Equal Protection Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

EP application

A

how EP applies to fed, state, & local govts
* 14A EP applies directly to state/local govts
* EP applies to fed govt by incorporation through 5A DP clause (ie, EP does NOT apply directly to fed govt)

NOTE: same analysis and levels of scrutiny applies for EP analysis whether it applies through 5A or 14A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

EP analysis

A

if you see anything that could implicate EP, ask:
1. is there a discriminatory classification?
2. what level of scrutiny applies given the classification?
3. does the classification satisfy the appropriate level of scrutiny?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

is there a discriminatory classification?

A

to receive heightened scrutiny, a discriminatory classification must be proved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what level of scrutiny applies given the classification?

A
  • Strict scrutiny: suspect classifications
  • Intermediate scrutiny: quasi-suspect classification
  • Rational basis: all other alleged classification
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

provising discriminatory classification

A

three ways:
1. law discriminates on its face
2. facially-neutral law applied in a discriminatory manner
3. discriminatory motive/purpose behind law and/or application

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

law discriminates on its face

A

by its terms, the law treats classes of people differently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

facially-neutral law applied in a discriminatory manner

A

law does NOT create a classification by its terms BUT does so as applied

eg, only men are arrested under an otherwise valid law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

discriminatory motive/purpose behind law and/or application

A

Test: P must show:
* disparate impact - the law has a discriminatory impact (ie, it creates a classification), and
* discriminatory purpose - law was enacted or maintained for reasons involving discrimination

NOTE: demonstrating discriminatory impact alone is NOT enough. There MUST be some evidence of govt’s discriminatory motive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

proving discriminatory classifications burden

A

Challenger bears burden: burden is on party challenging the classification to show that it’s discriminatory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

suspect classification

A

strict scrutiny
* race
* national origin
* alienage
* right to travel
* right to vote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

quasi-suspect classification

A

intermediate scrutiny
* gender
* non-marital children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

rational basis

A
  1. alienage, but only if classification:
    - relates to self govt, and democratic process, or
    - is a congressional action concerning immigration
  2. all other - all other classifications not qualifying for strict or intermediate scrutiny receive rational basis review

eg, age, disability, wealth, economics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

race & national origin classifications (generally)

A

classifications based on race or national origin are suspect classification reviewed under strict scrutiny

ET: often arises in context of classifications benefitting minorities (affirmative action), which may be upheld

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

types of classifications benefitting minorities (affirmative action)

A
  1. numerical set-asides (quotas)
  2. admissions
  3. public school integration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

numerical set-asides (quotas)

A

to be valid: requries clear proof of persistent and readily identifiable discrimination, which cannot be based on general past wrongs
- quotas are unlikely to be upheld

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

admissions

A

b/c student body diversity may be a compelling interest, educational institutions may use race or national origin as a factor in admissions decisions, but not as a defining criterion
- universities must show that no workable race-neutral alternatives would assure the diversity sought

eg, invalid to award “points” to applicants based on race

17
Q

public school integration

A

public school systems may not assign students to schools on the basis of race to achieve integration
- generally, racial balancing is NOT a compelling state interest

18
Q

alienage classifications

A

classifications basesd on alienage (ie, citizenship status) are subject to strict scrutiny review, although certain exceptions apply

19
Q

alienage classifications exceptions

A

rational basis applies if the classification is:
1. related to self-govt and democratic process
2. a congressional law regulating immigration

20
Q

related to self-govt and democratic process

A

often arises where job applicants are denied govt employment based on their citizenship status

NOTE: areas where alienage classifications have bene upheld under rational basis review
- voting
- serving on a jury
- working as a police officer
- working as a teacher
- working as a probation officer

21
Q

a congressional law regulating immigration

A

Congress has plenary powers to regulate immigration

NOTE: undocumented aliens are NOT considered a suspect classification

22
Q

gender

A

intermediate scrutiny + “exceedingly persuasive justification”
* gender classifications receive heightened intermediate scrutiny (ie, they must substantially relate to an important govt purpose)
* Additionally: courts often require an “exceedingly persuasive justification” for the classification

23
Q

classifications discriminating against men

A

usually invalid
* BUT some have passed intermediate scrutiny (eg, statutory rape laws applying only to men, all-male military draft)

23
Q

non-marital children (legitimacy classifications)

A

Intermediate scrutiny: applies if a law grants benefits to all marital children but denies benefits to some non-marital children
* laws that deny benefits to all non-marital children while granting benefits to all marital children are unconstitutional on their face

usually arises w/ intestacy statutes

23
Q

classifications benefitting women

A
  • Classifications based on stereotypes are impermissible
  • classifications designed to remedy past discrimination or differences in opportunity will likely be upheld
24
Q

right to travel & right to vote

A

although both are fundamental rights that can be analyzed under substantive due process, the right to travel and vote often arise as classifications issues requiring EP analysis

24
Q

right to travel

A

strict scrutiny

usually arises when laws impede movement between states

includes durational residency requirements

25
Q

durational residency requirements

A

laws requiring some period of in-state residency to qualify for a state benefit

Invalid residency requirements: 1-yr residency to:
- receive welfare
- receive subsidized medical care
- vote in state elections

Valid residency requirements:
- 30-day residency to vote in state elections
- 1-yr residency to get divorce

26
Q

right to vote

A

strict scrutiny
arises w/ laws that deny some citizens the right to vote

“one person, one vote” requirement must be met for all state and local elections
- for elected bodies, voting districts must be similar in population

at large elections (constitutional)
- when all voters vote for all office holders