Case and Costs Management Flashcards
CPR 1.4
court has duty to further the overriding objective by actively managing cases
- hands-on approach to deal with cases
Timeline (allocation and CCMC)
- defence
- notice of proposed allocation
… at least 28 days later
- Both parties file and serve (1) directions questionnaire D181, (2) proposed directions
- allocation and notice of allocation sent o both parties
- directions OR require CMC
Precedent H (deadlines and main details)
costs budget 3.13(1)b
filed with directions questionnaire if value of claim is less than £50,000
if value of claim between £50,000 and £10mn - filed not later than 21 days before CCMC
disclosure report (deadline and main detial)
Form N263 (CPR 31.5(3)-(8)
not less than 14 days before CCMC
Precedent R (deadline and main detail)
3.13(2)
no later than 7 days before CCMC
notice of proposed allocation (26.3)
tells parties what track provisionally allocated
- specify matters parties which parties must comply with by date specified in notice
- requires parties to file DQ and serve copies, proposed directions, costs budget, budget discussion report
Directions Questionnarire
enables court to determine whcih track case should be allocated to
- compliance with pre-action protocol
- settlemnet considered?
- extent of disclosure?
- witness/experts
- estimated time for trial
- which court
- which track
- stay?
parties attempt to agree directions if case has been provisionally allocated to FT
PRECEDENT H (costs budget)
a prescribed form for costs budget - it is an estimate of reasonable and proportionate costs which party intends to incur in proceedings
- contains statement of truth
filed with DQ if value less than £50,000 (3.13(1)a)
filed not later than 21 days before 1st CMC in any other case (3.13(1)b)
PRECEDENT R (budget discussion report)
parties discuss budgets with each other
- shows what figures agreed to for each phase of litigation
- brief summary for grounds of dispute (3D PD)
costs management (CPR)
- 1
3. 1(2)m - sweep up
cases exempt from costs management
3.12
more than £10mn
made on behalf of person under 18
sanctions for non compliance
3.4 - strike out
otherwise:
- case management
- money
IN TIME APPLICATION (deadline not passed)
3.1(2)a
court considers:
- reasons for requiring extension
- if delay in making application, why
- overriding objective
- hearing date affected?
not all or nothing - court can offer 7 e.g. if person applied for 14
RELIEF FROM SANCTIONS (out of time application)
3.9, Denton
- identify and assess the SERIOUSNESS and SIGNIFICANCE of the failure to comply with relevant rule/PD/court order
(if hearing date affected -it is serious)
- hearing dates affected?
- disrupt conduct of proceedings?
- if yes = serious and significant
- how late? if other party can still comply with rules = ok - Consider WHY the default occured
- debilitating illness = good
- forget/pressure at work = not good - Evaluate ALL CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE to ensure court deals with matter justly, with particular weight to CPR 3.9(a), (b)
- so consider pass failures, promptness of application, how well innocent party has complied in the past
pre action protocols + PD on pre-action conduct
sets out best practice + reasonable procedure to be followed
CPR requires parties to comply with these before issuing court proceedings
issue and serve CF
serve within 4m of issue (7.5(1))
summarises C’s case - issued by court at request of C