Epidemiology/Biostatistics I Flashcards
cross sectional study
collect data from group of people
- assess frequency of disease
- at particular point in time
asks what is happening?
case control study
retrospective
compare group with disease to group without
look for prior exposure
ask what happened?
odd ratio - patient with COPD had higher odds of smoking history than those without COPD
cohort study
compare group with give exposure or risk fx to group without exposure
look to see if exposure increased likelihood of disease
relative risk - smoker had higher risk of developing COPD than nonsmoker
twin concordance study
compare frequency with which both monozygotic twins or both dizoygotics developed disease
nature vs. nurture
adoption study
compare siblings raised biological vs. adoptive
clinical trial
experiment with humans
therapeutic benefit of 2 or more treatments, or of treatment and placebo
better study - if random, controlled, double blinded
triple blinded
involves researching doing study
phases of drug trials
phase 1 - safety - toxicity, PK, PD
phase 2 - does it work - small number patients with disease of interest
phase 3 - large number of patients - good or better - compared to current standard of care
phase 4 - can it stay - rare and long term adverse affects - postmarketing surveillance of patient after tx approved
sensitivity
true positive
TP / all with disease
screening test
specificity
true negative
TN / all without disease
confirmatory test
positive predictive value
TP / all positives
negative predictive value
TN / all negatives
incidence
number new cases during time period
prevalence
number of cases at certain time
short duration disease
incidence kind of equals prevalence
odds ration
case control study
odd group with disease exposed to risk factor
-divided by odds that group without disease was exposed
relative risk
cohort study
risk developing disease in exposed group
-divided by risk in unexposed group
attributable risk
difference in risk between exposed and unexposed group
proportion of disease occurences that are attributable to exposure
relative risk reduction
proportion of risk reduction attributable to intervention compared to control
absolute relative risk
difference in risk attributable to intervention as compared to control
number needed to treat
number of patient need to be treated for 1 patient to benefit
number needed to harm
number of patient needed to exposed to risk fx for 1 patient to be harmed
precision
consistent - all values close together
reliability
not close to the bulls eye but close together
accuracy
validity
absence of systematic error
close to actual measurement - bulls eye