EQ3 Flashcards

(97 cards)

1
Q

6.7a

malthusian crisis model

A
  • went up geometircally/expenetial-1,2,4,8,16,32
  • arithmetic growth- 1,2,3,4,
  • but wouldnt reach x (where resources crosses pop) as theres checks in place to keep population down-wars, epidemics
  • boserup: GM crops to keep resources up, inovation to stop problem
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

forests

A
  • Forest covers 30% of the Earth’s land area, although only 15% are ‘natural’ primary forests – found in Canada, Alaska, Russia and the north-western Amazon basin
  • role in carbon cycle: carbon sink, sequestriation n carbon capture, carbons asborbed by photosynthesis-30.4, releases 24.5 total carbon emissions by respiration, 64 stored in below ground biomass
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

deforestation

A
  • clearance of forests for timber n land
  • land=provide grazing for livestock n produce cash crops
  • loss of over 500k ha in brazil n indonesia
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

afforestation

A
  • helping offset loss of tropical rainforest ‘services’
  • but much is taking place on what was agricultural land
  • net gain of 500k in china 1990-2015
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

deforestation in madagscar
causes

A
  • since 1950s its rainforest has been cleared at rapid rate
  • 1950 there was 11.6 mill hectares of rf land, 1985=3.8mill
  • due to pressures from gov to grow cash crop
  • 80% now gone
  • roads=significant destruction force in rf as they open it up to large machinery
  • demand rose due to growing interntaional demand for tropical hardwood, expanding pop debt repayments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

madagascar deforestation
impacts

A
  • as rf dissappears the co2 emissions increase
  • it has a major impact on size of terrestrial carbon store
  • removing forest has a colossal impact on both fluxes n stores
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

impacts of deforestation on water cycle

A
  • infiltration=decreased
  • runoff n erosion^
  • flood peaks r higher n lag time=shorter
  • ^ discharge leads to flooding
  • ^ eroded material is carried in river- as bed load and silt n clay in suspension
  • annual rainfall=reduced n seasonality of rainfall=^
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

impacts of deforestation on soil health

A
  • raindrop impact washes fine particles of clay n humus away
  • coarser n heavy sands r left behind
  • co2=released from decaying woody materials
  • biomass is lost due to reduced plant growth/photosyenthesis
  • rapid soil erosion leads to loss of nutrients
  • ^ leaching (loss of nutrients from soil by infiltration) means minerals=lost
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Impacts of deforestation on atmosphere

A
  • turbulance=^ as heated ground induces convectional air currents
  • oxygen content is reduced n transpiration rates=lower
  • less shading leads to ^ direct sunlight reaching forest floor
  • reduced evapotranspiration makes it less humid
  • air=dryer
  • evapotranspiration rates from resultant grasslands r about 1/3 of tropical rf
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Impacts of deforestation
on biosphere

A
  • evaporation from veg is less
  • less absorption of co2 means decreased carbon store
  • species diversity= decreased (eg less resisident forest plants die off)
  • ecosystem services r decreased
  • decrease in habitants means fewer animal species survive
  • biomass is lost, bc of less plant growth/photosynethesis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

reorestation

A
  • an establishment of a forest cover in a colation where the forests have been cleared in recent past, usuallly to repurpose the land for activities like agriculture or mining
  • cons: decreade biodoversity, ^ soil erosion n loss of water resources if done improperly
  • pros: slows flooding impacts-dispers water
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Grassland conversion

A
  • temperate n tropical grasslands have become heavily exploited by agriculture
  • both have suffered as result of over exploitation
  • simple act of ploughing leads to an immdeiate loss of both co2 n moisture, as well as change in runoff characterstics
  • theres 3 main types of grassland conversion that cover approximately 26% of global land area.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

savannah grass land

A
  • eg sahel africa
  • wetland
  • tropical
  • 2 seaons wet n dry
  • wild fires
  • baobab trees w thick curvy bark that resists fires
  • bumoda grass
  • humans use it for food n wood production
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

piraries

A
  • eg n america
  • flat, fertile lands dominated by grasses.
  • hold soil firmly in place=minimal erosion
  • grass roots=good at reaching water more than a meter deep n can live v long
  • low rain n thin soils
  • strong winds
  • 80 species of animals n 300 of birds
  • wind n soil erosion remove grass=dust storms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

steppe grasslands

A
  • eg eurasian steppe, us great plains
  • dry w temperate climate
  • drastic seasonal changes
  • cold winters n hot summers w little rainfall during year
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

