Ethics Exam 3 Flashcards
What is the catholics church’s stance towards technology?
Green says technology should be divided by good, neutral, and bad, because technology has a means to an end
Catholic churchs stance on technology relates to actions as either
prohibited, permissible, obligatory
The church holds that faith and reason lead to the same?
Truth and are not in opposition to each other
Histrically christians and catholic institutions have been at the forefront of?
Scientific dicovery and development in engineering and architecture
The church has disapproved certain technologies like ?
Weapons technologies (Just war theory)
Human reproduction technologies
The catholic church opposes the?
Technocratic paradigm and scientism
The technocratic paradigm
can be understood as the belief that every problem is merely one of efficiency and that therefore technology can solve every problem, without the intervention of ethics. The technocratic paradigm explicitly violates the catholic church.
As humans become more powerful we can?
Do more and have more choices therefore will be more things to say not to
Corporate social responsibility (people planet profit )
Based on the premise that an organization should take responsibility for its impact on environment, community, and welfare of its employees
Corporate social responsibility expands from
responsibility from guideline of respect to guideline of care/CST
Supply chain substantiality
developing and maintaining a supply chain that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs
Enviormental, social, and governance, aka stakeholder captialism
investing refers to a set of standards for a company’s behavior used by socially conscious investors to screen potential investments, social credit score for corporations
ESG enviormental criteria
consider how a company’s safeguards the environments, including corporate policies addressing climate change for example
ESG social critiea
examine how it manages relationships with employees, suppliers, customers, and the communities where it operates
ESG goverance critea
deals with a company leadership, executive pay audits, internal controls, and shareholder rights
Catholic social teaching
Catholic doctrines on matters of human dignity and common good in society
10 building blocks of catholic social teaching
- The principal of human dignity
- The principal of respect for human life
- The principal association
- The principal of participation
- The principle of preferential protection for the poor and vulnerable
- The principal of solidarity
- The principal of stewardship
- The principle of subsidiarity
- The principle of human equality
- The principle of common good
Shareholder theory
According to economist Milton Friedman, the social responsibility of business is to increase its profits
“Insofar as (business executives) actions in accord with his social responsibility reduce returns to stockholders”
Problem with shareholder theory
short term oriented, evil, or greedy managers or owners
Can ESG/CSR/CST (stakeholder capitalism) and the Friedman doctrine (shareholder capitalism) be reconciled?
Shareholders and other stakeholders may want managers to act in ESG/CSR ways even if profits are reduced, pay is reduced, and prices are increased
Some ESG/CSR-type actions may support the long-term profits of a business so that there is no tradeoff between ESR/CSR and profits
ESG/CSR type actions may increase employee and customer loyalty
Reducing waste may increase efficiency
7 themes of catholic social teaching
- Life and dignity of the human person
- Call to family, community, and participation
- Rights and responsibilities
- Option for the poor and vulnerable
- The dignity of work and the rights of workers
- Solidarity
- Care for god’s creation
The principal of human dignity
“Every human being is created in the image of God and redeemed by Jesus Christ, and therefore is invaluable and worthy of respect as a member if human family”
It is not what you do or what you have that gives you a claim on respect; it is simply being human that esbashlies your dignity, given that dignity, the human person is never a means, always an end
Consistent with Gomez-Lobo on dignity humans as ends not means (contra utilitarianism)
The principal of respect for human life
Human life at every stage of development and decline is precious and therefore worthy of protection and respect. It is always wrong directly to attack and innocent
Implication: technologies that terminate human life after conception or before natural death are evil
The principal of particpation
The human person has a right not to be shut out from participating in those institutions that are necessary for human fulfillment
Work is more than a way to make a living it is a form of continuing participation in God’s creation
This is stated as a “negative right” (violation of the guideline of respect
The principle of subsidiarity
Limits government by insisting that no higher eve log organization should perform any function that can be handled efficiently and effectively at a lower level of organization that is closer to the problems and closer to the ground
Encouraged decentralized voluntary associations
Note: these principals fall into the liberal/conservative paradigm
Guideline of care (what are the two ides aligned with the guideline of care)
Preference for the poor and vulnerable
If the good of all, the common good, is to prevail, preferential protection must move toward those affected adversely by the absence of power and the presence of privation
Solidarity
We are our brothers and sisters’ keepers we are one human family, loving out neighbor has global dimensions in an independent world
Guideline of respect
Stewardship
“The catholic tradition insists that we show our respect for the creator by our stewardship of creation.”
Death by robots
US citizens die 3 years sooner than people in other rich countries-increased US deaths driven by less educated working age adults
1 robot per 1,000 workers=8 male deaths and 4 female deaths per 100,000 workers aged 45-54
Drug overdose, suicide, homicide, cancer, CV problems
Migrating factors death by robots
Medicaid/UI generosity (overdose, suicide)
Pro union policies, high minimum wages (suicide)
Maybe less opioid availbilty (weak association)
Robots coming for our jobs optimistc scenario
Robots wil relieve humans from physical and mental drudgery
Robots will complement humans not replace them
Increased productivity will be tide that lifts all boats
Humans will have more time for lesiure and creative pursuits
Human will beneift from cheaper and better products and services
Robots coming for our jobs Pessmistic scenario
Robots will replace human workers snce they will be smarter and stronger than humans
Humans will lose sense of purpose
There will be masters and serfs
The time its different
Systems that dissimulate by design
Commercial thermostats
Institutional malware
Commercial sensors and law enforcement stingrays and dirt boxes to capture cell phone data
Nudging (karen Yeung)
using behavioral science insights to influence individual choices “libertarian paternalism”
Uses the framework o human floruishing dignity respect and autonomy
Hyper nudge
insights gained through big data are used to channel user choices in the direction preferred by the choice architect through processes that are both subtle and powerful
Dynamic reconguration
refinement of induvial choice environment, induvial data feedback incorporation of population wide trends. This is what turns a nudge into a hyper nudge
Examples of a hypernudge
search engine results or news feeds designed to increase time online or target applications Amazon presentation of products
The social dilemma 3 goals
engagement, growth, advertisement
The social dilemmma
Use of psychological manipulation and behavior modification (based on an asymmetry of knowledge
Whats the issue with the choice nudge lies chapter
All business care about is profit.”
