Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Flash Cards > Evidence [the essentials] > Flashcards

Evidence [the essentials] Flashcards

1
Q

Relevant Evidence

A

Evidence has to be logically + legally relevant

Logical: tends to prove or disprove a fact of consequence

Legal: Probative value not outweighed by all the 403 factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Rule 403

A

Judge has discretion to exclude evidence if probative value is substantially outweighed by:
-unfair prejudice
-confusion of issues
-misleading jury
-waste of time
-undue delay
-cumulative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Unfair Prejudice [Rule 403]

A

Evidence that has the potential to move jury to decide case on improper basis. (1) evidence could move the jury to decide with emotion (2) evidence admissible on one basis but not the other–leading to the danger that the jury may still use the evidence for the improper purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Habit Evidence

A

Evidence of a regular response to a specific set of circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Character Evidence

A

Describes someones general disposition or propensity. Usually conveys a moral judgement. Generally inadmissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Public Policy Exception

A

When evidence, even if admissible, is excluded for public policy reasons because doing so encourages conduct we want

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Liability Insurance

A

Not admissible to prove negligence or wrongful conduct. Admissible to prove: (1) ownership/control (2) impeach a witness [bias] (3) as part of an admission of liability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Subsequent Remedial Measures

A

Inadmissible to prove negligence, culpable conduct, defect or need for warning/instructions.

Admissible to prove: (1) ownership/control (2) rebut a claim that a precaution was not feasible (3) to prove that the opposing party had destroyed evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Civil Settlements + Negotiations

A

evidence of settlement or an offer to settle is not admissible to (1) prove/disprove the validity or amount of disputed claim (2) impeach a witness by prior inconsistent statement/contradiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Plea Discussions

A

Inadmissible: offers to plead guilty, withdrawn guilty plea, actual no contendere pleas, statements of fact made during plea discussions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Payments of + Offers to Pay Medical Expenses

A

Inadmissible to prove liability

Admissions of fact that come with payments or offers are admissible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Character Evidence in Civil Cases

A

Evidence generally not admissible to prove conduct in conformity.

Limited Exception: sexual assault/molestation cases

Admissible when character is directly at issue. Ex: (1) defamation cases where truth is a defense (2) negligent hiring or entrustment issue (3) child custody cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Character Evidence in Criminal Cases

A

Evidence of a person’s character is generally INADMISSIBLE to prove they acted in conformity with that character on a given occasion.

Prosecutor: cannot offer character evidence first (unless rape/molestation)

Defendant: can offer evidence of good character. Must be a pertinent trait. Can do this by reputation or opinion evidence. No specific acts

Prosecutor: can rebut Ds character evidence: (1) offer evidence of Ds bad character by calling own character witness to provide reputation/opinion testimony about the Ds bad character trait. (2) Cross Examine Ds character witness–may ask witness about specific acts of D that show the Ds bad character for trait in Q [have you heard?]–this is for impeachment and NOT to prove conduct

Victims Character: D also has key to victim character door. Can bring reputation/opinion evidence about bad character trait of V. Then P can with reputation/opinion evidence (1) victims good character same trait (2) Ds bad character same trait

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rebutting Self-Defense [Homicide]

A

Prosecution can initiate. Any evidence admitted that victim was first aggressor opens the door to evidence of victim’s good character for peacefulness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rape Victims + Character Evidence

A

GENERALLY: past is not admissible. In both civil/criminal–evidence offered to prove sexual behavior/disposition of victim generally not allowed

Exceptions:

Criminal: (1) instances with third persons to prove source of injury/physical evidence [semen usually] (2) instances with D to prove consent

Civil: (1) If probative value substantially outweighs harm (2) victim places own reputation in controversy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Prior Bad Acts

A

Evidence of a persons crimes, wrongs or bad acts can be admissible if relevant to some other issue rather than character or propensity to commit crime charged [or act done in civil]

Non-Character Purpose: MIMIC–motive, intent, mistake [absence of], identity, common scheme or plan

Can be proven using ANY evidence that is otherwise admissible [witness, criminal convictions etc].

