Ethical issues Flashcards
Ethical issues (conflict)
Conflict between rights of participants and aims of research. BPS code of conduct is quasi-legal document to protect participants based on 4 principles: respect, competence, responsibility and integrity. Ethics committees weigh up costs eg potential harm, benefits eg value of research, before deciding whether study should go ahead
Informed consent (permission)
informed judgement about whether to take part but may reveal aims. Sign consent form, where appropriate, seek parental consent. Alternative forms of consent:
-Presumptive - ask similar group
-Prior general - agree to be deceived
-Retrospective - consent after study
Deception (misleading)
Deliberately misleading/withholding info so consent is not informed but mild deception ok. At end of study, participants should be given debrief where they’re advised of:
-True aims of investigation
-Details not given during study eg existence of other groups/conditions
-What their data will be used for
-Right to withhold data
Protection from harm (risk)
Participants should be at no more risk than in everyday life.
-Given right to withdraw at each stage of research process
-Reassured behaviour was typical/normal during debriefing
-Researcher should provide counselling if participants have been distressed
Privacy and confidentiality (right to control)
-Right to control info about ourselves. If invaded, confidentiality should be respected.
-If personal details are held they must be protected (legal requirement). Usually no personal details are recorded
-Researchers refer to participants with numbers, initials or false names
-Participants’ personal data cannot be shared with other researchers
correlation
Illustrates strength and direction of association between 2 co-variables
Scattergram
1 co-variable on x axis and other on y
Positive correlation
Co variables increase together
Negative correlation
1 co variable increases, other decreases
Zero correlation
No relationship between variables
Difference between correlations and experiments
Researcher manipulates IV & records effect on DV. In correlation, no manipulation of variables so cause & effect can’t be demonstrated
+ Useful starting point for research -> By assessing strength & direction of relationship, correlations provide measure of how 2 variables relate -> If variables are strongly related may suggest hypotheses for future research
+ Relatively economical -> Unlike lab study, no need for controlled environment and can use 2ndary data -> correlations are less time consuming than experiments
- No cause and effect -> Correlations are often presented as casual, only show how 2 variables are related -> leads to false conclusions about causes of behaviour
- Intervening variables -> Another untested variable may explain relationship between co variables -> lead to false conclusions