Ethics Flashcards
What is the definition of negligence?
- The defendant had a duty of care to the claimant
- There was a breach of the duty of care
- The claimant suffered actionable harm or damage
- The damage was caused by the breach
Who has a duty of care
- Health authority, hospital, senior doctor, and GP
- The doctor/ nurse
Is good samaritans an ethical or legal duty
Ethical
Can a patient sue a doctor for negligence if as a result of his report the person is denied insurance?
No- doctor has duty to insurance not the person
What is meant by breach of duty of care
Failure to reach the level of proficiency of peers
What is the idea behind the Bolam test?
A doctor is not guilty of negligence if he has acted in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical men skilled in that particular art.
This should be judged by ones peers (aka doctors at a similar level, not very senior doctors)
What was the Bolitho modification to the Bolam test
(1) “The court should not accept a defence argument as being ‘reasonable’, ‘respectable’ or ‘responsible’ without first assessing whether such opinion is susceptible to logical analysis”, and
(2) “However, where there is a body of medical opinion which represents itself as ‘reasonable’, ‘respectable’ or ‘responsible’ it will be rare for the court to be able to hold such opinion to be other than represented”.
basically- genuine errors of clinical judgement sare not negligent if based on reasonable skill
What is meant by a breach of commission vs a breach of ommission
Commission: forceps left in the abdomen
Ommission- failure to attend a patient/ diagnose a condition
What is meant by res ipsa loquitur
The mere occurence of some types of accident is sufficient to imply negligence
What is covered in the traditional Hippocratic ethics in terms of what is ethical within research
- Experiment must be placed within a therapeutic or preventitive context
- Any trial should entail potential benefits to the patient/ participant
- Patient shouldn’t be treated as mere means for learning
How did people justify experiements of humans in non-therapeutic circumstances, where consent wasn’t obtained properly
- Search for truth
- Benefit to mankind
- They were already dying
What did Dr. Giuseppe Sanarelli do?
- Searched for causative agent of yellow fever
- Injected candidates without their knowledge or consent
Describe the circumstances that led to the end of self- experimentation
- Team of doctors allowed mosquitos infected with yellow fever to bite the team
- Became illl. one died
Describe the circumstances that led to the paid or unpaid volunteer
- Contract was drawn up allowing participants to receive £100 for being part of the trial and £200 if they becacme sick
What is the name of the code developed at the end of the second world war to ensure that trials were ethical
Nuremberg Code
What are the 2 key points in the Nuremberg code
- Voluntary consent is essential
- Experiement should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society
What are the other points mentioned in the Nuremberg code
- Prior with animals
- Avoid uneccesary harm
- Assurance that no death or injury will result
- Researchers must be scientifically qualified
- Subject has a riight to opt out
- Researcher has duty to stop if it is harmful
What are the basic principles of the Helsinki declaration?
1- Research must conform to basic scientific principles
2- Must conform with local laws
3- Be led by scientifically qualified person who take responsibility for wellbeing of subjects
4- Importance of research objective must be proportional to inherent risk
5- Must assess risks beforehand
6- Respect privacy and autonomy
7- Doctors should abstain from engaging in research
8- Physician must preserve accuracy when publishing results
9- Subjects must be informed of aims
10- Consent should be written and duress
11- In casse of legal incompetence informed consent must be from guardian
Define justice
Each getting what he or she is due
What is formal justice
Impartial and consistent application of principles, whether or not the principles themselves are just
What is substantive justice
When individuals can legitimately demand one another or of their government (positive rights)
What is retributive justice
When and why punishment is justified
What is correct justice
Fairness of demands for civil damages
What is commutative justice
Fairness of wages, prices, and exchanges