Establishing Collective Representation Flashcards
3 Routes to Organization under the NLRA
1) NLRA certification election (9)
2) board bargaining to remedy the employer ULPs when evidence of union majority (Gissel order)
3) employer voluntary recognition (9)
NLRA(2)(5) - labor org. defined
organization of any kind which employees participate and exists for the purpose of dealing with employer regarding grievances, labor disputes, wages, rates of pay, hours of employment, and conditions of work
Employer Dominated Labor Organization
NOT ALLOWED under 8(a)(2) when it interferes with the formation/admin of any labor organization to contribute financially/support it
Employee committees can get fishy, fast
Electromation
Two fold inquiry - is this a labor organization? is it dominating?
Electromation - Labor Org. Elements 2(5)
1) employee participation
2) purpose to deal with employer
3) concern conditions of empm
4) evidence representing ees
Electromation - Dominated elements
interfere with formation, and administration. and finance
Crown, Cork, and Seal (2001)
If an employer has a committee to deal with the “managerial” functions are NOT dealing with in NLRA - thus, not a labor org.
Differnet than electromation because of WHY they were meeting
Employer may under 8(a)(2)
Suggestion box, Poll meployee, talk to committees set up by employees (WITHOUT bargaining), establish committees to not talk about terms of employment (AKA quality circles), establish committees to do management things with
Minority Bargaining
No obligation of the er to bargain with the minority union because on the “exclusive” representation in Section 9 of the NLRA
Int’l Ladies Garment Worker’s Union
Employer violated 8(a)(1) by agreeing to represent ees because it was the minority of employees, even if it was in good faith
Union violated section 8(b)(1)(A) by acceptance of exclusive bargaining power when there was no majority
ER in trouble though because they did, regardless of mistake
NLRA 9(A)
representatives designated/selected for the purposes of CB by the majority of the unit shall be the EXCLUSIVE reps of the employees
J.I. Case Co. v. NLRB
exclusive representative preclude inconsistent bargaining
NLRA 8(a)(5) & (d) - good faith bargaining
Obligation for the Union to fairly represent all employees in the unit EVEN THOSE NOT IN THE UNIT
Emporium Capwell Co. v. Western Addition
Individuals still have civil rights, but the most effective way to pursue them is under the NLRA’s CB
NLRA and inclusion
NLRB wants inclusion to ALL union members, do not want to separate identity groups because the right to organize are collective under NRLA (7) because they have the most power to bargain
Duty of fair representation
exclusive representation required to represent all members of the bargaining unit FAIRLY, whether or not they are members
Steele v. Louisville (black and white firemen)
Labor unions must act as the statutory representatives of the craft, and cannot refuse to perform without hostile discrimination, fairly, impartially, and in good faith
Duty to fairly represent suits - why are they weird?
Sue the union and the employer at the same time
Regulation of access imbalance
Republic aviation versus Lechmere
Republic Aviation
Employer property rights are subordinated by employee’s right to organize under Section 7, but employer general discrimination against solicitation on company property is a ULP under 8(a)(1)
Lechmere
No section 7 rights for employee organizers to have access to employees on company property unless remote location exception
New York, New York
Contractor employees were not employees of the property owner entitled to Section 7 rights access rights of property owenr’s own employees nor nonemployees entitled to restrictive access for nonemployee union organizations under Lechmere
Contractor’s employees were much more closely aligned with property owners own employees with those of nonemployee union organizers and their rights were close
Bexar County
Only contractor employees who REGULARLY and EXCLUSIVELY work for a contractor on a property owner’s property have Section 7 access rights
Cesar’s Entertainment
No statutory right for employees to use employer-provided email for nonwork, Section 7 purposes in the typical workplace
No right to use employer-provided equipment