Equipment Flashcards
Where is FFF used?
Tomotherapy is 6MV FFF
Cyberknife uses 6MV FFF
Standard linacs can now use FFF
Why use a flattening filter?
Bremmstrahhlung distribution is strongly forward peaked in MV range, get bell shaped distribution, FF attenuates centre of beam giving flat distribution
Disadvantages of flattening filter (5)
Significant loss of dose rate due to attenuation (1/2-1/4)
Major source of head scatter increasing scatter dose to patient
Lateral spectral changes make modelling difficult
Accentuates collimator exchange effect
Acts to amplify beam steering or energy errors
Advantages of FFF (6)
Inverse planning means flat beam no longer necessary
Increase in dose rate
Reduction in extra focal scatter, less scatter to patient
Easier to model in TPS
Reduction in collimator exchange effect becomes negligable
Beam less prone to steering induced assymetries
What is varian’s approach to FFF?
Removed flattening filter and preserved beam running parameters (RF, gun, bending system parameters)
What is Elekta’s approach to FFF?
Remove FF and adjust running parameters
Dose at 10cm would reduce from 67.5 to 65%, adjusted to bring it back to 67.5
How do FFF PDDs vary in elekta and varian?
Elekta, FF and FFF very similar
Varian, FFF less penetrating
What are considerations in FFF reference dosimetry (correction factors)?
Chamber sensitivity - function of beam spectra kfff
Higher dose rate - large increase in dose per pulse and therefore ion recombination kion
Non-uniformity - shape of beam across chamber no longer negligible kvol
Chamber sensitivity kfff
With FFF, same TPR have different energy spectra, so correction is required. NPL determine a beam quality correction factor
Chamber sensitivity is a function of beam spectra, which has changed
Ion recombination kion
Factor accounts for incomplete collection of ion pairs in ion chamber. Function of charge intensity. Dose rate higher, dose per pulse higher, and therefore charge intensity. Need to correct for this.
Beam uniformity kvol
Beam profile reduces chamber response for 2 reasons: volume averaging (0.1%) and perturbation of secondary electron fluence by air cavity.
NPL recommend beam uniformity correction of 1 for NE 2611 chamber. None recommended for field chamber, incorporated into calibration factor
Substitution rather than simultaneous irradiation
Commissioning considerations FFF
No additional measurements but need to consider FFF beam when taking existing measurements: what detector is appropriate?
Ensure detector etc can measure increased dose rate
Spatial resolution, dose gradients in more directions, size vs signal/noise
Spectral sensitivity of detector, diode detectors can be more sensitive to spectral changes than chambers
Ion recombination losses - higher and can vary between chambers
Treatment times with FFF
Can drop dramatically due to dose rate. Can make breath hold more possible for some breast patients. Can use MLC, very homogenous, no need for wedge and field in field
Can be used in lung SABR and hypo-fractionated prostates to give speedier delivery
What makes a field small?
Lateral charged particle equilibrium not achieved on beam axis
Primary source is partially occluded
Detector is similar to or larger than the beam dimensions
When are small field TPS calculations used?
Stereotactic treatment
Small conformal fields
Small or narrow segments making up larger fields in IMRT or VMAT
LCPE loss
Beam radius < max range of secondary electrons
Field size for loss of LCPE is energy dependent: greater for higher energy
How does head scatter change with field size and why?
Head scatter drops sharply at small fields, amount varies with linac
Not related to FF, function of extended source occlusion
Why does source occlusion occur?
The source of photons is point where electron beam hits target, and is gaussian shaped
Beam is composite of direct and scattered radiation
The output drops significantly when direct radiation is blocked
What is typical source size?
2mm - 5mm
What effects do TPS need to model with source occlusion?
FWHM no longer correlates with field size
Needs to model source size accurately to correctly predict CAX dose