benefits of natural grasslands

A
  • trap moisture n food water
  • absorbs toxins from soil
  • provide cover for dry soils
  • maintain natural habitats
  • act as carbon sink- absorb co2 n release o2 all year round=lung effect
  • act as terrestial carbon store
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

disadvantages of converting grasslands to grow biofuel crops

A
  • initial removal releases co2
  • annual ploughing enables soil bac to release co2
  • they need carbon based nitrogen fertiliser n chemical pesticides so produce net ^ of co2 emisions
  • theyre heavy consumers of water=need irrigation which has big impact on aquifers
  • cultivated soils r liable to erosion by runoff n wind
  • natural habitats r reduced
  • the lung effect is reduced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

urbanisation

A
  • biggest land use conversion
  • big demand for space needed to accomadate rising urban pop n widening of economic activities
  • biggest disrputive impact on carbon n water cycles
  • towns n cities=focal points of both GHG emissions n intense water demand
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

6.7b

oceans role in carbon cycle

A
  • carbon sequestration: biological carbon pump-fragile system, phytoplankton takes up C, if change in temp n acidicty it might change
  • absorbs 30% of co2 produced by human activities since 1800
  • carbon carbonic
  • carbon sink
  • sedimentation- animal/plant shells fall of n sink n form rocks- dead remains of skeletons lead to limestone
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

ocean acidification

A
  • decrease in alkalinity/ph of oceans
  • cause by uptake of co2
  • occurs bc oceans n carbon sinks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

carbon sinks

A

absorbs more carbon from the atmosphere than it releases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

changes in ocean acidification

A
  • in 19th century=8.2 now 8.1(2015)
  • seem small but theres been large change in ph of surface waters
  • 2100 projected: ^ concentration of atmospheric co2, fewer n smaller marine calcilifiers, fewer carbonate ions, 7.8,
  • vulnerable organisms: clams, plankton, finfish, lobsters
  • coral reefs - they stop growing once ph less than 7.8
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

critical threshold

A
  • point which damage is irreversible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

