Evidence (expert and witness) Flashcards
what evidence is there to prove:
BREACH
CAUSATION
LOSS
Breach - docs / expert (Bolam)
Causation - docs/WS
Loss - docs/EE/WS
is evidence admissible?
ALL evidence relating to the facts are ADMISSIBLE
SPECIAL RULES FOR:
- privileged evidence
- opinion evidence
- hearsay evidence
GOLDEN RULE - WHAT IS THE BEST KIND OF EVIDENCE
DIRECT ORAL TESTIMONY from witness capable of being cross-examined
(anything less is indirect evidence and inherently unreliable so weight attached to it varies)
DEFINE: privileged evidence
Evidence that is protected from inspection in civil proceedings by means of the rules of privilege
E.g. email from solicitor giving advise to client
INADMISSIBLE unless:
- privilege is waived
- privileged thing mentioned in WS (31.14)
DEFINE: OPINION EVIDENCE
Evidence of what a witness thinks, believes, or infers in regard to facts as distinguished from personal knowledge of the facts themselves
(anything that isn’t strictly fact)
INADMISSIBLE:
- it is the role of the court to form opinions
- court should not be unduly influenced by opinion of W who might not be as impartial as court
- court draws own inferences from facts
EXCEPTIONS TO OPINION EVIDENCE
PERCIEVED FACT (s.3(2) CEA 1972) - opinion shorthand for facts
EXPERT EVIDENCE (s.3(1) CEA 1972)
- ONE: must be expert (court decides this) - suitably experienced (and qualified)
- TWO: must give testimony/evidence that is reasonably needed to resolve an issue
DEFINE HEARSAY EVIDENCE (CEA 1995)
- ORAL OR WRITTEN STATEMENT
- made out of court
- adduced in court
- to prove truth in the matter stated
ADMISSIBLE BUT it is indirect evidence so inherently less reliable than direct oral documentary or real evidence
= procedural safeguards to ensure hearsay evidence is carefully scrutinised (weight reduced by s.4 factors)
RULES GOVERNING HEARSAY
S.1 CEA 1995 – admissible
S.2 – notice to the other side (deemed on exchange of WS unless one of the exceptions)
s.2 - request particulars
S.3 – apply to call for cross examination
S.4 – weight factors
S.5 – attack credibility (why aren’t they here)
court controls evidence before it by giving DIRECTIONS about…
- what issues requires evidence
- nature of evidence
- way evidence is to be placed before court
- limiting cross-examination
- what evidence to allow
purpose of witness statements
WS contains evidence person giving statement would be allowed to give orally at trial
WS stands as a witness’s evidence in chief
DRAFTING WS: if there is a reference to a document not disclosed/solicitor didn’t know about
- CALL CLIENT (to get doc)
- GO THROUGH DISCLOSURE TEST (is it disclosable?)
- IF DISCLOSABLE - MUST disclose (CPR 31.11) in a supplementary list by voluntary disclosure
- IF INSPECTABLE (i.e. not privileged)- remote it from WS or you waive privilege (31.14)
DRAFTING WS: HEARSAY evidence
admissible but if it is an important piece of evidence - try to get original witness to give WS (and oral testimony in court)
- ask court’s permission to bring in new witness
- amend costs budget
DRAFTING WS: FIRST PARA (SUMMARY JUDGEMENT)
“I refer to the application notice in this mater dated [X] and make this statement to answer to it and in opposition to [C/D’s] application for summary judgement”
DRAFTING WS: FINAL PARA (SUMMARY JUDGEMENT)
“In the circumstances, I respectfully request this honourable court to grant judgement in favour of the Claimant/Defendant”
Drafting WS: top right hand corner endorsement
[Claimant/Defendant] [Name] [First/Second/Third] (number of WS) [Initials1, Initials 2] (List of attached docs) [day signed]