Ethics at the End of Life Flashcards
What are the characteristics of a good death?
Communication (patient, carers /relatives, healthcare team) Symptoms well controlled Not distressing Time to plan Preferred place of death
What are the characteristics of a bad death?
Poor communication Perception of failure of healthcare team Distressing symptoms Sudden Catastrophic event, e.g. bleed No time to plan ahead or achieve goals Disagreement
How can quality of life at the end of life be enhanced?
Caring attitude of staff Family visits Physical environment Maintaining control Feeling safe/ not alone Art sessions
What factors have a negative impact of quality of life at the end of life?
Lost independence
Lost activities
Pain/ fear of pain
Feeling a burden
What is collusion?
Collusion refers to a secret agreement made between clinicians and family members to hide the diagnosis of a serious or life-threatening illness from the patient
What are the common reasons for collusion?
Disclosure causes the patient to lose hope
Disclosure leads to depression
Disclosure hastens the progression of the illness and death
Disclosure increases the risk of patient suicide
Disclosure may cause psychological pain for the patient
Family members themselves may not be aware of the nature and severity of the illness
Family members may be in denial
Family members may be in conflict
Why does collusion go against the principles of best medical practice?
Collusion is at odds patient autonomy and to the right to self-determination.
Revealing the diagnosis to relatives before revealing it to patients breaches patients’ right to medical confidentiality.
Patients are unable to give informed consent if they are not aware of the underlying illness and thus may not obtain appropriate or optimum and timely treatment.
Collusion results in a breakdown of the clinician–patient relationship and a loss of trust between patients and clinicians
When is it medically acceptable to let a patient die?
- Medical technology is useless
2. Patients validly refuse a medical technology
What is the difference between euthanasia and physician assisted suicide?
Euthanasia is the act of deliberately ending a person’s life to relieve suffering, e.g. a doctor administering a lethal cocktail of drugs explicitly to end a life. Physician assisted suicide involves prescribing lethal drugs intended explicitly to end a life. The person takes the mediations themselves or is assisted in some way to take them
What are the arguments in support of euthanasia/physician assisted suicide?
Suicide is legal. Those who are so disabled they cannot take their own life are disadvantaged.
Withdrawing and withholding life-prolonging treatment is widely accepted and practised.
The suffering associated with some diseases outweighs the benefits of continuing to live.
Respect for patient autonomy
What are the arguments against authanasia/physician assisted suicide?
Good palliative care obviates the need for PAS.
Discourages palliative care research.
Vulnerable patients are at risk – coercion, feeling like a burden, free up medical resources.
Slippery slope - may lead to involuntary euthanasia for people deemed ‘undesirable’.
Affects other people’s rights, not just the patient.
Contrary to the aims of medicine – promotion of health and life. Patients may lose trust.