Evolution of classification system Flashcards
Early classification systems only used…
Observable features to place organisms into groups
e.g whether they lay eggs, can fly
What is the problem of using the observable features to categorise organisms into groups?
Scientists don’t always agree on the RELATIVE IMPORTANCE of different features and groups based SOLELY on PHYSICAL FEATURES may not show how RELATED organisms are.
Give an example of an aquatic organism that ‘looks’ similar but scientifically arent.
Sharks and whales, look quite similar and they both live in the SEA. But they’re NOT actually CLOSELY RELATED. Whales and MAMMALS and sharks are CARTILAGINOUS FISH- two completely different classes.
Classification systems are NOW based on…
Observable features along with OTHER EVIDENCE.
The MORE SIMILAR organisms are, the MORE RELATED they are. We now use a wide range of evidence to see HOW SIMILAR, and therefore how related, organisms are.
For example, Molecular evidence, explain?
Molecular evidence - the similarities in PROTEINS and DNA.
MORE CLOSELY RELATED organisms will have MORE SIMILAR molecules.
> You can COMPARE things like how DNA is stored and the SEQUENCE of DNA bases.
E.G the BASE SEQUENCE for human and chimpanzee DNA is about 94% the SAME.
> You can also compare the SEQUENCE of AMINO ACIDS in proteins from different organisms.
E.G. CYTOCHROME C is a short protein found in many species. The more SIMILAR the AMINO ACID SEQUENCE of cytochrome C in two different species, the MORE CLOSELY RELATED the species are likely to be.
The MORE SIMILAR organisms are, the MORE RELATED they are. We now use a wide range of evidence to see HOW SIMILAR, and therefore how related, organisms are.
For example, Embrylogical evidence, explain?
Embryological evidence -The similarities in the EARLY STAGES of an organism’s DEVELOPMENT.
The MORE SIMILAR organisms are, the MORE RELATED they are. We now use a wide range of evidence to see HOW SIMILAR, and therefore how related, organisms are.
For example, Anatomical evidence, explain?
Anatomical evidence - the similarities in STRUCTURE and FUNCTION of different body parts.
The MORE SIMILAR organisms are, the MORE RELATED they are. We now use a wide range of evidence to see HOW SIMILAR, and therefore how related, organisms are.
For example, Behavioral evidence, explain?
Behavioral evidence -The similarities in BEHAVIOUR and SOCIAL ORGANISATION of organisms.
How can new technologies aid in classification?
New technologies (e.g, new DNA techniques, better microscopes) can result in NEW DISCOVERIES being made and the RELATIONSHIPS between organisms being CLARIFIED.
How is communication of new findings valuable for classification.
Scientists can share their new discoveries in MEETINGS and SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS.
How organisms are CLASSIFIED is CONTINUALLY REVISED to take account of any NEW FINDINGS that scientists DISCOVER.
Skunks were classified in the family MUSTELIDAE until MOLECULAR EVIDENCE revealed their DNA SEQUENCE ws significantly different to other members of that family. So thy were reclassified into the family MEPHITIDAE.
The five kingdom classification system has now been replaced with the …
three domain system.
In the older SYSTEMS the LARGEST GROUPS were the …
FIVE KINGDOMS - all organisms were placed into ONE of these groups: >Protocista >Fungi >Animilia >Plantae >Prokaryotae
In 1990, the…
three domain system was proposed. The new system has three domains - LARGE SUPERKINGDOMS that are ABOVE the kingdoms in the TAXONOMIC HIERARCHY.
In the three domain system, organisms that were in the kingdom ….
Prokaryotae (which contains unicellular organisms WITHOUT A NUCLEUS) are seperated into two domains - Archaea and Bacteria.
Organisms with cells that CONTAIN A NUCLEUS are placed in the DOMAIN …
EUKARYA