ecosystem resilience

A
  • leevl of distrubance that ecosystems can cope w/while keeping og state
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
# 6.7c how worlds forests as carbon stores=challeneged
1. deforestation 2. poleward shift of climate belts 3. increasing drought
26
el nino n la nina
- as well as rising temps scientists have blamed a spike in el nino effect for dramtic impacts experienced in recent years - ***conditions***: - trade winds=weaker allowing warm surface water along equator to pile up along coast of s.usa then move cali n chile - rain clouds form over this warm part of ocean - clouds move inland n dump ^ rain on usa - meanwhile indonesia n australia suffer droughts
27
# case study amazon drought
- drought of 2014-2015 - rivers dried n fish died - drier forests gets less carbon it can store - forest absorbs about 1.5bn tonnes of Co2 - in 2005 drought it released 5bn tonnes of c - 2010-released 8bn tonnes - when trees die it shifts balance n not a sink anymore - it pumps 20bn tonnes of water into atmosphere daily - its uniform humidity lowers atmospheric pressure allowing mositure from atlantic to reach across continent - droughts mean its sequestering less co2 from atmosphere= ^ GHG effect - drought= plays a dimished role in hydrological cycle
28
# 6.8a ecosystem services assesment
1. ecosystem services: supporting - provisioing, cultural, regulating 1. constituents of well being - security, basic material for good life, health, social relations - freedoms of choices n action
29
forest lost impacts on wellbeing
- the un has described worlds forests as 'fundamental' to human well being n survival - over 1.6bn ppl depend on forests n over 90% of these=poorest in society - forests, like other ecosystems r essential due to services they provide as well as being source of around 80% of global biodiversity
30
forests r important for:
- sequestering carbon dioxide from the atmosphere - storing carbon - transferring moisture from the soil back into the atmosphere by evapotranspiration
31
kuznets curve
- as they reach higher leevls of development n wealth socities reach a tipping point when costs of resource exploitation become fully realised n =set against benefits of resource conservation n protection 1. **uk pre industrial revolution, remote amazonia, indonesia pre 1970s-** low income, low enviromental degradtion 2. **indonesia today, china 20th century-** ^ in income, large ^ in enviromental degradation, rising income worsens enviromental impacts 3. **china today-** shallower gradient, almost at peak enviromental degradtion, middle level income 4. **uk today-** (post industrial service economy) rising income reduces enviromental impact
32
# case study indonesia palm oil plantations
- palm oil fruit used in many food products (cheapest veg oil on market) - **borneo** rainforest=souirce of **1/2** worlds PO - its protected under **indonesian law n un enviromental programme**=identified as **orangutangs** natural habitat (last of asia) - £**5bn** a year frim food n biofuel - protected forest=being logged eg by **dutu palma group** - estimate **88**% all timber logged there=***illegal*** - area double size of wales=earmarked for future dev - **40**% orangutangs habitat=destroyed last 2 decades- **50,000** died in recent years- pop reduced by **50**% - deforestation causes wildfires
33
# case study deforestation coca plantations, peru
- ^ threat to indigenous ppl n their hunting grounds, due to reduction to area n biodiversity - 90% used for cocaine production of red zone east peru=cause deforestation - peru, bolivis n columbia=worlds major producers of coca
34
# 6.8b rising temps resulting from GHG emissions r ^ both evaporation rates n amount of water vapour. This in turn, is impacting on:
* precipitation patterns- ^ 0.8mm daily over ocean, reduce in brazil RF, more droughts in some places more intense rain in others, * river regimes- - drainage basin stores - the cryosphere
35
ice loss and arctic albedo
- earths cryosphere has been affected by GW - over last 20yrs the antarctic n greenland ice sheets had negative mass balance n in N hemisphere spring snow cover=continued to decrease in extent n thickness - melting of permafrost - carbon uptake by terrestrial plants=^ bc lengthening growing season - loss of albedo as ice once covered land surface=now tundra n then taiga - sunlight previsouly reflected of ice now absorbed=^GW - sea ice regulates evaporation n rain
36
climatic barometer
- measure atmospheric pressure - **arctic**=early warning system for rest of planet, acting as a barometer for climate health of the planet
37
increase temp has implications on rain patterns | eg of yukon
- lead to ^ evaporation n atmospheric water vapour - across yukon, winter rain ^ between 1950 n 1998 - but greater proportion fell as spring rain n less as snow than before - climate scientists agree annual precipitation will ^ by 5% n 20% by 2100
38
increase temp has implications on river regimes | eg of yukon
- snowmelt now begins earlier in yukon n snow cover=decreasing - alters RR bringing earlier peak flows to most river basins - between 1958 n 2008-total ice area shrank by 22% n as glaciers recede streamflow=decreasing-despite initial ^ in meltwater
39
increase temp has implications on water stores | eg of yukon
- since 2000, inflows to yukon river have ^ by 39% due to ^ temp n rain - as permafrost thaws, CC could ^ amount of groundwater - CC is leading to thawing of PF- so water penetrates deeper into soil, instead of forming surface runoff
40
positive impacts on human wellbeing
- warming climate=opening up previously ice-bound wilderness to tourism - the exploitation of mineral resoiurces, mainly arctic oil=become more feasible
