Enrolled Agent "Income" Flashcards
Enrolled Agent
Income reporting forms
Form 1099-MISC only when payments are made in the course of your trade or business. Personal payments are not reportable. You are engaged in a trade or business if you operate for gain or profit.
W2, 1099-C, 1099 G, 1099 NEC, 1099 R, Form 8606, 1099 S, 1099 INT, DIV or K1, SSA-1099, 1095-A
Above the line Deduction (For AGI)
Self-employment health insurance, student loan interest and form 1098-E
An eligible educator is a kindergarten through grade 12 teacher, instructor, counselor, principal, or aide who worked in a school for at least 900 hours during a school year.
Leslie teaches in the local high school and Roger teaches in the local community college. During 2023, Leslie spent $425 on supplies that were used in her classes and Roger spent $150 on supplies that were used in his classes. What are the maximum educator expenses that the couple can claim on their tax return if the couple files jointly in 2023?
Roger is not a qualified teacher.
A US Citizen living and working in Canada must report and pay all his or her income to the US.
Ted and William agreed to trade apartment buildings with Ted agreeing to pay William $10,000 cash. Ted’s basis in his apartment building is $40,000. William’s basis in his apartment building is $50,000. What is Ted’s basis in his new apartment building?
$50,000
Publication 544, page 16, provides a discussion on the basis of property received in a like-kind exchange. If the taxpayer acquires property in a like-kind exchange, the basis of that property is the same as the basis of the property transferred by the taxpayer.
In this case, Ted’s basis in the new building is $50,000, which is the sum of the basis of the old building given by Ted to William ($40,000) and the cash given by Ted to William ($10,000).
Publication 544
Page 16
When Amelia bought her first home in 2020, she paid $100,000 plus $1,000 closing costs. In 2021, she added a deck that cost $5,000. Then, in July 2023, a real estate dealer accepted her house as a trade-in and allowed her $125,000 (amount received as a trade-in) toward a new house priced at $200,000. How should Amelia report this transaction on her 2023 return?
The gain or loss on a sale or trade of property is found by comparing the amount realized with the adjusted basis of the property. In the case of a personal residence that is the primary one, a special rule applies whereby the taxpayer can exclude up to $250,000 per spouse of the gain on the sale of the main home if all of the following are true (see Publication 523, pages 2 and 3):
The taxpayer meets the ownership test (i.e., owned the home for at least 2 of the last 5 years).
The taxpayer meets the use test (i.e., lived in the main home for at least 2 of the last 5 years).
During the 2-year period ending on the date of the sale, the taxpayer did not exclude gain from the sale of another home.
Be aware that there are some exceptions in this area, which are covered more thoroughly in Publication 523, pages 3 through 6.
In this problem, the taxpayer satisfies the special rule for excluding $250,000. Thus, the gain from the sale is $19,000, which is the amount received as a trade-in of $125,000 less the property’s basis of $106,000 ($100,000 + $5,000 + $1,000). However, since the gain of $19,000 is less than the $250,000 exclusion amount, none of it is recognized. Furthermore, the sale of a taxpayer’s main home is not reported on the tax return unless the taxpayer has a gain and does not qualify to exclude all of it, the taxpayer has a gain and chooses not to exclude it, or the taxpayer received Form 1099-S (see Publication 523, page 15). Thus, Amelia does not report the sale of her main home.
Publication 523
Pages 2–6 and 15
A taxpayer purchases rental property for $160,000. She uses $25,000 cash and obtains a mortgage for $135,000. She pays closing costs of $10,000, which includes $5,000 in points on the mortgage and $5,000 for bank fees and title costs. Her initial basis in the property is:
$165,000.
Given the information above, the taxpayer in this problem has a basis of $165,000 from the purchase of the property. This basis is the sum of the property cost ($160,000 consisting of $25,000 in cash and $135,000 mortgage) and bank and title costs ($5,000).
Publication 551
Pages 2–3
Which of the following is true regarding a nonbusiness bad debt?
It is deductible as a short-term capital loss.
When a taxpayer lends money that afterwards cannot be collected, the taxpayer could have a bad debt, which may be deductible in the year the loan becomes uncollectible. For tax purposes there are two categories of bad debt: business and nonbusiness. Business bad debt is derived from the operations of the taxpayer’s trade or business and is deductible as a business loss. All other bad debts are regarded as nonbusiness and are deductible as short-term capital losses, regardless of how old the debt is.
Publication 550
Page 76
Joe and Jean purchased their primary residence in 2007 for $100,000. While they lived there, they made renovations at a cost of $125,000. They lived there until July 1, 2020. On June 15, 2023, the residence was sold for $800,000. From July 1, 2020, until June 15, 2023, the home was unoccupied. Joe and Jean file a joint return, and they have never excluded a gain from the sale of another home. What is their maximum taxable gain?
