Equal Protection Flashcards
EP application
how EP applies to fed, state, & local govts
* 14A EP applies directly to state/local govts
* EP applies to fed govt by incorporation through 5A DP clause (ie, EP does NOT apply directly to fed govt)
NOTE: same analysis and levels of scrutiny applies for EP analysis whether it applies through 5A or 14A
EP analysis
if you see anything that could implicate EP, ask:
1. is there a discriminatory classification?
2. what level of scrutiny applies given the classification?
3. does the classification satisfy the appropriate level of scrutiny?
is there a discriminatory classification?
to receive heightened scrutiny, a discriminatory classification must be proved
what level of scrutiny applies given the classification?
- Strict scrutiny: suspect classifications
- Intermediate scrutiny: quasi-suspect classification
- Rational basis: all other alleged classification
provising discriminatory classification
three ways:
1. law discriminates on its face
2. facially-neutral law applied in a discriminatory manner
3. discriminatory motive/purpose behind law and/or application
law discriminates on its face
by its terms, the law treats classes of people differently
facially-neutral law applied in a discriminatory manner
law does NOT create a classification by its terms BUT does so as applied
eg, only men are arrested under an otherwise valid law
discriminatory motive/purpose behind law and/or application
Test: P must show:
* disparate impact - the law has a discriminatory impact (ie, it creates a classification), and
* discriminatory purpose - law was enacted or maintained for reasons involving discrimination
NOTE: demonstrating discriminatory impact alone is NOT enough. There MUST be some evidence of govt’s discriminatory motive
proving discriminatory classifications burden
Challenger bears burden: burden is on party challenging the classification to show that it’s discriminatory
suspect classification
strict scrutiny
* race
* national origin
* alienage
* right to travel
* right to vote
quasi-suspect classification
intermediate scrutiny
* gender
* non-marital children
rational basis
- alienage, but only if classification:
- relates to self govt, and democratic process, or
- is a congressional action concerning immigration - all other - all other classifications not qualifying for strict or intermediate scrutiny receive rational basis review
eg, age, disability, wealth, economics
race & national origin classifications (generally)
classifications based on race or national origin are suspect classification reviewed under strict scrutiny
ET: often arises in context of classifications benefitting minorities (affirmative action), which may be upheld
types of classifications benefitting minorities (affirmative action)
- numerical set-asides (quotas)
- admissions
- public school integration
numerical set-asides (quotas)
to be valid: requries clear proof of persistent and readily identifiable discrimination, which cannot be based on general past wrongs
- quotas are unlikely to be upheld