41
negative impacts on human wellbeing
- its disrupting n annihilating tradtional ways of life - eg for fishing n hunting of inuits in N usa n the sami reindeer herders of N eurasia
42
the albedo effect
- the ability of surfaces to reflect sunlight - less ice sheets=less white surfaces=less reflected=more absorbed=climate warming - light surfaces=high albedo
43
# 6.8c decline in ocean health
- caused by acidification n bleaching cause changes to marine food webs - fish n crustacean stocks r declining n changing their distrubutuions - changes=mainly felt by developing countries - fishing supports 500 million ppl-90%=in developing nations - many depend on seafood for income as well as food - seafood=dietary prefence of wealthier countries eg iceland n japan - aquaculture=^, but productivity is being affected by declining PH values n rising temps
44
protecting mangroves
- found in africa,australia,asia n america - benefits: protect against erosion, collect nutrient rich sediments, provide protection n shelter against extreme weather n tsunamis by absorbing n dispursting waves, provide nurseries for fish away from predators - half global MF=lost since 1950-aquaculture=cause of over 25% of this loss
45
coral bleaching
- CR shelter 25% of marine species - CB=caused by ocean acidification n warming oceans -
46
ecological impacts of coral bleaching
- BC likely to have- reduced growth rates, decreased capacity, ^ susceptibility n elavted mortality rates - declines in genetic n species diversity may occur when corals die - chnages in coral community happen when more susceptible species=killed - changes affect species that depend on them eg fish need for food, recruitment habitat n shelter
47
socioeconomic impacts of coral bleeching
- less able to provide ecosystem services. eg less productive n not able to sustain accretion rates necessary to ensure reefs continue to provide shoreline protection services - may lose aethestic appeal=fundamental for reef tourism=can threaten livelihood of local communities - lead to significant coral mortality=drive large shifts in fish communities.= cause reduce fish catches=impact food supply n economcy - cultural values of many tropical island communities (eg religous sites n traditional uses of marine resources) depend on healthy coral reef ecosystems - source of pharmaceutical compounds n medical resources eg drugs for cancer, heart disease etc - affcet human communities: relied on for food, income n enjoyment- over 100 million dpeend on them for survival -
48
coral bleaching n degradation costs
- costs from $20bn (modertae cb) to $84bn (severe) in net present value (over a 50 yr time horizon) - losses to tourism=highest ($10bn-40bn), followed by fisheries ($7-23bn) n biodiversity ($6-22bn)
49
# 6.9a uncertainity about the future
- indication global surface temps change by end of 21st century is likely to exceed 1.5'c relative to 1850 - a threshold of 2'c is regarded as gateway to dangerously warming
50
# anthropogenic factors uncertainity of economic
- after finanicla crisis of 2007-8, there was worry rising co2 emissions would follow recovery of global gdp - but after rising 4% per year since 2000, the rate of emissions growth fell to 1% by 2012-13 n 0.5% by 2014 - but total carbon emissions still reached new record
51
# anthropogenic factors energy sources
- energy consumption grew 2% between 2008-14 - but renewablen sources made up 2/3 of ^ in electiricty production in 2015
52
# anthropogenic factors population change
- ^ affluence in emerging economies means potential extra billion consumers by 2050-w/spending power equal to usa - changing diets n ^ mobility mean ^ emissions
53
# natural factors peatlands
- peat=accumulated of partly decayed veg n stores large amounts of C bc of low rate of C breakdown (decomposition) in cold waterlogged soils - warming cause peat to dry out as water tables fall=^ rate of decomposition - warming of 4'c causes 40% loss of soil organic c from shallow peat n 86% from deep peat - peatlands tend to emit C in form of methane=^ concentration of GHG
54
# natural factors permafrost
- when it melts it releseases trapped C as co2 n methane - ^ atmospheric GHG concentration n leading to ^ temps n melting
55
# natural factors oceans
- act as carbon sinks n store heat - take decades to respond to changes in GHG concerntrations - reposnse to ^ levels og ghg n ^ temps will continue to affect global climate for possibly hundreds of years
56
# natural factors forests
- act as carbon sink n store heat - human factors also play role - although amount of forested land=^ in HIC, the overall global total=falling-mainly in tropics
57
positive feedback
- amplifies it - Earth system models suggest that oceans will absorb more co2 from the atmosphere, but a concern is what happens when the ocean reaches saturation point. - Theres uncertainty about terrestrial ecosystems c uptake bc of vulnerability to human activities, fire n respiration changes=would return c to atmosphere (**positive feedback**). - Other positive feedbacks incl reduced albedo as snow and ice melt, n methane releases.
58
negative feedback
- dampens og process - dempeciry effect 1. ^ cloud cover due to higher evaporation rates which would reflect solar energy back into space 2. ^ plant growth as result of ^ co2 concentrations 3. reduced co2 concentrations in atmosphere slowing the rate of warming
59
arctic amplification
- warming 2x then rest of world - oceans=warmer - diff between arctic (ocean surronded by land=less land ice, less sea ice) - antarctica (land surronded by oceans=less laand ice, more sea ice ) - 3 parts-albedo affect, permafrost melting, ocean currents change - ocean current chnage lead sto change in warm n cold currents
60
tipping points
- critical threshold - particular moment in time, small change in global climate system can transform relatively stable system into very diff state - 2 main capable of creating tipping point: forest die back, changes to thermohaline circulation
61
# tipping point forest die back
- rainfall in amazon basin=recycled from moisture w/in forest - if rf=subject to dorught trees die back - tipping point could be reached-level of die back stops recycling og moisture w/in rf=more die back - boreal forest ecosystem- hot,dry summers lead to water stress n cause trees to die - tipping point=reached where trees no longer absorob enough co2 from atmosphere=lead to ^ levels of GHG
62
# tipping point changes to thermohaline circulation
- cold,deep water in N atlantic forms part of THC - keep the 'conveyor belt' of warm water heading from trpoic towards britain, heavy, salty water must sink in N - but ,melting of N ice sheets releases sig quantities of freshwater into ocean=lighter n less salty=block n slow conveyor belt - as ice sheets melt, ocean circulation is susceptible to critical TP
63
# 6.9b adaption startergies
adopt new ways of doing things in order to live w likely outcomes of climate change
64
# AS water conservation and management expl n example
- range of stratergies to manage limited supplies of freshwater: 1. smart irrigation 2. recycling sewage water for agricultural use 3. reducing agricultural consumption n importing water in food as virtual water 4. adopting stringent conservation techs 5. managing demand by charging 'real value' prices for water to reflect the cost of supply n of ecosystem management - eg israel
65
# as pros of water conservation and management
- Fewer resources used, less groundwater abstraction - Attitudinal change operates on a long-term basis: use more grey (recycled) water - easy to maintain - less water bills - used for irrigation - controls fires - less floods - soil erosion
66
cons of Water Conservation and Management
- Efficiency and conservation cannot match increased demands for water - Changing cultural habits of a large water footprint needs promotion and enforcement by governments, e.g. smart meters - rainfall= unpredictable - initial costs - maintance
67
Resilient Agricultural Systems expl n egs
- involves growing crops using a no-tilling (ploughing) approach - uses fewer fertilisers, retains stubble n grows cover crops - eg usa, syria, iraq - eg ethopia: water spreading weirs built in dry valleys, help slow down floods n spread water, theyve built around 50 since 2013-3500 ha=under rehabilitation helps 50,000 ppl have access to water n food for 6 months per year despite cc theres a chance to become food-secure
68
pros of Resilient Agricultural Systems
- Higher-tech, drought-tolerant species help resistance to climate change and increase in diseases - Low-tech measures n better practices generate healthier soils n may help co2 sequestration n water storage: selective irrigation, mulching, cover crops, crop rotation, reduced ploughing, agroforestry. - More 'indoor' intensive farming - income for farmers - protection of open spaces
69
cons of Resilient Agricultural Systems
- More expensive technology, seeds and breeds unavailable to poor subsistence farmers without aid - High energy costs from indoor and intensive farming - Genetic modification is still debated, but frequently used to crease resistant strains, e.g. rice and soya - Growing food insecurity in many places adds pressure to find 'quick fixes'
70
land use planning n flood risk management expl n egs
- diff stratergies can be used to adapt cc - incl: land use zoning (use in flood plan where dev on flood plauns=limited to low impact things like playing fields n parks) - inifltration occurs naturally n surface runoff=reduced along w/risk of wider flooding - eg bangladesh
71
pros of land us eplanning
- low cost approach - Soft management: land-use zoning, building restrictions in vulnerable flood plains and low-lying coasts - Enforcing strict runoff controls and soakaways
72
cons of land use planning
- Public antipathy - Abandoning high-risk areas and land-use resettling is often unfeasible, as in megacities such as Dhaka, Bangladesh or Tokyo-Yokohama - A political 'hot potato' - Needs strong governance, enforcement and compensation
73
flood risk management
74
pros of flood risk management
* Hard-management traditionally used: localised flood defences, river dredging - Simple changes can reduce flood risk, e.g. permeable tarmac - Reduced deforestation and more afforestation upstream to absorb water and reduce downstream flood risk
75
costs of Flood-Risk Management
- Debate over funding sources, especially in times of economic austerity - Land owners may demand compensation for afforestation or 'sacrificial land' kept for flooding - Constant maintenance is needed in hard management, - e.g. dredging; lapses of management can increase risk - Ingrained culture of 'techno-centric fixes': a disbelief that technology cannot overcome natural processes
76
solar radiation management
- form of climate engineering-aims to reflect solar rays n so reduce global warming - eg pumping sulphur aerosls into upper atmosphere, cloud brightening, space based reflectors
77
pros of solar radiation management
- deployed v quick - offset some of effects of ghg emmisions - geoengineering nvolves ideas and plans to deliberately intervene in the climate system to counteract global warming - proposal =use orbiting satellites to reflect some inward radiation back into space, rather like a giant sunshade - could cool Earth w/in months n be relatively cheap compared w mitigation
78
costs of Solar Radiation Management
- ​Untried and untested - Would reduce but not eliminate the worst effects of GHGs: for example, it would not alter acidification - Involves tinkering with a very complex system, which might have unintended consequences or externalities - Would need to continue geoengineering for decades or centuries as there would be a rapid adjustment in the climate system if SRM stopped suddenly
79
# 6.9c mitigation stratergies
- rebalance the carbon cycle n reduce any impacts of climate change
80
carbon taxation
- a fee/cost paid by users of fossil fuels, which is directly link to levels of co2 emissions that fuel the fuel produces - wont gaurentee reduction in level of co2 - but idea is it sends a message to change to form of less emission producing energy - uks carbon price flood=tax on fossil fuels used to generate electricity n came into effect **2013**
81
pros of carbon taxation
- reduce carbon emissions n pollution - makes polluters pay for emissions thye make - generates gov revenue - encourages switch to renewables - easy to implement
82
cons of carbon taxation
- ^ consumer costs - unequal to those w low income - polluters may relocate production to countries w no tax - hard to monitor n adminstor - not fool proof
83
energy efficiency
- use less energy to do same task - less energy system requires to produce desired output=^ energy efficiency - eg 2014 germeny study identified it as most energy effecient country. - study rasnked worlds 16 major economies - usa=13th - germanys policy: residential n commerical buildings to reduce energy consumption by 25%, loans to renovate older energy consuming propertiues, subsides to improve effecincies in manufacturing - its economy has grown n still ^ effeciency n reducing neg enviromental impacts of energy uyse
84
pros of energy effeicceny
- reduces ghg emissions - create energy sustainable jobs - global improvements in energy efficiency have been done
85
renewable switching
- need renewables thats cheap - solar, wind, wave etc - things in the way: effeciency n energy transporation - eg solar needs constant sun like the desert but those r ages away from desnely populated regions - biofuels etc also have limits like in location
86
eg of renewable switching
- sweden leeds in switch8ng - oil produced 75% of its energy 1970-now 20% - 83% of its electricty is produced by nuclear n hydroecletric power - combined heat n power plants produced 10% (mainly biofuels) - around 7% comes from wind
87
pros n cons of renewable switching
- pros: low carbon emissions, its infinite - cons: only provides 13% of needs, infrastructure to transport energy=hardn location n other factors
88
afforestation n reforestation
- restore forests by replanting trees in damaged areas - reasons: restore in places destroyed by wildfires, replant former mining n agricultural lands n replenish areas logged for timber - lots of planning
89
canada n sweden n south korea on aforestation n deforestation
- canada n sweden=-best - south korea= forest degradation ^ in ww2 n korean war - illegal logging, use of firewood n expansion of slash n burn agriculture added to its destruction - gov included forest rehabilitaion projects as part of its economic dev plans - between 1961 n 1995 area of forested land in SK rose from 4 to 6.3mill ha n by 2008 11bn trees had been planted - about 2/3 of sk=forested
90
pros n cons of afforestation n reforestation
- restoration of degraded enviroments - prevention of soil erosion - provision of forest sinks n stores of co2
91
carbon capture n storage
- upgrader turns heavy oil (bitumen) into synethic crude- refined into everyday products like gasoline n jet fuel - absorbs co2 n pressured top turn into liquid
92
carbon capture n storage egs
- in 2014, canada boundary dam became worlds first commercial carbon capture coal fired power plant - aims to cuyt emissions by 90% by trapping it undergounrd before it can reach atmosphere - saskatchewans state owned electricty provider expects to reduce ghg emissions by about 1 mn tonnes a year, equivalent of 250,000 cars
93
pros n cons of carbon capture n storage
- pros: reduce carbon relocate into atmopshere - cons: ^ costs, energy intensifies, enviromental risks - limited scale
94
key international aggreements
1. 1 world climate conference 1979 2. kyoto protecal cop3 japan-1997 3. op15 2009- limit temp rise no go over 2'c 4. 21st unfcc cop in paris 2015- worlds first universally legally binding global climate deal- 195 countries limit ^ to 1.5'c, indivual nation plans to reduce emissions, strengthen ability to adapt n resilient in dealing w impacts of cc, provide adpation support for devolping countries, continue to support intitiaives in developing counties aimed at reducing emissions
95
actions n attitudes: govs
- govs at diff levels of dev may disagree - some fear curbing emissions universally may hamper economic growth for developing countries - n as theyre beingh unfairly penalised now, given damage has alr been done by existing inductsrialsed nations - theyre wary of losing voters by introducing energy levies/taxes to cut energy consumption
96
actions n attitudes: tncs
- globalisation has helped them to develop trading advanatges n access to global markets - reduced ghg emissions could ^ their manufacturing costs - but beneifts in promoting green consumer products
97
actions n attitudes: people
- countries at risk from ^ SL view cc as more yrganet than others - aus- 1 of worlds ^ per capita energy consumers-theres growing resistance to policies that would put their coal miners out of work or ^ fuel costs