Ethical And Legal Issues In Psychiatry Flashcards
What year was the common law and mental capacity act
2005
What is competency
Cognitive ability to understand and weigh up the key issues relevant to the decision
Justifying a mental health Act
Mental illness may affect the process of decision - other than cognitively
Moderate depression may alter values but the person may still have good cognitive abilities
Justifying overruling refusal of treatment
Argue that the illness interferes with their normal values - so respecting the patients autonomy is to respect what that person wages when free from depressive illness
Argue that it is right because it is in their best interests and others to do so and they are suffering from a mental illness
English law takes this second paternalistic approach at least about the treatment of the mental not physical illness
Overruling refusal of treatment
A person can be treated for a mental disorder under the MHA without reference their capacity
What are the ethical problems with overruling refusal of treatment without reference to capacity
It either assumes that the presence of a mental illness automatically renders someone incompetent which is false or it simply discriminates between the physically and mentally ill
Protection of others as well as the patient - not usual in physical disorders to be treated for someone else’s sake
Protection of the patient or the protection of others
The main method by which society protects itself from those dangerous to others is through criminal law - it maybe inappropriate to use the criminal law in the case of the mentally ill they are not responsible for their dangerous acts. The central issue in the case of dangerousness to others in not capacity but responsibility
What is central to overriding refusal for the sake of the person himself
Question of capacity
Is the MHA discriminatory
It allows a competent patients refusal to be overruled
Gives society much wider powers to forcibly restrain, for the protection of others mentally disordered people compared to those without a mental disorder
-dangerously mentally ill people can be detained almost indefinitely
But those without a mental disorder cannot be kept in a secure place if they have no yet committed a crime or have served their prison sentence
Mental health act 1983
Dangerous to either themselves or others
Informal and compulsory admissions
Routes to compulsory admission.
Admission for assessment S2
Emergency assessment s4
Admission for treatment S3
Admission for assessment s2
Grounds:
A: mental disorder = nature and degree which Warrants detention - assessment
AND
Dangerous
Application by relative or social worker
Supported by 2 Drs 1 psychiatrist
Lasts for 28 days
Emergency assessment s4
Grounds the same as s2 Mental disorder = nature and decree which warrants detention - assessment AND Dangerous Application 1Dr 72hours
Admission for treatment s3
Grounds : mental disorder - nature which warrants treatment in hospital AND
Dangerous
AND
Mental illness is treatable = alleviate or prevent deterioration in mental illness
Treatment includes for the symptoms
Application similar to s2 where the SW names the application NR must be consulted
6months
Period is renewable
Cannot be used to enforce treatment on an outpatient basis
Amendments to the 1983MHA -> MHA 2007
Removal of categories of mental disorder
Section 1 amends the wording of the definition in the 1983 from ‘mental illness, arrested or incomplete development or mind, psychopathic disorder and any other disorder or disability to
-> any disorder or disability of the mind
Section 4 replacement of treat ability and care tests with appropriate treatment put into