153: FINAL Flashcards
One protected class you can’t have is:
Race
Original primary purpose of TITLE 7
To end race discrimination
Protected class that gives greatest amount of difficulty is:
Religion because:
protected by first amendment
2 protected classes that have the greatest number of requirements for reasonable accommodation are:
Religion and disability
Disability was not
one of the original protected classes
Disability was amended into
FEHA
both part of FEDERAL (ADA) and STATE statues (FEHA)
To reasonably accommodate does not mean you have to (if it can be done) (Disability)
Don’t have to create a job
Do not have to hire someone to a position that does not exist
Maintain someone who can’t perform the vital work duties of the position
Must reasonably accommodate if possible.
Must reasonably accommodate religion…does not mean
Does not mean you have to sway away from a seniority system (TWA case-airline-7 day adventist didn’t want to work Saturday-court agreed with TWA and not going to change the way they’ve been doing business/do do business in order to accommodate)
has to fit within both essential job functions and it has to fit within a seniority system or other type of preference given on the job.
One of the great areas of litigation in National origin:
English Only
Spun State gave us rule that
You can have english only rules especially those who have direct contact with the public
Those people who don’t have contact with the public but are BILINGUAL.
Certain limitations
Can’t have english only rules for those
who are not able to speak english because you are depriving them the ability to communicate around the job.
EEOC issued guideline that there was a
presumption of national origin discrimination by the existence of the “english only rule”
Court said no. You can have it
The question was if they’re able to communicate or not
EEOC issued guideline that there was a
presumption of national origin discrimination by the existence of the “english only rule”
Court said no. You can have it
The question was if they’re able to communicate or not
National Labor Relations act
Act that gave tremendous amount of RIGHTS and POWER to union
Gave us unfair labor practices as applied to management
Allowed for strikes, rehire (for those striking so long as it was based on unfair labor practice)
Said there was a duty to negotiate in good faith (don’t have to reach final agreement but have the duty to negotiate in good faith)
Taft Hartley Act told us
That Unions can also have unfair labor practices, that Unions could also be in violation of the law.
Did not change right to strike
Exception to right to strike:
Wildcat Strike: strike called by a group of workers without anyone’s (union/manager’s) proof. Not protected by NLRA
Not part of formal bargaining process set out by NLRA
Under NLRA, bargaining (2):
Permissive and mandatory bargaining matters
Mandatory: everything that has to do with conditions of employment-wages, hours, benefits (HAVE TO TALK ABOUT, don’t have to reach agreement)
Permissive: can negotiate about either topics the union or manager feels strongly about, but you don’t have to (health club memberships, uniform allowances, etc)
Workers’ Compensation was no fault system:
Set out so someone is compensated for injury on the job and don’t have to prove employer was negligent
Award, judgement is smaller than it would have been if they had proven negligence. Whole point of Toland and Privette.
Employment bargain. Third party tort fees can be liable for more than employer
Two exceptions to the limitations of the capitacians to the no fault nature of workers’ compensation
-Labor code 132A
132A is the section that says you can’t retaliate against someone for bringing a workers’ compensation claim. You will be subject to civil and criminal penalties
-Serious and willful violation: when employer knew or should have known that they were putting the worker into a dangerous position in the work that they were performing without putting in adequate safeguards. (car brakes example)
McDonnell Douglas test:
Test that supreme court gave us to show DISPARATE TREATMENT
McDonnell Douglast test, court said:
The way that we’re going to prove discrimination is the prima fascia showing:
Membership in a protected class
Qualified to be hired or performing adequately
Adverse job action (fired)
Endice (indication, evidence) of discrimination
Once plaintiff has shown prima fascia showing…
the defendant can show that there was a GOOD FAITH reason for their action (layoff, closing office)..
burden then shifts to the plaintiff and the plaintiff has to show PRETEXT (NOT TRUE)
Yeah you closed the office but you just put out a job offering for the job that person had!
Age discrimination has its own federal statute:
separate, apart from title 7 but tracks with title 7, (McDonnell Test)
FEDERAL: ADEA: AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT ACT
Prima fascia showing applies to:
all protected classes including disability discrimation-federal (ADA), state (FEHA)
and also deals with age discrimination
ADEA (federal)
Protected class is ANYONE OVER 40.
Age discrimination is unique
protects people dependent on their age, even in the protected class
Age is…
relative and must be taken into consideration. Someone who is 45 is more like someone who is 39 than someone who is 60
Age was amended into
FEHA (state) and part of fair employment and housing act despite it has its separate statute on federal level.
Arbitration is …
cheaper and faster than binding!
There is no extent in law than civil litigation
Faster because typical arbitration goes to hearing 6 months after,
typical trial 18-24 months …FINAL
Can’t appeal arbitration unless you can show some kind of fraud
Judgement you can always
appeal
obligation on district court of appeal to hear your appeal
any case you can appeal
ERISA (employment retirement income security act)
cast by congress in answer to wrongdoing within pension plans that had been done by both business and labor unions companies. Companies used those pension funds for improper purposes so congress passed ERISA
ERISA originally passed to
regulate pension plans
ERISA includes all
employee benefit plans (health, dental, disability-all of these health plans under ERISA, not workers’ comp)
Important things to remember about ERISA:
1) It preempts any state statute (there can’t be a state statute that deals with pension funds, healthcare plans, EXCLUSIVE FEDERAL JURISDICTION
Because congress said that pension plans being mishandled and misused are NATIONAL PLANS. Don’t want separate law in CA than other states. Want one law across country that applies to all pension funds/plans
No matter where you are employed, you have that same protection!
If you want to sue someone regarding ERISA, you have to go to FEDERAL COURT
Fair labor standard act passed to end
child labor but then expanded to include a lot more than child labor (minimum wage)
Sets MINIMUM as far as wage an hour law in the country
FEDERAL STATUTE
Not preemptive. federal minimum wage: $7.25, CA: $10
Allows states and localities to have higher standards
Nonexempt employees (wage an hour law)
administrative, supervisorial, professional.
not entitled to overtime, lunch and rest breaks. Theory being they run their own schedule due to the position that they old.