Epidemiological Study Design 1 Flashcards
What is a cross sectional study
type of observational study that analyses data from a population, or a representative subset, at a specific point in time
Strengths of a cross sectional study
quick
relatively cheap and simple
Weaknesses of a cross sectional study
not useful for rare exposures or diseases
cannot assess causation as don’t know whether outcome or exposure came first
What are cohort studies?
define groups on exposure
type of longitudinal study
perform cross-sections at intervals of time, looking for outcome
Strengths of cohort studies
know of exposure before disease (outcome), therefore measurement of exposure not likely to be biased by disease
look at multiple outcomes easily
direct assessment of incidence
good for rare exposures
Weaknesses of cohort studies
poor design for rare outcomes
slow and expensive, have to wait for outcomes
attrition
selection bias if exposed and unexposed not representative
Retrospective cohort studies
cohort study using data gathered in the past for exposure and outcome
allows cohort studies to be conducted more quickly and cheaply
What are case control studies?
observational study in which two existing groups differing in outcome are identified and compared on the basis of some supposed causal attribute
Strengths of case control studies
efficient for rare outcomes/diseases with long latency between exposure and disease
cheap and quick
easy to study multiple exposures
good for populations where follow up is difficult
Weaknessed of case control studies
prone to bias
can study only one outcome
poor for studying rare exposures
cannot usually allow direct calculation of incidence rates
Ecological studies
observational study where data is analysed at the population or group level, rather than individual level
often used to measure prevalence and incidence of disease, particularly when disease is rare
Strengths of ecological studies
quick and cheap
generate hypotheses to examine at individual level
Weaknesses of ecological studies
different areas may not have same ascertaianment or recording of disease
differences in measurement of exposure
relationships found at population level may not hold true at an individual level