Ethics Slideshow 1: Introduction/Moral Theory Flashcards
Section 3
Who is said that justice demands not only impartiality, but that we treat people fairly and in proportion to their needs and merits.
“All ethical doctrines worth our attention take consequences into account in judging rightness. One which did not would simply be irrational, crazy.”
John Rawls (1921-2002)
What are Deontology: Duty-based ethics?
- Duty is the basis of morality.
- Duty is doing what is right for its own sake.
- We see deontological very strongly in many world religions.
Who said that good will is related to proper self-esteem. A person of “good will” can be counted on to do what is right regardless of emotion, external pressures, etc.
An action that is done to conform to cultural norms has no moral value, even if it appears laudable.
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)
What was Kant’s Categorical Imperative
The categorical imperative is universally binging.
Reason is the basis for morality, so humans are very important. Autonomy is essential for dignity, so only rational beings have inherent worth. Therefore rational beings can never be means, they are not expendable. They are an end in themselves.
Humans have free will, but everything else in nature operates according to physical laws.
Categorical Imperative Continued
Provides a framework for discovering moral maxims
A maxim is a duty. According to the categorical imperative.
- Rational beings must be treated with dignity.
- We must be able to universalize.
Morals maxims or duties apply to everyone in every place. What the moral maxims are, however, is a question.
What are the Principle Of Reciprocity?
- Reciprocity is similar to the categorical imperative.
- it is found in Christianity, Confucianism, etc.
- We should treat others how we want to be treated.
- Assumes the human person is an end in him or herself.
- In Christianity, it is referred to as the Golden Rule. “Do to others whatever you would have them do to you. This is the law and the prophets,” Jesus in Matthew 7:12.
- In Confucianism, it is the “Silver Rule,” stated in the negative. He believed abiding by this rule, along with knowing one’s duties and relationships, would lead to a well-ordered society.
Why is Categorical Imperative is not up for debate?
According to Kant, moral maxims/duties must be
- Consistent with the categorical imperative
- Universally applicable
Prior to a decision regarding the universal nature of a maxim, we may debate their truthfulness.
For Kant, universally binding moral maxims are absolute. (“They are binding in every place and every time, to every person.)
What are the most moral philosophers agree with Kant that maxims/duties are universal, but disagree that they are absolute?
- Moral duties are prima facie rather than absolute.
- Prima facie duties are universal, but may on occasion be overridden by stronger moral claims.
- Prima Facie=Latin, literally “first face” Translated “on the face” or “at first appearance/impression”
Who is W.D. Ross (1877-1971)
Sir William D. Ross was a Scottish philosopher. He wrote The Right and The Good and other important works.
- Moral duties cannot be absolute. There are situations where they conflict.
- Duties are contextual.
- Unlike Kant, Ross says consequences do matter.
- Moral duties can’t be overridden by nonmoral duties.
What are Ross’ Seven Prima Facie Duties
- Beneficence
- Nonmaleficence
(Future-Looking) - Fidelity
- Reparation
- Gratitude
(Based on Past Obligations) - Self-Improvement
- Justice
(Ongoing)
What is nonmaleficence?
- Do no harm. We hear this in the Hippocratic Oath.
- ahimsa (nonharm or nonviolence), derived from Hinduism and Buddhism
what is beneficence?
positive duty to promote goodness
what is fidelity?
- to be true, dependable, trustworthy
- Xiao pr filial piety, Confucianism
What is gratitude?
thankfulness, gratefulness, for both unearned and earned favors done for us by others
What is reparation?
making up for the past harm we have done
what is self-improvement?
striving to improve our moral knowledge and virtue
what is justice?
giving each person equal consideration
- retributive justice- punishment in proportion to the crime
- distributive justice- fair distribution of benefit and burdens in society
How cam distributive justice can become problematic?
- conflicts of interest
- scarce resources
John Rawls & Justice as Fairness
- Political philosopher, wrote A Theory of Justice 1971
- Impartiality (defined as everyone being treated the same) is insufficient.
- To be treated fairly is to be treated in proportion to one’s needs and merits
- “Natural lottery” and historical circumstance
- Redistribution of wealth does not change systemic problems.
Rawls’ Veil of Ignorance
- Concept of using a social contract that is unbiased and based on impartiality.
2, The idea is that we will be ignorant to the advantages and disadvantages we will receive in life. - What governmental/economic system would we choose if we did not know what advantages/disadvantages we would have? This is a thought experiment.
moral dilemma
when moral duties conflict…..because moral duties are prima facie, when an issue involves a moral conflict, we must carefully weigh each duty and decide which is the most compelling. Honor as many duties as possible.
2. According to Ross, there is o formula. Use intuition and assess context.
3. Reason + creativity + prioritizing of duties = best possible solution
Strengths & Limitations of Deontology
Strengths-
1. recognizes duty as important. Things are inherently right or wrong
2. Highlights important values as universally applicable.
3. The reasoning human person has inherent value, is never a means.
4. is not consequentialist.
Weaknesses
1. No strategy for moral dilemmas
2. Too autonomous– does not take into account the wider community,
3. Overemphasizes justice (duty) and does not take into account care, sentiment.
4. Does not take into account consequences.