Establishment of Nazi Dictatorship and Domestic Policies, Feb 1933-1939 Flashcards
How did Hitler enforce his ‘legal revolution’?
Reichstag Election, March 1933- used intimidation and blamed issues on democracy and communists. Hoped to increase Nazi vote and enhance status. Didn’t get majority they needed so couldn’t create any changes. But high turnout due to SA intimidation.
Reichstag Fire, February- blamed on a communist, leads to signing of decree for protection which gave power to central govt, lots of anti-Nazis arrested and more violence.
Enabling Law, March 1933- Proposal to get rid of parliament and full power to Chancellor. ‘Revolution from below’ challenged Hitler’s aim for a ‘legal dictatorship’. Day of Potsdam combined National Socialism and old Germany legally. Promised to leave Catholic Church alone, securing their vote and Enabling Law was passed.
How did Hitler control the Lander?
March 1933- dissolved regional parliaments and replaced with Nazi dominated acceptable majorities
April 1933- Reich governors, normally party Gauliter with total power and only fullfilled Reich wishes
January 1934- regional state parliaments and subordinated to Ministry of the Interiors
How did Hitler control the Trade Unions?
In 1933 it was really weak- wanted to work with the Nazis.
1st May declared a holiday but in the end the SA and SS occupied trade union premises and took leaders to concentration camps.
Collected into German Labor front- more used to control and had no rights to negotiate rights
How did Hitler control other political parties?
Needed to have one-party state.
Communists outlawed since fire.
Assets of Social Democrats seized
June 1933- most other parties chose to dissolve themselves.
Catholic Center Party gave up in July 1933.
Evidence Gleichschaltung was not successful.
Limited influence on Church, army and big business.
Civil service and education only partially reformed.
Conflict of ‘revolution of below’ vs ‘revolution from above’.
What was the situation when Hitler became Chancellor in 1933?
Only 12 Nazis in cabinet
Hitler didn’t have a majority so they couldn’t introduce much legislation.
Chancellor dependent on favor of Hindenburgh
Power of the army or trade unions were a threat.
He was leader of the largest party
Alternative to Hitler was civil war or communism
Access to govt resources eg police and propoganda
Very clever politician
What was the position of the SA in 1933?
‘Second revolution’ brewing among left-wing, younger part of SA.
They were angry about their limited role in the Nazi party.
Rohm criticized Hitler’s politics and didn’t want the SA to become purely an instrument of propaganda.
Outline the build up and events of the Knight of the Long Knives.
Army and SA were at odds. Hitler needed the backing of the army more as they were a threat, had connection and skills.
June 1934- Hitler and generals decided to oppose the SA
Knight of the Long Knives- Rohm and leaders shot, weapons provided by the army. Took out Schleicer and Strasser.
How significant was the Knight of the Long Knives?
German army backed Hitler- Oath of the Army
SA disarmed and had role in propaganda only.
Led to the emergence of SS- important to terror
Established Hitler’s supremacy, able to legal commit murder. Established ‘personal dictatorship’
Summaries the period of Glichustang
Terror- SA, Knight of the Long Knives
Legality- dissolution of parties, enabling law
Decption- misled SA and Trade Unions
Propoganda- Myths about Hitler being respectable, Goebbels
Weak opposition- left was divided, legacy of economic issues
Sympathy from the right- army, civil service not loyal to Weimar and accepted Night of the Long Knives
Was a Gleichshultang a revolution?
Yes- stopped autonomy of states, intolerant to opposition, Reichstag impotent.
No- Churches and big business unaffected, no fundamental changes socially or economically, had to compromise to legality
What was Hitler’s role in the Nazi dictatorship?
Hitler’s role as all powerful dictator and Fuhrer vs the chaos of Nazi party and his whims.
Charismatic, ordinary man vs lazy and inexperienced
Germany’s savior and Fuhrer with control of army vs reliance on subordinates and lack of constitution
Why was the Party not able to dominate state institutions?
State officials were good at their jobs
March converts diluted party
Hitler’s lack of clarity eg 1939 law to unify party and state but 1934 party supreme
Role of state institutions
Reich Chancellery: Lammers link between Hitler and other organisations, made legislation but hard to coordinate organisations.
Government Ministries: conflict from mid 30s with Party
Regional State Governments: took Oath and happy t work with party but 1933 Special Court, 1934 People’s Court, study of National Socialism and Night and Fog usurped their power.
Role of party institutions
1933 aimed at getting support eg Hitler Youth, SA
Conflict eg Goebbels’s propaganda machine and Ministry of Propaganda
Hierarchy meant poor government eg Gauliters
Resolved conflict: Hess- vet promotions, 1939 Civil servants have to be party members, Bormann’s Department of Internal Party Affairs and Departments of State Affairs
What were the main roles of Himmler’s ‘Police State’?
Policing (Gestapo, Kripo): general law and stopping enemies, arrests without trial
Intelligence (Gestapo, Kripo, SD): used informers to find opponents
Opponents: Strict camps run by Death’s Head Units, used to deter and detain non-conformists.
Waffen SS: taking over army and very committed