EOS 365 Flashcards
where did the atmosphere come from
volcanic outgassing ~4.6bya
surface temperature on earth 4.6bya
80-100ºC
atmospheric composition 4.6bya
H2O 85%
CO2 10%
N2, S, SO2, H2S 5%
volcanism slowed down
3.8bya
less volcanism– lower CO2— cooling— condensation– precipitation
oxygenic photosynthesis
3.5-2.3bya
H2O + CO2 + light — {CH2O} + O2
increased atmos. O2 content
decreased atmos. CO2 content
life evolved
3.5bya
age of mammals
Cenozoic, 66mya-present
age of ancient life
Paleozoic, 570-286mya
age of reptiles
Mesozoic, 245-144mya
how plate tectonics evolve atmosphere
new land mass– lots of weathering– CO2 sink– sediment reformation
parts of the atmosphere by altitude
Homosphere, heterosphere
Homosphere
altitude <80km
same relative proportion of gases everywhere
Heterosphere
altitude >80km stratified
concentration of heavier gases decreases more rapidly with height than concentration of lighter gases
proportions of gases in atmosphere (% volume)
N2 78% O2 21% Ar 1% CO2 0.04% trace gases: Ne, He, CH4, Kr, NO, H2, O3
variability of water vapour in atmosphere
polar regions «1% by volume
tropical regions up to 4%
concentrations of gases are measured in
‘dry atmosphere’
because water vapour is very variable around the world
peak UV absorption
stratopause
where weather occurs in the atmosphere
troposphere
divisions of the atmosphere
troposphere 0-10km
stratosphere 10-50km
mesosphere 50-85km
thermosphere
temperature profile of atmosphere
troposphere- declining
stratosphere- inclining
mesosphere- declining
thermosphere- increasing
Ozone
non uniform districution
concentrated 10-50km
absorbs harmful UV
depleted by CFCs- form polar stratospheric clouds
one dobson unit (DU)
27million molecules per cm^2
limit of ozone hole in southern hemisphere
220DU
drops to ~120DU in spring
aerosols
tiny liquid or solid particles of various compositions that are suspended in the atmosphere
reflect incoming solar radiation
aerosols important in
cloud formation- condensation nuclei- lead to cooling
colorful sunrises/sunsets
natural forms of aerosols
fires, loess, salt from breaking waves, pollen
anthropogenic aerosols
dust from agriculture tilling, construction, roads, ash from fires, volcanoes
sulphur oxides (SOx)
burning of sulfur based fossil fuels (mainly coal)- power generation, heating, steelmaking
nitrogen oxides (NOx)
high T combustion for power, transportation, heating
denitrification by soil bacteria
lightening, forest fires
volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
photochemically reactive hydrocarbons: xylene, toluene, isoprene, methyl butenol, methane, ethane, acetone
power generation, residential wood burning, gas vehicles, forest fires
Canadian human NOx sources
transportation 53%
oil/gas 19%
electric power 10%
Canadian human SOx sources
oil/gas 29%
mining/smelting 33%
electric power generation 25%
Canadian human VOC sources
transportation 31%
oil/gas 26%
general solvent use 12%
Canadian human aerosol sources
mining 17%
wood 10%
residential fuel/wood combustion 15%
cement/concrete 15%
Carbon monoxide (CO)
colourless, odourless, toxic gas, low T combustion of carbon fuels
aluminum, steel, pulp, paper, wood-burning, transportation, incineration
Canadian human sources of CO
transportation 76%
fuel wood combustion 7%
low temperature combustion
imperfect
greenhouse gases
H2O, CO2, CH4, N2O, O3, CFCs, PFCs, HFCs, HCFCs, SF6
significance of greenhouse gas
not determined solely by relative abundance
small change in CH4 more important than same change in CO2
O3 in troposphere
caused by pollution, short lived, toxic
HCFCs
replaced CFCs, dont harm O3 but do cause warming
weather
state of the atmosphere at a particular time and place
climate
the statistics of weather, likelihood of occurrence of a particular weather event
can’t attribute a single event to climate change
climate is a statistic
increase in mean of climate
graph shifts right
more hot weather, more record hot weather, less cold weather
increase in variance of climate
graph ‘flattens’ out-platykurtic
more hot/cold weather
more record hot/cold weather
increase in mean and variance of climate
graph shifts right and flattens much more hot weather more record hot weather not a lot of change in cold weather little-no record cold weather