Standard of Proof that this act exists: reasonable jury could come to this conclusion [low bar]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Similar Misconduct + Sex Crimes

A

Ds other similar acts are admissible in any criminal or civil case involving alleged sexual assault or molestation

CRIM: adds DV case + elder abuse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Competency of Witnesses

A

Generally: everyone is considered competent as long as the witness has personal knowledge and takes an oath

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Modern Modifications [re lacking competency]

A

(1) Children: case-by-case determination (2) insanity-still competent if witness understands obligation to speak truthfully (3) judge + jury at the trial: may NOT testify

Jury [at trial]: after trial if there is an inquiry into the validity of the verdict, the jurors can ONLY testify about deliberations: (1) extraneous prejudicial information (2) outside influence (3) mistake on verdict form (4) another jurors clear statement that they relied on racial stereotypes/animus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Leading Questions

A

Generally only permitted on cross.

Judge MAY allow on direct: (1) preliminary/intro matters (2) witness needs help responding (3) witness is hostile, adverse party or affiliated with adverse party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Cross Examination

A

Typically limited to Qs within the scope of direct examination. May also ask about matters relating to credibility of witness [impeachment]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Using documents during testimony [generally]

A

General Rule is that a witness cannot read testimony from a prepared document. Docs are OOC statements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Refreshing Recollection

A

Witness may use ANY writing/object to refresh recollection

Safeguards against abuse: (1) have writing produced (2) cross-examine witness with it (3) introduce portions of writing related to testimony into evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Past Recollection Recorded

A

Hearsay Exception. Used when witness cannot remember even with recollection refreshed.

Elements: (1) witness has insufficient recollection (2) witness has personal knowledge (3) record made by witness, made under witness’s direction, or adopted by witness (4) record made when matters were fresh in the witness’s mind (4) witness says that the record accurately reflects their knowledge

IMPORTANT: record read into evidence only. NOT admitted as exhibit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Lay Witness Opinion Testimony

A

Admissible if: (1) rationally based on witness’s perception (2) helpful (3) not based on specialized knowledge

LEGAL CONCLUSIONS not admissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Expert Witness Testimony Requirements

A

(1) Expert is qualified–must possess special knowledge, skill, experience or education (2) expert is reasonably certain–guess or speculation not permitted (3) helpful (4) based on sufficient facts/data–(a) facts based on personal observation (b) facts made known to expert at trial (c)facts of the type that could be reasonably relied on by other experts in the field in admissible doc (ex: pathology report) (5) based on reliable principles/methods (6) reliably applied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Daubert Factors

A

How court determines reliability: (1) Testing (2) peer review and publication (3) error rate decent (4) standards controlling (5) general acceptance by other experts in the field

Not all factors must be satisfied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Learned Treatise Hearsay Exception

A

May be used during expert testimony to (1) impeach experts (2) as substantive evidence–what the treatise says is true

Must show:established as reliable evidence by testimony of expert, testimony of another expert, or judicial notice

Excerpt is read into evidence but NOT an exhibit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Expert Opinion: Ultimate Issue

A

Generally permitted except for testimony concerning Ds mental state in criminal case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Impeachment

A

Attacking the credibility of a witness. Any party can impeach.

Types:
-prior inconsistent statements
-bias or interest
-criminal convictions
-bad acts
-opinion or reputation regarding untruthfulness
-sensory deficiencies

31
Q

Prior Inconsistent Statement [Impeachment]

A

(1) may be done on examination of witness or with extrinsic evidence

(2) extrinsic evidence must be relevant and foundation is required

These statements are offered just to impeach (non-hearsay)

Admissible as substantive evidence when made under oath at prior proceeding (then NOT hearsay)(Ex: deposition)

Admissibility of Extrinsic Evidence: may be introduced only if (1) not collateral (2) at some point during case the witness must have the opportunity to explain or deny and must give the adverse party the opportunity to examine the witness (before or after admission)

Exception to foundation requirement: (1) if prior inconsistent statement is opposing party (2) where hearsay declarant is being impeached (3) where justice so requires

32
Q

Bias [Impeachment]

A

Extrinsic evidence allowed, but witness generally must be questioned re bias first (foundation)

33
Q

Sensory Deficiencies [Impeachment]

A

Evidence that shows that faculties or perception or recollection were so impaired to make it doubtful witness could have perceived.

(1) admissible on examination of witness or by extrinsic

(2) no foundation required

34
Q

Contradiction [Impeachment]

A

Showing that some facts that witness testified to are not the case–and that they are therefore lying or mistaken about said facts

(1) Extrinsic evidence generally admitted unless impeaching would go to collateral matter

(2) has to have value BEYOND the contradiction

35
Q

Opinion or Reputation evidence of untruthfulness

A

A witness can be impeached with testimony that shows that the witness has poor character

(1) Extrinsic evidence permitted. No limit

36
Q

Conviction of a Crime [Federal]

A

Witness can be impeached by proof of conviction. No limit on extrinsic evidence.

