EWT: Cognitive interview Flashcards
What is the cognitive interview?
Method of interviewing eyewitnesses to help them retrieve more accurate memories
Who developed the cognitive interview?
Fisher and Geiselman
What are the 4 techniques of the cognitive interview?
1- report everything
2- reinstate the context
3- reverse the order
4- change perspective
What is ‘report everything’?
Witnesses are encouraged to report every single detail of the event, even if it seems irrelevant
What is ‘reinstate the context’?
Witnesses should return to the crime scene in their mind and imagine the environment and their emotions (context-dependent forgetting)
What is ‘reverse the order’?
Events should be recalled in a new order, often backwards. This prevents people reporting expectations rather than actual events
What is ‘change perspective’?
Witnesses should recall the incident from other people’s perspectives. This disrupts the effect of expectations and schema on recall
What is the enhanced cognitive interview (ECI)?
Fisher et al developed additional elements of the CI to focus on social dynamics of the interaction
What are the strengths of the cognitive interview?
- Support for effectiveness of the CI
- Variations of the CI
What are the limitations of the cognitive interview?
- Inaccurate information
- Some elements may be more useful
- CI is time consuming
STRENGTH- Support for the effectiveness of the CI
I= there is evidence the CI works
D= meta-analysis by Kohnken et al combined data from 55 studies comparing Ci with the standard police interview. CI gave an average 41% increase in accurate information vs standard interview
E= shows the CI is an effective technique in helping witnesses recall information that is stored in memory, but is not immediately accessible
STRENGTH- Variations of the CI
I= CI has been used in a wide variety of ways by the police
D= police take a ‘pick n mix’ approach, allowing them to evolve their own approaches and permits them to adapt the method to individual cases
E= the CI is therefore flexible, and gains credibility in the eyes of police officers
LIMITATION- Inaccurate information
I= the CI increases the amount of inaccurate information provided by participants
D= Kohnken et al’s study found an increase in inaccurate information. Particularly an issue in ECI. Cognitive interviews may sacrifice quality of EWT
E= means police officers should treat eyewitness evidence with caution
LIMITATION- Some elements may be more useful
I= not all elements of the CI are equally effective or useful
D= Milne and Bull found that each of the 4 techniques used alone produce more information than the standard police interview. But combining 1 and 2 produced better recall than any other combination
E= this casts doubt on the overall credibility of the CI
LIMITATION- The CI is time-consuming
I= the CI takes more time and training than the standard police interview
D= more time needed to establish rapport and allow people to relax. Also requires special training, which many forces do not have the resources to provide
E= suggests the CI is not a realistic method for police officers to use, and it may be better to focus on a few key elements