graphs/statistics of climate, what we know
we know that the mean is shifting, changes in variance are harder to predict
vulnerability
degree to which a system is susceptible to and unable to cope with adverse effects of climate change, including climate variability and extremes
resiliency
the ability of social/ecological system to absorb disturbances while retaining same basic structure/functioning, capacity for self-organization and capacity to adapt to stress/change
adaptation
initiative/measures to reduce vulnerability of natural/human systems against climate change effects
adaptive capacity
whole of capabilities, resources, and institutions of a country/region to implement effective adaptation measures
mitigation
implementation of policies to reduce greenhouse gas emission and enhance sinks
mitigative capacity
country ability to reduce anthropogenic greenhouse gas emission or enhance natural sinks
what is earths primary source of energy
the sun- drives atmosphere and ocean
water vapour from satellite
bright white at equator- tropics, convection
mid latitude cyclones
wavelength
crest to crest
trough to trough
electromagnetic spectrum
gamma <0.001µm X-ray 0.001-.5µm UV ~.5µm visible .4-.7µm infrared ~1000µm microwaves ~1m radio 1-1000m
shortwave radiation
<1µm, gamma, X-rays, UV, visible
mostly blocked by atmosphere
UV, x-rays
ALL blocked by atmosphere
x-ray, gamma
longwave radiation
IR, microwaves, radio
>~1µm
speed of light
c = λ . v
visible light
violet 400nm blue green 500nm yellow orange 600nm red 700nm
law of conservation
energy can neither be created nor destroyed, can only be converted from one form to another
wave frequency
of crests/troughs that pass a given point in a period of time (Hz, 1/s)
c =
3.00 x 10^8 m/s
Radiation laws
- all known bodies emit em radiation
- Weinn’s displacement law
- Stefan-Boltzmann law
All known bodies emit electromagnetic radiation
at a given temperature black bodies absorb all radiation incident on it, at every λ, and emits all radiation at every λ maximally (theoretical)
Earth, sun are ~black bodies
Weinn’s displacement law
the λ of the most intense radiation is inversely proportional to the T of the object
increased T = decreased λ
max radiation λ- max λ emitted - more energetic
Weinns displacement law equation
λmax = Co / T
Co = 2.897x10^-3 km
λmax in µm (10^-6m)
Earth emits
infrared/longwave/terrestrial radiation
temperature of the sun
~6000ºC
hotter = smaller λ = higher v
the suns em spectrum
UV 7%
Visible light 44%
near IR 37%
far IR 11%
earth temperature
~15ºC
cool = long λ = low v
much less em radiation given off by earth than by sun
Stefan-Boltzmann law for blackbodies
The total energy radiated by a black body is proportional to the 4th power of its absolute temperature
Stefan-Boltzmann equation
E = sigma . T^4 sigma = 5.67x10^-8 W/m^2.K^4
global radiative equilibrium
total energy absorbed (insolation) = total energy emitted (outgoing IR)
earth radiative equilibrium
earth is not in radiative equilibrium
greenhouse gases trapping outgoing IR from leaving
solar altitude
angle of sun above the horizon
insolation
visible 45%
near IR 46%
UV 9%
weaker at poles- path is longer, has to travel through more atmos.- angle of inclination spreads incoming rays over larger area (weaker)
90º angle of inclination
1 unit incoming = 1 unit at surface
45º solar altitude
1/sin(45º) = 1.4
1 unit incoming is spread over 1.4 units at surface
30º solar altitude
1/sin(30º) = 2
1 unit incoming is spread over 2 units at surface
earth axial tilt
23.5º
day and night
rotation of earth on its axis ~1 every 24 hours
annual cycles
earth orbits the sun (in an ellipse) ~1 every 365.25 days
seasons result from
changing solar altitude
change in length of daylight
equinox
sun vertical at equator
M 21-22 Vernal (spring)
S 22-23 Autumnal
day and night 12hrs, everywhere
Solstice
sun vertical at 23.5º N/S
J 21-22 NH tilted towards sun
D 21-22 SH titled towards sun
daily path of the sun in NH mid latitudes
higher in sky in June, less to the south
lower in sky- more to the south, in December
never to the north
longest day of year in NH
Summer solstice
June 21
suns vertical rays at Tropic of Cancer
shortest day of year in NH
