Epidemiology/Biostatistics I Flashcards

1
Q

cross sectional study

A

collect data from group of people

  • assess frequency of disease
  • at particular point in time

asks what is happening?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

case control study

A

retrospective

compare group with disease to group without

look for prior exposure

ask what happened?

odd ratio - patient with COPD had higher odds of smoking history than those without COPD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

cohort study

A

compare group with give exposure or risk fx to group without exposure

look to see if exposure increased likelihood of disease

relative risk - smoker had higher risk of developing COPD than nonsmoker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

twin concordance study

A

compare frequency with which both monozygotic twins or both dizoygotics developed disease

nature vs. nurture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

adoption study

A

compare siblings raised biological vs. adoptive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

clinical trial

A

experiment with humans

therapeutic benefit of 2 or more treatments, or of treatment and placebo

better study - if random, controlled, double blinded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

triple blinded

A

involves researching doing study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

phases of drug trials

A

phase 1 - safety - toxicity, PK, PD

phase 2 - does it work - small number patients with disease of interest

phase 3 - large number of patients - good or better - compared to current standard of care

phase 4 - can it stay - rare and long term adverse affects - postmarketing surveillance of patient after tx approved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

sensitivity

A

true positive

TP / all with disease

screening test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

specificity

A

true negative

TN / all without disease

confirmatory test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

positive predictive value

A

TP / all positives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

negative predictive value

A

TN / all negatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

incidence

A

number new cases during time period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

prevalence

A

number of cases at certain time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

short duration disease

A

incidence kind of equals prevalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

odds ration

A

case control study

odd group with disease exposed to risk factor
-divided by odds that group without disease was exposed

17
Q

relative risk

A

cohort study

risk developing disease in exposed group
-divided by risk in unexposed group

18
Q

attributable risk

A

difference in risk between exposed and unexposed group

proportion of disease occurences that are attributable to exposure

19
Q

relative risk reduction

A

proportion of risk reduction attributable to intervention compared to control

20
Q

absolute relative risk

A

difference in risk attributable to intervention as compared to control

21
Q

number needed to treat

A

number of patient need to be treated for 1 patient to benefit

22
Q

number needed to harm

A

number of patient needed to exposed to risk fx for 1 patient to be harmed

23
Q

precision

A

consistent - all values close together

reliability

not close to the bulls eye but close together

24
Q

accuracy

A

validity

absence of systematic error

close to actual measurement - bulls eye

25
selection bias
error assigning subject to group | -unrepresentative sample
26
berkson bias
study from hospital - people less healthy
27
healthy worker effect
study population healthier then general population
28
non-response bias
participant differ from non-responders
29
recall bias
awareness of disorder alter recall by subject patient with disease recall exposure after learning similar cases
30
measurement bias
info gathered in a way that distorts it miscalibrated scale - overstate weight of subject
31
procedure bias
subject in different group not treated same
32
observe-expectancy bias
researcher belief in tx changes outcome of tx
33
confounding bias
factor is related to both exposure and outcome, but not causal pathway factor distorts or confuses effect of exposure on outcome
34
lead time bias
early detection confused with increased survival