Exam 1 Flashcards
If you are a private employee, (someone who works for private entity, small business) your relationship per all cases is called
AT WILL
You can quit at anytime for any reason/no reason or be fired at any time for any reason/no reason,
JUST NOT THE WRONG REASON (race, gender, etc)
Basic relationship of PRIVATE employees in California is
AT WILL (different from public employees)
At will is
At whim!
Public employment can’t…
take any disciplinary action without just cause, due process.
Due process hearing in CA was provided by the case
SKELLY! Entitled to a skelly hearing
Must have opportunity to present witnesses and testimony
Due process is a
fair hearing and the opportunity to be heard and present evidence
Some exceptions to “At Will” doctrine:
1) Expressed Contract: Written and oral. contract. Always be ENFORCED. Oral contract for more than a year has to be in writing. (Skelly v. state personnel board) We know everything about contract! Terms are expressly stated.
2) Implied Contract: Foley v. Interactive Data
Those that we imply from the surrounding circumstances. Example: because you’ve been with me 10 years, you’ve had history of promotions. Because you’ve never been subject to discipline or corrective action. Gives rise to the relationship being outside “at will”
3) Implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Every contract in CA, there is implied covenant that the parties will deal fairly with each other. Similar to implied contract.
4) Public policy: Roho v. Kleiger. Rojo wanted to sue for sexual harassment and discrimination. Blew statute of limitation on fehaw claim (1 year) Was still within 2 years of public policy claim
Supreme Court stated that the statues of state of CA are public policy.
Foley case told us that
You can have implied contracts as well as expressed contracts
Foley factors:
Length of employment, longer you’ve been an employee, the greater your reasonable expectation of permits?
Employer’s policies, procedures and practices.
Implied contract words:
statements of HOPE!
2 ways of showing discrimination
Disparate treatment
Disparate impact
Disparate treatment is determined by…
McDonnell Douglas test~ shifting burdens test?
McDonnell Douglas v. Green
judge said to be able to prove disparate treatment case, plaintiff must show 4 things to create a prima fascia showing
4 Things must be shown to create a prima fascia showing for disparate treatment
1) Membership in a protected class
2) Performing adequately/qualified to be hired
3) Adverse job action. Fired, weren’t hired, were demoted, weren’t promoted.
4) Endice for discrimination. Some reason to believe that #3 was because of #1
Once plaintiff shows prima fascia case, burden shifts to…
defendant
the defendant has to show there was a some bonafide business purpose. (example: let him go-sales were down)
If defendant can show bonafide business purpose then burden shifts to…
plaintiff to show that it’s PRETEXT, that it’s NOT TRUE! (get’s let go from “layoff”..job listing up a week after for same position).
2nd method of proving discrimination is
Disparate Impact: can be intentional, can be unintentional
When some protected class is disparately affected by some criterion used in the employment process.
What test do we use to show disparate impact?
The 4/5th’s test
Looking at protected class to see if its succeeding at 80% of the general population’s success rate, if not then there’s presumption of disparate impact.
Rebuttable presumption!
2 cases on disparate impact
Griggs v. Duke power
UAW v. Johnson control
Griggs v. Duke power
Impact case: Griggs v. Duke power (Duke power discriminated against blacks, in 6 of 7 job categories, only allowing them to be in the lowest). (Intentional-tried to find a new way to discriminate against blacks)
Then must be high school graduate
Blacks weren’t graduating at 80% of general population rate
Bonafide occupational qualification
Discuss UAW v. Johnson Control
UAW v. Johnson control (unintentional) (concerned about women’s health)
Johnson control found out that lead exposure can be harmful to pregnant moms and fetuses so in order to protect them, we’re going to say you can’t work in position where there is direct exposure when you’re in childbearing age. (Fertile females)
Supreme court said good goal but can be achieved some other way. Not every woman of child bearing age wants to/plans to get pregnant when working there.
Not a reasonable BFOQ to limit all women of childbearing age.
Title 7, civil rights act of 1964, civil rights act
All equally valid, synonymous
Federal statute.
Feha predates
title 7
Administrative required prior to
filing suit.
What is the EEOC
Equal employment opportunity commission.
FEDERAL agency that administers Title 7!
What is DFEH
Department of fair employment and housing.
An agency of California STATE government charged with the
protection of residents from employment,
housing and public accommodation discrimination, and hate violence
What is FEHA
Fair employment and housing act.
Primary law that provides employees with protection from discrimination, retaliation and harassment in employment. All employment provisions of the FEHA anti-discrimination provisions apply to all employers with five or more full-time or part-time employees.
Had FEHA before a
Title 7!
Jerry Brown’s dad champion of civil rights, helped pass legislation