winter solstice
Dec. 21
suns vertical rays at Tropic of Capricorn
Milankovic
1930- Mathematical Climatology and the Astronomical Theory of Climatic Changes
eccentricity
obliquity
precession
Eccentricity
100,000yrs
changes in ellipsoid orbit
Obliquity
axial tilt, 41,100 years
21.5-24.5º
bigger tilt = intensified seasons
axial precession
wobble, 23,000 and 19,000 yrs
where N/S axis points
aphelion
farthest from sun
perihelion
closest to sun
why are poles cold in the summer if they get more insolation than equator
majority is reflected away by snow/ice - albedo
insolation more spread out
UVic earth system climate model parts
energy/moisture atmospheric model vegetation model land surface scheme ocean general circulation model sea ice model inorganic and organic carbon cycles marine sediment model
if we turn off emissions at 2013
if CO2 levels increased to 4.5º of warming– permafrost defrosts, strong + feedback, warming continues
ineffective science
science that is not effectively communicated
university research is funded
mostly by public funds
decision making
need evidence-based decision making
NOT decision-based evidence making
children act like scientists
they ask questions
seek to answer questions
communicating science
working with schools hosting school field trips public lectures writing for non-science audiences the media
what media are looking for in a story
Drama Certainty Brevity Personal immediacy Emotional/hot topic
drama
good narrative, conflict, david vs. goliath
certainty
clear, avoid innuendo, get facts straight
brevity
concise, pithy quotes, short, catchy
personal
provides individual perspective
immediacy
must be current, reader can form connection, current issues
emotional/hot topics
storms, cure for cancer, ebola
most effective tool in science communication
use of analogy or metaphor
reporters/general public don’t have scientific knowledge
“ingredients of the storm”
warm temperature, sea level rise
why it takes a long time for climate to equilibrate to a given level of radiative forcing
analogy with a pot of water on a stove
annual mean projections of future climate
2090-2099
prior to industrialization 1.8ºC globally warmer
track we are on now 4ºC globally warmer
do we owe the future anything?
intergenerational equity
Canadian voter turnout
overal ~60%
65-74 ~70-80%
18-24 ~40%
barriers to change
political, throne speech hipocritical
Oregon, Cali, Wash., refuse to ship oil, so BC decides to and then tries to push that LNG will replace coal in china?
problems with Humble Energy add
glacier problems were unknown at the time
America losing space race, cold war, company trying to push power, playing on American Power- defeat Soviets
Angus Reid Poll 2007
convinced global warming is occurring: canada 77%, BC 80%, Alberta 69%, Quebec 83%
may be occurring: canada 21%, BC 19%, Alberta 28%
not happening: canada 2%, BC 2%, Alberta 4%
Junk science
have an answer and build the case for it- biased evidence
US and Canadian poll 2008-2012
solid evidence of global warming- US 58%, Can. 80%
no evidence- US 26%, Can. 14%
Climate gate
fall/winter 2009- emails stolen and spread- lots of conspiracy
belief of global warming by demographic, US, spring
democrat- 69%
republican 41%
low ‘belief’ in republicans- media
belief of global warming by demographic, US, fall
democrat- 78%
republican- 47%
increase- extreme weather events, not-sure votes changing their minds
college degree little change, no degree big change- influenced by personal experience
issues with science journalism
scientists as communicators discourse in scientific discipline accuracy (sensationalism) who is an expert and who isn't journalistic balance - inadvertent journalistic bias
scientists as communicators
most scientists can’t communicate to the average person- they are not conducive to yes/no answers but media don’t report all the science
discourse in scientific discipline
if a scientific article is not your field, its hard to understand the jargon, and very hard to communicate it to the public- have to follow the things media wants + be true to the science
one small mistake can alter the science
accuracy
if not upheld, comes across as sensationalism
ie. statue of liberty drowning
who is an expert?
