Essential cases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

R v Morris provides us with an example of someone doing what?

A

Assuming the rights of the owner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R v Lawrence tells us that theft can take place ____ ___ ______ __ ___ ______

A

With the consent of the victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Hinks tells that ___ ____ can be stolen

A

Voluntary theft

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Oxford v Moss

A

Tells us that information on a piece of paper cannot be stolen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Marshall: re-selling t___ is theft

A

Theft

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Kelly informs us that stealing a ___ usually isn’t theft but if it has been altered then it is indeed theft

A

A corpse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Webster

A

The rights of the owner override the rights of those in possession of the property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Davidge and Bunnett

A

Using money for a purpose other than what it was intended for is theft.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

DPP v Jones and Others

A

Breaking a borrowed item suggests you are assuming the rights of the owner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Lavender

A

Moving the owner’s property around without consent is theft.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Small

A

One is immediately regarded honest if they believed they had the right to deprive the other of the object.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Ghosh

A

Established the dishonesty test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Dawson and James

A

Declared that “force” had its ordinary meaning in court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

B and R v DPP

A

Even if the V didn’t fear violence, if the D intended them to then it still counts as robbery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Clouden

A

Force used in robbery can be indirect like in R v Bentham

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

R v Hale

A

If you steal something and then tie people up afterwards, you still used force to do so/ escape.

17
Q

R v Collins tells us what two things

A
  1. If the victim invites you in, you cannot be a trespasser.

2. “effective and substantial entry”

18
Q

R v Brown

A

“effective entry”

19
Q

R v Ryan

A

“entry”- only his head and right arm were inside.

20
Q

R v Walkington

A

People with conditional intent will be convicted.

21
Q

R v Jones and Smith

A

If you enter with intent, even where you are welcomed, you are a trespasser.

22
Q

R v Turner

A

A person can retain possession rights until a bill has been paid

23
Q

R v Velumyl

A

Returning different items of the same value is still theft

24
Q

Ivey v Genting casinos

A

Abolished the subjective element of the Ghosh test and only leaves the first, objective part.

25
Q

R v Bentham

A

Force used in robbery can be indirect

26
Q

R v Cocoran and Anderson

A

If you attempt a robbery and fail, you will still be convicted.