eval the teleological argument Flashcards

1
Q

strength - based on our experience of order and purpose…

A
  • uses empirical evidence
  • based on observation of apparent design
  • we can all share in this experience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

strength - it uses a scientific method to arrive at this conclusion…

A
  • uses observation of nature and the world, hypothesis and conclusion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

strength - Swinburne cumulative case…

A
  • Swinburne argues that when used as part of a cumulative argument it strengthens the argument for gods existence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

strength - Swinburne probability…

A
  • Swinburne gives the argument of probability
  • design is more probable than chance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

strength - science is limited…

A
  • some contemporary scientists support design
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

strength - Polkinghorne…

A
  • the big bang and evolution are part of gods design
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

weakness - Hume…

A
  • Hume is an empiricist
  • he accepts things as true when there is empirical evidence for it
  • even if there is a designer, why must it be God
  • this argument makes a leap from saying there is a designer to saying it is god
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

weakness - the universe is unique…

A
  • we therefore have no bases is inferring that there is anything like a human designer behind it
  • ‘if we see a house, we conclude that it had an architect because we have experienced it, but the universe is not like a house’
  • we cannot with the same certainty infer a similar cause, the analogy is imperfect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

weakness - Flew…

A
  • leaky buckets analogy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

weakness - chance…

A
  • the order of the universe may be a result of chance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

weakness - why only one god?…

A
  • could it be a team of gods?
  • if there is a designer, what explanation do we have for the designer?
  • although there is evidence of cause and design, there is no empirical evidence for god
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

weakness - Paley’s analogy is flawed…

A
  • the argument compared the universe to a machine or artefact when it is really more like a living organism
  • paley’s analogy is unsound, humanity and nature is organic and dissimilar to a machine which is mechanical
  • the universe shows signs of disorder and defects, for example, bad design such as blind and deaf people
  • there is also a great deal of random suffering as well as natural disasters such as floods
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

weakness - Darwin and natural selection…

A
  • Darwin proposed the theory that random chance organises life in the universe according to the principles of evolution and natural selection
  • natural selection works on a principle of survival of the fittest - the strongest survive and pass on their genes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

weakness - Dawkin and evolution…

A
  • evolution explains the signs of design
  • Dawkin uses Darwin’s theory to argue that evolution gives the impression of design
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

weakness - god of the gaps…

A
  • the argument is guilty of arguing for a ‘god of the gaps’ - what we cannot explain, we say it is god
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

weakness - design is only apparent…

A
  • there may be order but there is no evidence of intention