difficult to determine for general public- especially when papers publish articles in the science section that aren’t sound science
Journalistic balance
involves seeking out and reporting upon a variety of opinions associated with a news story
not biased- getting both sides of the story- this isn’t how it works in science, but is how it is done
problem with journalistic balance
inadvertent journalistic bias
journalists are supposed to give both sides of the story but this leads to giving a biased statement if there isn’t another side- in science there isn’t
contrasting pts. lead people to think there is uncertainty when there isn’t
how journalists obtain balance
microscale balance
macroscale balance
microscale balance
balance statement at the end
macroscale balance
equal column space for both opinions
Journalistic balance study of articles
Maxwell Boykoff, 2004
random sample of all articles on global warming
53% gave ~equal emphasis to human vs. natural reasons for global warming
35% focus on human causation but presented balanced view- included views of natural fluctuations
6% only suspicions of human contribution
94%- balanced/biased view
Journalistic balance study of news channels
Boycoff, 2008
6 news stations
70% of network news stories reported balanced coverage
Naomi Oreskes 2004 study
studied 928 articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals
no study disagreed with consensus view concerning role of greenhouse gases in causing global warming
Anderegg 2010 study
1372 publications
97-98% of climate researchers support IPCC findings
climate scientists who don’t believe climate change exists
their work still shows it does
ex. religious scientists who believe earth is robust
scientific method
observation stage: ask a question, observe/measure/describe
explanation/hypothesis stage: explain with theories
Prediction stage: use explanation to make prediction in another situation
experimental stage: conduct experiment to test prediction
if experimental stage fails
go back to explanation/hypothesis stage
if experimental stage succeeds
explanation/hypothesis stands
submitting a paper
1st review: 1% accepted, 50% major changes need, 20% minor, 30% rejected
final review: 63% accepted, 33% rejected, 5% withdrawn
scientific uncertainty
Aleatoric uncertainty
Epistemic uncertainty
Aleatoric uncertainty
irreducible- non-reversilbe, uncertainty can’t be reduced
ex. odds of rolling 2 6’s- ALWAYS 1/36
Epistemic uncertainty
reducible, uncertainty can be reduced by further research
can’t see details in a picture- zoom in
Scientists strive to reduce
epistemic uncertainty
uncertainties in climate predictions
uncertainty in climate feedbacks
uncertainty in future emissions scenarios (lots of aleatoric)
unknown unknowns
biggest uncertainty
cloud feedback
climate sensitivity
amount of T increase if you were to double CO2 in atmosphere
Obfuscating the public, 2002 US republican memo
need to continue to make the lack of scientific certainty a primary issue in the debate..
recruit experts sympathetic to your view..
challenge views by using professionals (scientists) not politicians..
scientific uncertainty is different than
policy/opinion uncertainty
manufactured grassroots organizations
astroturf organizations
ex. friends of science, swift boat veterans for truth
what do astroturf organizations do
issue press releases write letters to editor fill blogs with comments email reporters publish and disseminate reports from their 'experts'
media interest in global warming, 1997
major increase in Globe and Mail
kyoto- global plan, didn’t influence provincial
media interest in global warming, 2002
huge increase in Calgary news- ratification of kyoto- plans starting to be made provincially
media interest, 1988
first increase in interest, establishment of IPCC
Hansen Testimony
Canada hosts international climate conference
Heat waves, drought in US
media interest, 1990
IPCC first assessment report (FAR)
Canada’s green plan
media interest, 1992
supplementary report to IPCC
Rio Earth Summit
media interest, 1996
IPCC 2nd assessment report (SAR)
media interest, 2001
IPCC 3rd assessment report (TAR)
media interest, 2005
Hurricane Katrina
G8 meeting in Scotland
media interest, 2006
new global mean T record
Al Gore- inconvenient truth
media interest, 2007
interest sky rockets
IPCC 4th assessment (AR4)
Record Arctic sea ice melt back
Boycoff 2007
comparing US to UK for balance
UK has significantly higher coverage
UK- newspaper coverage is nearly always fact based
US- coverage isn’t mostly fact based till 2006
2009-2010 decrease in public belief
scientist emails stolen and uploaded to Russian server, posted on blogs
emails misunderstood
ex. ‘used a trick to solve something’
media interest in global warming 2007-2012
2007 was the highest, drop constantly after that- Immediacy- old news
Science in policy
science plays a crucial role in informing policy deliberations
science cannot prescribe policy outcomes
science can say what to expect, can’t decide what society should do
scientists responsibility
university scientists have responsibility to communicate results of, and respond to questions about their research to those who fund it (public)
public responsibility
education is crucial to successful democracy
demand better access to government science
Stephen Harpers rules controlling interviews with journalists
80% drop in media coverage of climate change science
IPCC established by
World Meteorological Organization