Crimes that can be used:

(1) any crime involving dishonesty or false statement [felony OR misdemeanor]. Court has no discretion re 403 here. Admissible unless very old.

(2) Felonies [generally] not involving dishonesty. Court has discretion to exclude. Balancing depends (1) if witness is D in criminal case then the court will exclude if prosecution has not shown probative value outweighs prejudicial

(b) everyone else the court will exclude if objecting party shows Rule 403

Remoteness of Conviction: if more than 10 years or release of confinement (whichever later), then the court MAY allow if probative value substantially outweighs prejudicial effect

37
Q

Bad Acts involving untruthfulness [Impeachment]

A

Interrogation permitted (can cross examine witness about acts of lying, deceit, etc)

NO extrinsic evidence

38
Q

Impeaching a hearsay declarant

A

Credibility of declarant can be attacked. Difference: declarant does not need to be given the opportunity to explain or deny prior inconsistent statements.

39
Q

Rehabilitation [Post-Impeachment] [Federal]

A

If witness is impeached, then rehab evidence may come in

(1) explanation on redirect (2) if character attacked by rep/opinion testimony (not truthful), then evidence of good character for truthfulness can come in (3) prior consistent statements (4) if bias, then a consistent statement before motive to lie arose can come in (5) if testimony impeached on some other ground, then prior inconsistent statement made at a. time when it would be likely to rehabilitate.

If admissible for rehabilitation, then it is NOT HEARSAY. And can also COME IN FOR THE TRUTH

40
Q

Federal Court [Diversity Case]

A

Apply state evidence with privileges, witness competency + effect of presumptions

41
Q

Bolstering Credibility

A

FRE: cannot bolster testimony of witness until there has been impeachment

42
Q

Hearsay

A

OOC statement offered to prove the the truth of the matter asserted

Overall rule: evidence is inadmissible if it is hearsay unless it falls under an exception (or an exclusion–not hearsay)

43
Q

Specific Situations of Non-hearsay

A

(1) verbal acts/legally operative language that creates a contract etc

(2) statements offered to show their effect on the listener

44
Q

Certain Prior Statements by Witnesses

A

Hearsay exclusion

(1) when prior statement is a statement of identification of a person after perceiving them

45
Q

Admission by Party Opponent

A

Hearsay Exclusion

Statements by or attributable to an opposing party

(1) admission by another person that can be attributed to the party

(2) party’s silence in fact of accusation admissible if (a) party heard and understood + (b) party capable of denying + (c) reasonable person would have

(3) vicarious statements by opposing party via:
-spokesperson
-employee/agent if within scope of employment
-partners
-co-conspirators

46
Q

Hearsay Exceptions–Declarant Unavailable

A

Establishing Unavailability: (1) death or illness (2) privilege (3) refusal to testify despite court order (4) inability to remember subject matter (5) absent + attendance cannot be procured

47
Q

Former Testimony

A

Hearsay Exception

(1) Declarant unavailable (2) Testimony under oath (3) party against whom testimony being offered [civil cases–predecessor in interest] had opportunity/similar motive to develop

48
Q

Statements Against Interest

A

Hearsay Exception

(1) Declarant Unavailable. (1) Statements against pecuniary, proprietary, penal interest - such that a reasonable person would not have made the statement unless they believed it to be true

CRIM: penal interest has to be corroborated

49
Q

Dying Declaration

A

Hearsay Exception

Statements under belief of impending death in homicide prosecutions/any civil case: (1) unavailable declarant (2) homicide prosecution or any civil civil (3) declarant believed that their death was imminent (4) statement concerned cause/circumstances

Death NOT actually required

50
Q

Statements of Personal/Family History

A

Hearsay Exception

Concerning stuff like births, deaths, marriage etc

51
Q

Statement against party who procured declarant’s unavailability

A

Statement admissible against a person who’s wrongful conduct cause declarant to be unavailable

52
Q

Excited Utterance

A

Hearsay Exception

OOC statement (1) relates to startling event/condition (2) made while speaker was under stress of excitement of event/condition

Key: emotional state

53
Q

Present Sense Impression

A

Hearsay Exception

OOC statement (1) describes/explains event or condition (2) made while or immediately after declarant perceives an act or condition

