet research from Toronto shows that:
76% reporting at least one instance of criminal victimization in the previous 12 months.
almost three quarters (72.8%) reporting multiple incidents of victimization.
63.6% report being victims of violent crime at least once, while only 56.5% report being victims of property crime.
A very high percentage (23%) report that they do not tell anyone, even friends, when they have been victimized.
This is a reflection of the isolation that often comes with being homeless, and the weakness of social networks that young people are able to rely on when in crisis.
Amongst female street youth, black females were much more likely to report being victims of sexual assault (47%) than were white females (33%).
Sexual orientation was a significant factor in determining victimization, with LGBTQ+ female youth more likely to report being victims of most forms of crime (including both property and violent crimes), and on more occasions.
Sixty percent of LGBTQ+ female youth report being victims of sexual assault during the past year.
This group is perhaps the most victimized of the street youth population.
What to do? homeless youth
A balanced response to youth homelessness would emphasize three key elements: preventive measures, an emergency response, and efforts to move young people quickly out of homelessness.
RECENT RESEARCH; Homelessness and Self-Identity
Methods of study (1,103 youth, 57 agencies)
Do you consider yourself to be homeless?
Objective vs Subjective
1/3 yes
1/3 used to be, but not now
1/3 no
Even though all were using services for homeless youth (they were all objectively homeless)
Why these differences?
Those who were told to leave home
Been homeless several times in past 3 years
Been a recent victim of violence
Sleeping rough
Males
Youth think of themselves as individuals not belonging to a stigmatized group (the homeless)
Male vs Female charges
In Canada, for youth charged by police:
77% male 23% female
Females mostly theft under $5,000 and
Assault 1
Early Research male vs female youth crime
Lack of attention before 1970s
A “delinquent” was seen as a “rouge
male”
Thomas “The Unadjusted Girl” 1923
Case studies, mostly prostitution related
Girls used wrong means to achieve right
goals
They were not properly socialized (lacked
controls)
Basically a version of Social
Disorganization Theory
Were Girls becoming more violent in
1960s-1970s?
Popular perceptions based on serious, but
rare cases covered extensively in the
mass media
Liberation hypothesis (Adler, 1975;
Simon, 1975)
Labour market participation and post
secondary education
Advances in Post-Secondary Education
Moving into male dominated fields
Rise of the women’s movement
Women had more control over their bodies due to
birth control (The Birth Control Pill)
what types of girls get into trouble with the law:
poor, abused, marginalized and socially exclude
Power Control Theory (Hagan, Gillis and
Simpson)
Based on survey data from high school
students in late 1970s early 1980s
Patriarchal and Egalitarian Families
Blaming mothers?
Refers to John Hagan and colleagues’ integrated (conflict and social control theories) and feminist- informed explanation of the role of gender socialization in crime distributions.
Hagan, Gillis, and Simpson, who developed power-control theory, a variant of social control theory, suggest that patriarchal families are structured such that they support, and thus provide greater access for, males’ risk-taking and delinquent behaviour, while at the same time, keeping girls’ criminal involvement in check via tighter social restrictions and controls
Girls and Gangs
Anne Campbell, New York City
Most linked to male gangs
Not your typical working class girls
Short-term solutions to problems
Want to end up different than their
mothers
Many also subject to victimization: IPV
Sexism too: girls are often not wanted or
valued in delinquent groups
No affirmative action or pay equity laws
in place in the ‘underworld’
E.G. Biker gangs (Wolf) and other
organized crime
NEED FOR GENDER SPECIFIC THEORY?
Victimization (including IPV)
Economic Marginality
Reproductive Differences