Criminal Law 41-50 Flashcards

1
Q

Insanity

What is the Model Penal Code Test?

A

As a result of a mental disease or defect, the defendant was:

Unable to appreciate the criminality of the conduct; OR

Unable to conform his actions to the law.

Priority: Low

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Insanity

What is the Irresistible Impulse Test?

A

Defendant’s mental illness made him:

Unable to control his actions; OR

Unable to conform his actions to the law.

Priority: Low

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Insanity

What is the Durham Test?

A

Defendant must show that his unlawful conduct was the product of mental illness.

Priority: Low

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Justification – Self-Defense

Deadly Force

vs.

Non-Deadly Force

A

Deadly Force is justified when: (1) the defendant kills another on a reasonable belief, (2) that he was in imminent danger of being killed or suffering great bodily injury, and (3) the use of deadly force was necessary to defend against the danger.

Non-Deadly Force is justified when: (1) the defendant reasonably believes, (2) that he is imminent danger of being harmed, and (3) the force used is proportional to the harm threatened.

Priority: Medium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When may an aggressoruse self-defense?

A

If:

He withdraws from the altercation andcommunicates such intent; OR

The other person suddenly escalates the fight with deadly force and withdrawal is not possible.

Priority: Medium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Justification – Self-Defense

What is Imperfect Self-Defense?

A

When the defendant kills another based on a good faith belief that:

She was in imminent danger of being killed or suffering great bodily injury; AND

The use of deadly force was necessary to defend against the danger; BUT

At least one of those beliefs was unreasonable.

*This can reduce a murder charge to manslaughter.

Priority: Low

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Voluntary Intoxication

vs.

Involuntary Intoxication

(as a defense)

A

Voluntary Intoxication: ONLY a defense to specific intent crimes if it negates the state of mind required to commit the offense.

Involuntary Intoxication: A defense to ALL crimes if the defendant is deemed insane at the time of the offense.

Priority: Low

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Defenses

Legal Impossibility

vs.

Factual Impossibility

A

Legal Impossibility: IS a defense. Occurs when the defendant’s acts would nothave constituted a crime, even if the acts were as the defendant assumed.

Factual Impossibility: Is NOT a defense. Occurs when the defendant’s acts would have constituted a crime, BUT FOR a circumstance or fact unknown to the defendant.

Priority: Medium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Defenses

Mistake of Fact

vs.

Mistake of Law

A

Mistake of Fact: Is a defense if it negates the state of mind required for the offense.

Mistake of Law (not knowing the activity was illegal): Generally, NOT a defense to a crime.

Priority: Low

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What must a defendant prove to succeed with Entrapment as an affirmative defense?

A

That:

The police created the criminal environment; AND

The defendant was not predisposed to commit the crime.

Priority: Low

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly