EPPP (AATBS, 2013) - Ethics Flashcards
Animals in Research
Standard 8.09 requires psychologists to
- “acquire, care for, use, and dispose of animals in compliance with current federal, state, and local laws and regulations, and with professional standards” and
- to “make reasonable efforts to minimize the discomfort, infection, illness, and pain of animal subjects.”
Competence
Standard 2.01 requires psychologists to
“provide services, teach, and conduct research with populations and in areas only within the boundaries of their competence, based on their education, training, supervised experience, consultation, study, or professional experience.”
Ethical Violations by Colleagues
Standard 1.04 encourages psychologists to handle ethical violations informally by discussing the matter with the offender when an “informal resolution appears appropriate”;
Standard 1.05 states that psychologists make a formal report to the Ethics Committee, state licensing board, or other appropriate authority when the problem involves “substantial harm” and is not appropriate for an informal resolution or has not been resolved satisfactorily by an attempt at an informal resolution.
Note that these Standards also require that, before psychologists take any action, they must consider the issue of client confidentiality, which always takes precedence over the need to educate or punish an offending psychologist.
Informed Consent for Research
Standard 8.02 states
“(a) When obtaining informed consent as required in Standard 3.10, Informed Consent, psychologists inform participants about
- the purpose of the research, expected duration, and procedures;
- their right to decline to participate and to withdraw from the research once participation has begun;
- the foreseeable consequences of declining or withdrawing;
- reasonably foreseeable factors that may be expected to influence their willingness to participate such as potential risks, discomfort, or adverse effects;
- any prospective research benefits; limits of confidentiality;
- incentives for participation;
- and whom to contact for questions about the research and research participants’ rights.”
Privilege and Holder of the Privilege
Privilege is a legal concept that protects a client’s confidentiality in the context of legal proceedings. Most jurisdictions now have laws that establish privilege for communications between licensed mental health practitioners and their clients.
The client is ordinarily the “holder of the privilege,” but a psychologist can assert the privilege on behalf of a client, and there are exceptions to privilege that are legally defined.
Sexual Misconduct (By Therapists)
The data on sexual misconduct has consistently shown that male therapists engage in sexual and other dual relationships with clients much more often than female therapists. The data also show that male therapists who engage in sexual misconduct are usually older than the female clients they become involved with, with the average therapist being between 42 and 44 and the client being between 30 and 33.
No consistent relationship has been found between risk for sexual misconduct and theoretical orientation, professional experience, or education (Pope et al., 1993).
Barter
Standard 6.05 states that “Psychologists may barter only if it is not clinically contraindicated, and the resulting arrangement is not exploitative.”
Competence to Stand Trial
Laws related to competence to stand trial also vary, but all were derived from the standard set forth in Dusky v. United States (1960), which defines a defendant as incompetent if, as the result of mental defect or illness, the defendant lacks “sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding, and … a rational as well as a factual understanding of the proceedings against him” (p. 171).
Fact and Expert Witness
A fact witness is a person “who testifies as to what he/she has seen, heard, or otherwise observed regarding a circumstance, event of occurrence as it actually took place… Fact witnesses are generally not allowed to offer opinion, address issues that they do not have personal knowledge of or respond to hypothetical situations” (APA, 1998, p. 7).
An expert witness is a person “who by reason of education or specialized experience possesses superior knowledge respecting a subject about which persons having no particular training are incapable of forming an accurate opinion or deducing correct conclusions” (Nolan and Nolan-Haley, 1990, p. 578). A person who has been qualified as an expert witness by the court will be allowed to offer opinions and provide testimony based on hypothetical scenarios.
Informed Consent for Therapy
Standard 10.01 states “(a) When obtaining informed consent to therapy as required in Standard 3.10, Informed Consent, psychologists inform clients/patients as early as is feasible in the therapeutic relationship about the nature and anticipated course of therapy, fees, involvement of third parties, and limits of confidentiality and provide sufficient opportunity for the client/patient to ask questions and receive answers.”
Pro Bono Services
Although the term pro bono is not used in the Ethics Code, General Principle B (Fidelity and Responsibility) states that “psychologists strive to contribute a portion of their professional time for little or no compensation or personal advantage.”
Because pro bono services are addressed in the Ethics Code’s aspirational General Principles rather than in its mandatory Ethical Standards, this means that pro bono services are recommended by the Code but are not required.
Sexual Relations with Students and Supervisees
Standard 7.07 states “Psychologists do not engage in sexual relationships with students or supervises who are in their department, agency, or training center or over whom psychologists have or are likely to have evaluative authority.”
Client Testimonials
Standard 5.05 states that “Psychologists do not solicit testimonials from current therapy clients/patients or other persons who because of their particular circumstances are vulnerable to undue influence.”
Consultation
Standard 4.06 states that “When consulting with colleagues, psychologists do not disclose confidential information that reasonably could lead to the identification of a client/patient, research participant, or other person or organization with whom they have a confidential relationship unless they have obtained the prior consent of the person or organization or the disclosure cannot be avoided, and they disclose information only to the extent necessary to achieve the purposes of the consultation.”
Guidelines for Child Custody Evaluations in Divorce Proceedings
The Guidelines states that the “child’s interests and well-being are paramount” in custody evaluations and that psychologists “generally avoid conducting a child custody evaluation in a case in which the psychologist served in a therapeutic role for the child or his or her immediate family.”
Malpractice
For a client or other person to bring a claim of malpractice against a psychologist, four conditions must be met:
- The psychologist must have had a professional relationship with the person, which established a legal duty of care.
- There must be a demonstrable standard of care that the psychologist has breached.
- The person suffered harm or injury.
- The psychologist’s breach of duty within the context of the standard of care was the proximate cause of there person’s harm or injury.
Referral Fees
Standard 6.07 states “When psychologists pay, receive payment from, or divide fees with another professional, other than in an employer-employee relationship, the payment to each is based on the services provided (clinical, consultative, administrative, or other) and is not based on the referral itself.”
Tarasoff Decision
The original Tarasoff decision established a “duty to warn” an intended victim of a therapy client; however, in a rehearing of the case, this was changed to a “duty to protect” the intended victim by warning him/her, notifying the police, or taking other steps.
Client Welfare
Standard 3.04 addresses client welfare in a general way and states that psychologists “take reasonable steps” to avoid and minimize harm to clients, students, research participants and others with whom they work.