“Corporations are greedy.”
Organizations have objectives and are organized to fulfill those objectives
Survelliance Capitalism
Describes a market driven process where the commodity for sale is personal datat and behavioral predictions based on the aggregation of such data is captured via the internet or other means that can be digitized
This activity is often carried out by companies that provide us with free online services such as search engines (Google) and social media platforms (facebook
The techniques of surveillance capitalism can and are being applied to the?
government/political sphere
Key criticisms of surveillance capitalism
Invasion of privacy
Manipulation of behavior
Concentration of power
Lack of transparency
Use of people as “mere means”
Themes of survelliance captialism
About us, not for us”
“Inevitable outgrowth of digital technology”
Attribution of agency (free will) to technologies (example: search engines retain information
*People as raw materials rather than ends in themselves
Zuboff
privacy is a social problem, privacy is not private, freedom from uncertainty is no freedom
Surveillance capitalism started with internet companies but now seeking surveillance divided
A society is built that creates human needs, then surveillance capitalism exploits those needs
Is capitalism ethical?
In its pure, theoretical form, a good “yes” argument can be made under natural law, ultraism, and moral libertinism
Real world issues associated with captialism
Government
Concentration of wealth and power
Unfairness of goods of fortune
Greed can lead to good or bad
Hagans two cents
A system built on free will works best in a culture made up of ethical people
The merger of state and corporate power must be avoided
Autonomous (self-driving) vehicles
Accident avoidance-deciding who lives and who dies
Electric cars (EVs)
Environmental impact
Supply chain issues-sourcing of minerals disposition of batteries
Opportunity costs-could the extra cost of electric cars be better spent elsewhere
level 0 layers of autonomy
all major systems are controlled by humans
level 1 layers of autonomy
certain systems such as cruise control or automatic braking may be controlled by the car one at a time
level 2 layers of autonomy
The car offers at least two simultaneous automated functions, like acceleration and steering, but requires humans for operation
level 3 layers of autonomy
The car can management all safety-critical functions under certain conditions, but the driver is expected to take over when alerted
Level 4 layers of autonomy
The car is fully autonomous in some driving scenarios though not all
Level 5 layers of autonomy
The car is completely capable of self-driving in every situation
Will your electric car save the world or wreck it?
The case for EVs assumes carbon emissions cause catastrophic climate change. Yields a metric that works well with a utilitarian perspective or the CST stewardship principle.
Natural perspective electric cars
Rule 1: don’t directly attack a human good, don’t commit an evil act to achieve some good end
Rule 2: guideline of care: where possible and practical seek to advance the good of others (but not if it violated rule 1)
Social engineering oppurtunites
o Wasteful and polluting cars
o Unhealthy food/drinks
o Wasteful insufficient big houses
o Low density subrarban living
o Poor health habits
o Bad child rearing
o Unnecessary travel
o Optimize travel talents and employment
o Healthcare spending
Green says technology is hallmark or morality… meaning
technology is whether is influences good or bad moral actions
It’s a synthesis of various doctrines. As such, various commentators include different elements and emphasize different aspects
Catholic social teaching
Catholic social teaching attemtpts to balance?
Attempts to balance respect for human liberty, including the right to private property and subsidiarity, and concern for the whole society, including the weakest, and poorest
Privacy
is the ability of an induvial or group to seclude themselves or information about themselves, and thereby express themselves selectively
From the perspective of those minimizing the significant of a right to privacy
Privacy is only a concern of aging old-school civil libertarians; it’s not relevant to today’s concerns-equity, inclusion, crime, terrorism, etc.
We can’t do anything about loss of privacy anyway
Privacy provides care for: drug dealers, smugglers, tax evaders, money launders, child molesters, human trafficker’s, terrosts, insurrections, cyber bullies
Privacy advocate Greenwald on “only bad people seek privacy”
He concluded that only people who will seek out privacy are bad people, and we should have all kinds of reasons for avoiding
He says “doing bad things” means doing something that poses meaningful challenges to the exercise of our own power
Natural law on privacy
Privacy connected to concepts of dignity, freedom, integrity
Utiliarnism on privacy
privacy “right” contingent on the situation
Moral libertarnism on privacy
right to be left alone unless an agreement is made otherwise
Privacy in the “Good view”
that contributes to human flourishing and well-being. It allows people to develop personality, expresses their options, and pursue their interests without undue interference or coercion
Privacy as Duty
that respects the dignity, autonomy and freedom of others. It requires people to refrain from invading or disclosing the personal information or affairs o others without their consent or a valid reason.
Is privacy found in the US consitution?
Is it found in the US constitution?
Not explicitly, but
- 1st amendment protects the privacy of beliefs
- 3rd amendment protects the privacy of the home against the use of it for housing soldiers
- 4th amendment protects privacy again unreasonable searchers
- 5th amendment protects against self-incrimination which in turn protects the privacy of personal information
- 9th amendment justifies the bill of rights to protect privacy in ways not specially provided in the first 8 amendments