evidence Flashcards
Leading Questions
- NOT Allowed on Direct
- ALLOWED for
-basic preliminary info,
-witnesses that need help testifying
-hostile witnesses
Rule of Completeness
If a party introduces part of a written statement, the opposing party may introduce other portions of that statement that are necessary to put the admitted portion into perspective
Present Recollection Refreshed
- Witness has trouble remembering
- Allowed to help witness remember by showing them a document
- Witness looks at notes, remembers, puts notes aside, and proceeds to testify from present memory
- Document does NOT become evidence, witness does NOT read from it
Destruction of Evidence
If a party destroys evidence, presumption that evidence would have been adverse to that party
Relevance
Evidence is relevant if it is both MATERIAL and PROBATIVE
Exclusion of Relevant Evidence that is Prejudicial
Judge may exclude if risk of prejudice substantially outweighs probative value
R > PV
Character Evidence, Generally
- Cannot argue that a person acted in conformity w/ a particular character trait
- Prevents a party from proving a character trait in order to show action in conformity w/ that character
** CAN be introduced if not to show propensity, but rather for some other purpose, or if character is an essential element (or to show propensity of being a liar for impeachment ig)
Methods of Proving Character
When character evidence IS admissible,
- CAN be proved through reputation or opinion testimony
- CANNOT be proved by specific bad acts
Character Evidence, Criminal Defendant’s Character
- P cannot introduce evidence of bad character, unless door is opened
- D can introduce a pertinent trait of character, but this opens the door
- If door is opened, P can attack D’s character (can use specific acts)
- D cannot use specific acts
Character Evidence, Criminal Victim’s Character
- D may bring evidence about V’s character, including pertinent trait, but this opens door
- If door is open, P can introduce evidence that V is not [character trait] AND can introduce evidence that D is [character trait]
Mimic Evidence
May be introduced for purpose other than propensity:
- Motive
- Intent
- Absence of Mistake
- Modus Operandi
- Common Plan or Scheme
Habit Evidence
- Evidence of something routine, regular, or automatic
- Admissible to prove action in conformity w/ that habit
Witness Competency
- Anyone who has Personal Knowledge of the matter about which they are going to testify and is willing to make an oath to tell the truth
Juror as a Witness
- may NOT testify as a witness in a trial in front of the jury they are a part of
- may NOT testify as a witness into an inquiry into the validity of a verdict
- MAY testify after trial about PREJUDICIAL information brought to the jury’s attention, an OUTSIDE INFLUENCE was improperly brought, a CLERICAL ERROR was made in entering verdict, or a juror RELIED on RACIAL animus
Ways to Impeach
- Show that the witness is dishonest; bad character for truthfulness
- Bias: Witness has a reason to lie
- Sensory Competence: Witness is mistaken in some way
Impeachment, Character Witness Testimony
- Can introduce character witnesses (c1) who will testify that the target witness (c0) is dishonest
*Reputation or Opinion testimony, NOT Specific Acts
Impeachment, Specific Acts
May Cross Examine c1 about specific acts of dishonesty
- must be probative of untruthfulness
- must have good faith basis
Impeachment, Criminal Convictions
- Prior Crimes involving dishonesty, admissible for impeachment
*Prior Felonies, admissible for impeachment UNLESS R.O.P. [>] PV
- Criminal case, c0: evidence of a prior felony conviction admissible ONLY if PV > prejudicial effect
- 10 yrs since conviction/release from confinement, admissible for impeachment ONLY if PV [>] prejudicial effect AND reasonable advance notice
- Pardoned convictions NOT admissible for impeachment
Impeachment, Prior Inconsistent Statements
- Can be proved w/ extrinsic evidence, but ONLY if witness is given opportunity to explain himself
Rehabilitation of Impeached Witness
1) Give witness chance to explain himself
2) Introduce Prior Consistent Statement of witness
3) If attacked for untruthfulness, then reputation/opinion evidence bolstering their truthfulness can be admitted
Lay Witness
- Generally limited to fact observation, but permitted to testify on their OPINION when:
-Rationally based on their perception
-AND Helpful to a clear understanding - CANNOT offer opinions on scientific/specialized/technical knowledge