Evidence 41-64 Flashcards

1
Q

Hearsay Exceptions

When are Prior Statements Made Under Oathadmissible?

A

If they are offered against a party who was present in the previous trial;

The same issues are involved; AND

The party who it is offered against had the same motive and opportunity to examine the witness in the previous trial. (In CA: the party sharing similar interests is sufficient).

*ONLY applicable is the declarant is unavailable.

Priority: Medium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hearsay Exceptions

Under the FRE, when is a hearsay statement NOT excluded by the rule against hearsay?

A

When the statement:

Has equivalent circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness;

Is offered as evidence of a material fact;

Is more probative on the point for which it is offered than any other evidence that can be obtained by reasonable means; AND

Admitting it will best serve the interests of justice.

* CA does not have the above catch-all hearsay exception.

Priority: Low

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hearsay Exceptions

What is a Present Sense Impression?

What statements does this apply to in CA?

A

A statement describing an event made by the declarant;

While observing the event; OR

Immediately thereafter.

In CA: This is called a Contemporaneous Statement, and applies when the statement: (1) is offered to explain, qualify, or make declarant’s conduct understandable; AND (2) was made while declarant was engaged in such conduct.

Priority: HIGH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Hearsay Exceptions

What is an Excited Utterance (or Spontaneous Statement as referred to in CA)?

A

A statement:

Relating to a startling event or condition,

Made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement that the event/condition caused.

Priority: HIGH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hearsay Exceptions

Business Records are an exception to the Hearsay rule.

When are they admissible under the FRE?

A

If it is:

A record of events, conditions, opinions, or diagnoses;

Kept in the regular course of business;

Made at or near the time of the matter described;

Made by a person with knowledge of the matter;

The regular practice of the business to make the record;
AND

The opponent party does not show a lack of trustworthiness in making the record.

Priority: HIGH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hearsay Exceptions

Business Records are an exception to the Hearsay rule.

When are they admissible in CA?

A

The same elements have to be met as required under the FRE.

However, in CA the exception DOES NOT include records of opinions or diagnosis, and the party introducing the business record has the burden of showing that the record was made under circumstances indicating trustworthiness.

Priority: HIGH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hearsay Exceptions

Are Statements made for Medical Diagnosis or Treatment an exception to Hearsay rule?

A

YES, when:

It’s made for and reasonably pertinent to a medical diagnosis, AND

It describes medical history or symptoms (past or present).

In CA: Statements made concerning a person’s past physical state are only admissible IF they were made to medical personnel for the diagnosis/treatment of a child abuse/neglect victim under 12.

Priority: Medium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hearsay Exceptions

Are Statements of Mental, Emotional, or Physical Conditions an exception to the Hearsay rule?

A

Yes, the declarant’s then existing state of mind (motive, intent, or plan) OR their emotional, sensory, or physical condition areexceptions to the Hearsay rule.

HOWEVER:

Statements of memory or belief offered to prove a fact believed or remembered are NOT admissible, unless it relates to the validity/terms of the declarants will.

Priority: HIGH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hearsay Exceptions

What is a Dying Declaration?

In what cases may it be offered?

A

It is a Hearsay exception, and is admissible when:

The declarant is unavailable (In CA, must be deceased);

The declaration was made under a sense of impending death; AND

Was about the circumstances that put the declarant in the position of impending death. (In CA, must concern what killed him).

*Used in civil cases and criminal homicide cases (CA = any criminal case).

Priority: Medium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hearsay Exceptions

When is a declarant deemed Unavailable?

A

If he:

Is exempted due to privilege;

Refuses to testify despite a court order (not applicable in CA);

Testifies that he doesn’t remember the matter;

Can’t be present to testify due to death or illness; OR

He is beyond the reach of the court’s subpoena.

*Unavailability must NOT have been caused by either party.

Priority: HIGH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hearsay Exceptions

Under the FRE, what records are admissible under the Government or Public Records hearsay exception?

A

Policies and practices of a public office.

Observations in accordance with duties by law (except police reports in criminal cases).

Factual findings from a legally authorized investigation, BUT only in:

Civil cases; and

Against the government in criminal cases.

*Record will not be admitted if opposing party shows they were made under circumstances lacking trustworthiness.

Priority: Medium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hearsay Exceptions

In California, what records are admissible under the Government or Public Records hearsay exception?

A

A writing that is:

Made by and within the scope of duty of a public employee;

Made at or near the time of the act/condition/event; AND

The record was made under circumstances indicating trustworthiness.

Priority: Medium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hearsay Exceptions

When is a Past Recollection Recorded admissible?

A

If:

The witness had personal knowledge of the events at one time;

The writing was made/adopted by the witness;

The writing was made while the events were still fresh;

The writing is accurate;
AND

The witness can no longer remember the event.

Priority: Medium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Right to Confront Witnesses

When does an out-of-court statement violate a Defendant’s 6th Amendment rights?

A

When:

The statement is testimonial;

The declarant is unavailable to be cross-examined at trial;
AND

The defendant didn’t have an opportunity to cross-examine the declarant before trial.

**Exceptions: dying declarations, wrongdoing by a defendant.

Priority: HIGH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Right to Confront Witnesses

What types of statements are testimonial in nature?

A

Statements made to grand juries;
AND

Statements made to police whose primary purpose is to collect testimony to be used at a later trial.

(It is NOT testimonial if used to assist police in an emergency.)

Priority: HIGH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Spousal Immunity?

(FRE vs. CA)

A

FRE:

A witness-spouse in a valid marriage may refuse to testify against his/her spouse in a criminal case. Spousal Immunity DOES NOT apply in civil cases.

CA:

The spouse holding the privilege may refuse to testify in BOTH criminal and civil cases.

Priority: Medium

17
Q

What is the privilege of Confidential Marital Communications?

A

Communications between spouses are privileged if:

Made during the course of a valid marriage; AND

Were intended to be confidential.

*Applies in both civil and criminal cases, held by both spouses even after a divorce.

Priority: Medium

18
Q

In what circumstances do the Spousal Privileges (spousal immunity and confidential marital communications) NOT apply?

A

In cases between the spouses.

When a spouse commits a crime against the other spouse or their children.

Priority: N/A

19
Q

What does the Attorney Work Product Doctrineprotect?

Under what circumstances is it NOT protected?

A

It protects ALL materials prepared by an attorney or his agents in anticipation of or during litigation. (In CA: Only materials prepared in anticipation of litigation are deemed work product).

They are protected UNLESS a party can show:

A substantial need for the materials exists; AND

A substantial equivalent of the materials cannot be obtained without undue hardship.

Priority: HIGH

20
Q

Attorney Work Product Doctrine (California)

Absolute Privilege

vs.

Qualified Privilege

A

Absolute: Materials prepared in anticipation of litigation and are comprised of the attorneys’ mental impressions, notes, or opinions. These are absolutely protected and are NOT discoverable.

Qualified: All other materials prepared in anticipation of litigation are deemed as qualified work product. These may be discoverable upon showing of substantial need and inability to obtain elsewhere.

Priority: HIGH

21
Q

What is the Attorney-Client Privilege?

A

It protects confidential communications between an Attorney and Client from disclosure if the communication:

Was confidential; AND

Made to facilitate legal services.

*The client holds the privilege.

Priority: HIGH

22
Q

When does the Attorney-Client Privilege NOT apply?

A

When:

Legal services are sought to further a crime or fraud;

There is litigation related to the breach of duty between attorney and client; OR

Jointly represented clients are subsequently involved in a civil litigation against each other.

*CA: Privilege DOES NOT survive the client, and does not apply if the attorney believes disclosure is necessary to prevent a crime likely to result in bodily harm or death.

Priority: HIGH

23
Q

What is the Physician-Patient Privilege?

A

It protects confidential communications between a Physician and Patient from disclosure if the communication:

Was confidential; AND

Made for the purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment.

*The patient holds the privilege (not the physician).

Priority: Low

24
Q

When is the Physician-Patient Privilege recognized?

(CA vs. Federal)

A

CA: Recognizes the privilege

Federal Courts: DO NOT recognize the privilege

*Exception: Federal courts will recognize it when:

it’s a civil case;

a claim/defense is based on state law; AND

state law recognizes a physician-patient privilege.

Priority: Low