Exam 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Communication

A

The collaborative construction and negotiation of meaning between the self and others as it occurs within cultural context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

History of Communication

A

An attempt to capture what happened in the world of communication that brought us to the present moment, acknowledging that all histories are subjective, limited. and shared by power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Greek Culture

A

Primarily and oral culture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Classical Approach

A

Greeks and Romans

Prescriptive- people should persuade and be persuaded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the role of civilization in the greeks?

A

They had to argue for themselves in a court of law, meaning they had to learn how to be effective speakers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sophists

A

Known to be the first public speaking teachers. “Teachers of Wisdom”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why were Sophists Controversial?

A

Leading Philosopher Plato thought what the sophists were advocating was manipulative and irresponsible. Meaning that using language to persuade was really a means of masking or altering the truth of a situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Rhetoric

A

Defined by Aristotle as ‘Uncovering, in any given case, the available means of persuasion”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Pathos, Ethos, and Logos

A

Techniques someone would be using to persuade us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Pathos

A

Passions of the audience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ethos

A

Character of the speaker in the speech as spoken

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Logos

A

Word, Reason, Argument, Speech, Language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Social Science of Communication

A

Early to mid 20th century
Studied Communication as an object
Science seeks to explain, predict, and control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Interpersonal Communication

A

An exchange or interaction that occurs between people who are in an interdependent relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Organizational Communication

A

Communication as constitutive of the stories, values, expectations, norms, languages, and roles of an organization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Non-Verbal Communication

A

All models of communication except language, including nonword vocals, gestures, use of space, time, artifacts, and smell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Instructional Communication

A

Communication in the: workplace, family, conflict, and computer-mediated communication in each emerged from a scientific approach of the study of interaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What persuades people?

A

Source Credibility

Fear Appeals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Edward Bernays

A

Father of Public Relations

20
Q

Carl Hovland

A

1950; Yale University. Persuasion and attitude Change

21
Q

Shannon and Weaver

A

1963; The Mathematical Theory of Communication

Source-Message-Reciever

22
Q

Harold Lasswell

A

Hypodermic Events

Who (says) What (to) Whom (With) What effect (in) What channel

23
Q

Drawback of Social Scientific Approach?

A

Communication isn’t always an object

24
Q

Social Constructionism

A

Communication is viewed as a process; a messy enterprise we all engage in, searching for meaning in ourselves and in one another as we make our way trough the world

25
Q

Berger and Luckmann

A

1967; The Social Construction of Reality
Explored communication as a fluid, sometimes contradictory and complex process situated in social contexts, settings, or communities

26
Q

Objective Reality

A

The world we live in

27
Q

Subjective Reality

A

How we live in the world; Socialization, Conversation, Identity

28
Q

Critical/ Cultural Approach

A

Communication that reflects on and addresses power structures
Who can speak?
What you talk about?
When do you talk?

29
Q

1st Acxiom

A

You cannot not communicate

30
Q

2nd Acxiom

A

Any message contains a content and relational dimension

31
Q

Institutionalization

A

Habits and Customs that become standard over time

32
Q

Hegemony

A

Gromsci; Domination by Consent

33
Q

Paolo Freire

A

Pedagogy of the oppressed. Advocates a more democratic approach to instruction

34
Q

Praxis

A

Reflection on the world and how to change it

35
Q

Notion of Reflexivity

A

Think about how people will react

36
Q

“Banking Method”

A

Knowledge that is deposited into your mind

37
Q

Reflexivity

A

To consider your reflexes

38
Q

Reasoning

A

Important to maintaining your audiences trust and your own credibility as a speaker

39
Q

Inductive Reasoning

A

Synthetic Process that moves from particular observations to probable conclusions

40
Q

Deductive Reasoning

A

When someone makes a larger claim that must be supported through a series of hypothesis

41
Q

Toulmin Model

A

1958; Helps isolate the three parts of an effective model

  1. Claim
  2. Data (grounds for claim)
  3. Warrant (link that justifies the claim
42
Q

Public Advocacy

A

Careful, thoughtful, responsible communication

43
Q

Counterarguement

A

The reasons a listener or reader may have for disagreeing with a given message

44
Q

Logical Fallacies

A

Errors in Reasoning

45
Q

Slippery Slope Reasoning

A

Common fallacy which suggests that if one event happens, then a whole serious of other increasingly terrible events will happen as well

46
Q

Ad Hominem Attacks

A

attack to the person rather than the argument

47
Q

Red Herring

A

When a speaker or writer distracts an audience from a flaw or a misstep in argumentation by making an observation that is unrelated or irrelevant