ethics Flashcards
who are three key scholars on ethics and the year they were published
pogge 2002, rawls 1999, beitz 1979
what was pogge’s main contribution to ethic in IR
- rich countries are complicit in global poverty
- global economic structures perpetuate inequality
what was rawls view on ethics in IR
- bringing justice and fairness to the international system
- advocates for fair global governance
what was Beitz’s view on ethics
- there should be stronger ethical obligations across borders
what is theoretical pluralism
there is a division of scholars over how to answer questions like
- should the rich redistribute their wealth?
- should the west intervene around the world or is that neo-colonialism
what is normative theorizing
evaluates the rightness and wrongness of things
- is there a better way of doing things
what is rawls ideal and non-ideal theory
- ideal theory is used to form principles for governance where everyone complies with moral principles, what does a perfectly just society look like
- non-ideal theory focuses on real world conditions where there is partial compliance, power imbalances, historical injustices, how do we progress with these constraints
what is a limitation normative theorizing
- should a political philosopher tell people how to live and what rules to abide by (can be unrealistic and dangerous)
what is cosmopolitanism
advocates for:
- universal global ethics
- global justice
- open borders
- focus on the rights and dignity of individuals
what are some limitations to cosmopolitanism
- it can ignore local cultural and traditional differences
- is impractical and can impose western values world wide
what is communitarianism
- rejects universal claims - morality is rooted in shared traditions not abstract things
- specific communities have different ethics norms and priorities which need to be preserved and respected
what are some limitations to communitarianism
-can justify exclusionary authoritarian policies in the name of cultural preservation
what is just war theory
- a summary of when going to war is justified, how it should be fought ethically, and the law after war
what is Jus Ad Bellum
when is going to war justified
- for a moral reason
- only when legal bodies declare war
- the goal of war is peace and war is a last resort
what is Jus In Bello
how should war be fought ethically
- civilians not deliberately targeted
- should not exceed necessary objectives
- ban tactics such as chemical warfare, torture and genocide
what is Just Post Bellum
what should law after war be
- Fair peace terms
- reconstruction and reconciliation
give an example of a just and unjust war
just - ww2, unjust - iraq 2003
what are some key ethical debates
globalization and aid - who is responsible for what
human rights and peace - humanitarian intervention, when to intervene in war or provide support
technology - do robots have responsibility, should we use ai, and drones