Key: Timing

54
Q

Present State of Mind or Physical Condition

A

Statements of then existing state of mind or physical condition of declarant–does NOT include statements of memory or belief

This includes statements of intent - declarant’s intent to do something in the future

55
Q

Statements made for purpose of medical diagnose

A

Hearsay Exception

(1) statement that describes medical history, past or present symptoms or their inception or general cause (2) must be made for and reasonable pertinent to medical diagnosis or treatment

56
Q

Records of Regularly Conducted Activity–Business Records

A

Hearsay Exception

(1) record of act, event, condition, diagnosis (2) made in regular course of business and business regularly keeps such records (3) made near time of event (4) consists of matters within personal knowledge of entrant (or by someone who has duty to transmit info to entrant)

Foundation: in court testimony or certification

57
Q

Official Records + other official writings (Public Records)

A

Three Types: (1) activities of agency–internal HR type (2) records of matters observed pursuant to legal duty (a) but NOT including police observations in criminal cases (3) records of factual findings resulting from legally authorized investigation but not against D in criminal case

58
Q

Catchall Exception

A

Residual Exception

Elements: (1) guarantees of trustworthiness (2) strictly necessary (more probative on fact than any other available evidence) (3) must give notice

59
Q

Confrontation Clause

A

Only in criminal cases. 6th Amendment Issue

Not admissible if: (1) declarant unavailable (2) statement is testimonial (3) accused had no opportunity to cross declarant about statement

60
Q

Testimonial Statement

A

(1) Sworn testimony (prior trial/grand jury) (2) statements given to police to help build case against D

61
Q

Preliminary Questions of Fact

A

Facts that decide whether a piece of evidence is admissible

Decided by jury: jury decides facts as relating to relevance,

Decided by Judge: all other fact Qs related to admissibility

Standard: preponderance of the evidence–judge an consider ANY evidence [FRE rules do not apply except for privilege]

62
Q

Judicial Notice

A

Court recognizes fact as true without formal presentation of the evidence: (1) generally known within trial courts jurisdiction (2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources that cannot be reasonably questioned

CIVIL: conclusive [only mandatory if party has requested]
CRIM: “may”

63
Q

Rule of Completeness

A

When some or all of a writing or recorded statement is admitted: (1) adverse party may require proponent to introduce any other party OR (2) any related writing or recorded statement (3) that ought in fairness be considered at same time

64
Q

Limited Admissibility

A

Evidence may be admissible on limited basis

Judge must upon timely request issue limiting instructions

Judge may also exclude evidence entirely re Rule 403

65
Q

Attorney-Client Privilege

A

(1) confidential communications (2) between attorney + client [or their re[s] (3) during a professional legal consultation–must be made to obtain/render legal services

Held by: Client + attorney can generally claim for them

Lasts: after death

Corporate clients: employees authorized/director by corp to make such statements

Exceptions: generally crime/fraud + malpractice

66
Q

Psychotherapist/Social Worker-Patient Privilege

A

Operates the same as attorney-client

67
Q

Married Couples Privileges

A

Testimonial Privilege [Spousal Immunity]: only in CRIM

(1) Ds spouse cannot be compelled to testify against D (2) spouses must be married AT TIME OF TRIAL

Holder of Privilege: witness spouse [not the D]

Confidential Communications[applies in CIV/CRIM]: (1) must be confidential (2) Spouses must have been MARRIED AT THE TIME OF THE COMMUNICATION. Privilege remains if they get divorced

Holder of Privilege: either spouse can claim it–D can stop spouse from testifying.

68
Q

Clergy-Penitent Privilege

A

Protects statements made to members of clergy in their capacity as a spiritual advisor

69
Q

Privilege against self-incrimination

A

5th Amendment

Cannot be compelled to testify against themselves

70
Q

Ancient Documents Rule

A

Authenticated if you can show (1) at least 20 YO (2) in non-suspicious condition (3) found in place where likely to be

71
Q

Authenticating a Photo

A

(1) must be IDed by witness as fair + accurate depiction of the scene (2) generally do not need photographer

72
Q

X Rays/Cardiograms/Diagnostic Imaging

A

Have to show that the process used was accurate–machine in working order/person qualified

73
Q

Best Evidence Rule

A

To prove the content of a writing, recording or photo, you need the original [when evidence is being offered to prove the content of the evidence]

74
Q

Authenticating Real Evidence

A

(1) testimony of person who recognizes it (2) chain of of custody [for non-distinct looking real evidence]

Flash Cards (14 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions