Equity Flashcards
Quote for squishiness
Flexibility is the hallmark of Equity
K?===> what ask for?
Specific Performance
*fact pattern may still allow to ask for injunctions
Don’t forget GOVERNING LAW?
Whether UCC or c/l governs:
√UCC governs K for sale of goods, which are movable items identified at the time of sale of the K.
√c/l rules govern K for personal services and realty.
Pardee v. Camden
list of reasons/common arguments to get into equity jurisdiction
1) Insolvency
2) Property is unique/no substantial similar property (market driven-wise)
3) Unique to individual/special meaning to π
4) No market for the property
5) Continuing harm necessitating Multiplicity Of Suits
6) Superiority of the equitable remedy
7) Inability to calculate damages
8) Damages are ineffective to vindicate (ex civil rights)
One liner for inadequacy
The remedy at law is inadequate when it is not as full, complete or efficacious as the remedy in equity
Injunctive devices
*Provisional Relief
Temp Restraining Order (TRO)
Preliminary Injunctions
Injuctive device
*Permanent Relief
Permanent Injunctions
Factors for Provisional Relief:
LIBP
1) likelihood of success on merits
2) irreparable harm or inadequacy
3) balancing of harm
4) Public Interest
* *all wieghed via a sliding scale/prove more of one–>less of other
Factors for Permanent relief:
Permanent Injunction
1) Inadequacy
2) Likelihood of success on merits
3) Balance of hardships
4) Balancing of equities
5) Public Interest
Injunctions must not disturb ____ __.
Status Quo
Status Quo
what parties were like prior to the dispute
Modern Test for Status Quo
What is the last uncontested status immediately preceding the controversy?
Traditional Test for Status Quo
If the injunction is mandatory:
√then status quo will be changed. NO TRO or prelim injunction issued
If the injunctions is prohibitory:
√then status quo will not change. TRO or prelim will issue.
patents?
(Ebay v. Mercantile Exchange)
Squishiness and discretion
Historically courts grant injunctive relief to vast majority of patent cases given the difficulty in protecting a RIGHT to EXCLUDE & USE, through monetary remedies.( Difficult when proving irreparable injury and money damages inadeq)
Want room for π to choose between $ damages or injunction
Irreparable Harm—>
preliminary (but squishy can be inadequacy too)