Exam 1 Flashcards
Tenacity
acceptance of a belief based on the idea that “we have always known it to be this way”
ex: popular sayings-opposites attract, can’t teach dogs new tricks
Authority
acceptance of a belief because an authority figure tells us it is so
Reason
acceptance of a belief because it conforms to the rules of logic
Intuition
acceptance of a belief based on our feeling that it is true
Common sense
acceptance of a belief based on our sense that there’s a shared understanding
Personal experience
acceptance of a belief based on our own experiences
Science
acceptance of a belief based on the results of observation and experimentation
Theoretical definition
the meaning of a variable in words
Operational definition
the meaning of a variable in terms of the method(s) used to manipulate or measure it
Social comparison theory
we compare ourselves to other people to determine our own worth
Upward social comparison
comparing with someone better than us
often makes us feel worse about ourselves
Downward social comparison
comparing with someone worse than us
often makes us feel better about ourselves
Five Criteria of a Good Theory
1) Predictive accuracy
2) Internal coherence
3) Parsimony/Economy
4) Fertility
5) Verifiability
Internal coherence
theory has ideas that logically flow from one another
Parsimony/Economy
a theory is no more complicated than it needs to be
Fertility
a theory suggests new ideas for further study
Verifiability
theory is testable through empirical methods (based on observation)
Positive linear relationship
both variables increase/decrease
variables move together in same direction
Negative linear relationship
one variable increases while the other decreases
Curvilinear relationship
increase in one variable is accompanied by increases and decreases in other variable
No relationship
straight line
What correlations tell us
- variables change together
- predictability (can predict probable value of one variable by knowing value of other variable)
Predictor variable
- X
- variable used to predict
Criterion variable
- Y
- variable whose value is being predicted
Third variable problem
relationship may be driven by action of unmeasured “3rd variable”
why correlation doesn’t equal causation
Directionality problem
what caused what?
Ex: aggression and violent video game playing
Nonexperimental research
- research that observes variables that occur naturally
- most common type=correlational research
Pro: can look at relationships of interest that cannot be investigated otherwise
Con: Can’t infer causation
Experimental research
-manipulation of an IV
-control over extraneous variables
(cannot call it an experiment without random assignment)
Pro: ability to identify/describe causal relationship
Cons: can’t be used if you can’t manipulate variable of interest, tight control over extraneous variables limits generalizability