$75,000
In this problem, the taxpayers satisfy the special rule for excluding $500,000 of gain from the sale of a taxpayer’s main home. Thus, the gain from the sale is $75,000, which is the amount received of $800,000 less the property’s basis of $225,000 ($100,000 + $125,000), less the exclusion amount of $500,000.
Publication 523
Pages 3–6
Elton declared bankruptcy in the current year. Included in the liabilities discharged in the bankruptcy was a $15,000 personal loan Elton had received from his friend, Edward, 2 years ago. How would Edward treat this for tax purposes?
Short-term capital loss on Form 8949
Note: This is another example of a nonbusiness bad debt where it is unclear whether a genuine debtor-creditor relationship exists. Since there is no correct response if we assume there is no genuine debtor-creditor relationship, we are forced, in this case, to assume that one exists.
Publication 550
Pages 83 and 100
Form 8949
John made the following transfers during tax year 2023:
To his neighbor in the amount of $18,000
To his nephew in the amount of $14,000
To his uncle in the amount $18,000
All of the transfers are gifts that qualify for the annual exclusion. John files one Form 709 for tax year-end December 31, 2023. What is the total annual exclusion amount for gifts that will be listed on John’s 2023 Form 709 filing?
Generally, the federal gift tax applies to any transfer by gift of real or personal property, whether tangible or intangible, that is made directly or indirectly, in trust, or by any other means to a donee. However, a taxpayer is allowed an exclusion for a gift of a present interest to each donee. For 2023, the annual exclusion is $17,000.
Therefore, John’s annual exclusion amount for gifts listed on his 2023 Form 709 is $34,000, which is the exclusion allowable for the gift to his neighbor of $18,000 (limited to $17,000) and $18,000 (limited to $17,000) gift to his uncle. All of the gifts made during the calendar year to a donee are fully excluded under the annual exclusion if they are gifts of present interest and they total $17,000 or less (i.e., are not reported on Form 709). The total of the exclusions permitted for the two gifts that are reported on Form 709 is $34,000 ($17,000 + $17,000). The gift to his nephew was not more than $17,000, and therefore it is not included in the exclusion.
Mr. Smith and Mr. Jones own competing greenhouses. Mr. Smith has decided to focus exclusively on flower plants and Mr. Jones exclusively on vegetable plants. They agree to swap Mr. Smith’s inventory of vegetable plants for Mr. Jones’ inventory of flower plants. Which of the following statements is correct?
This transaction is not a like-kind exchange.
Beginning after December 31, 2017, section 1031 like-kind exchange treatment applies only to exchanges of real property held for use in a trade or business or for investment, other than real property held primarily for sale. (Instructions for Form 8824, page 1)
Generally, if you exchange business or investment real property solely for business or investment real property of a like kind, section 1031 provides that no gain or loss is recognized. If, as part of the exchange, you also receive other (not like-kind) property or money, gain is recognized to the extent of the other property and money received, but a loss isn’t recognized.
In this case, the investments of flower plants are stock in trade and as such are not real property and do not qualify for like-kind treatment.
Instructions for Form 8824
Page 1
Pat is the 100% shareholder of a corporation. He did not pay himself any salary or any dividends during 2023 from the corporation, thus there may not be any taxable income for him from the corporation. However, which of the following transactions could result in a constructive distribution for Pat and thus taxable income to him from the corporation?
A loan from the corporation to Pat at a zero-interest rate
Publication 542, page 17, provides that a corporate distribution to a shareholder is generally treated as a distribution of earnings and profits. Any part of a distribution from either current or accumulated earnings and profits is reported to the shareholder as a dividend. Any part of a distribution that is not from earnings and profits is applied against and reduces the adjusted basis of the stock in the hands of the shareholder.
There are, however, certain transactions between corporations and shareholders that may be treated as distributions (also known as constructive distributions), hence taxable dividend income if there is enough earnings and profits (see page 17 of Publication 542):
Below-market loans
Corporation cancels shareholder’s debt
Transfers of property to shareholder for less than fair market value (FMV)
Unreasonable rents
Unreasonable salaries
To recharacterize a contribution from a Roth IRA that was made in 2022 back to a traditional IRA in 2023, you must do the following:
Recharacterizing: A taxpayer may be able to treat a contribution made to 1 type of IRA as having been made to a different type of IRA
A trustee-to-trustee transfer by October 15, 2023, including the income earned, if any.
In order to recharacterize a contribution, the contribution and any net income allocable to the contribution must be transferred from the first IRA (the one to which it was made) to the second IRA in a trustee-to-trustee transfer. If the transfer is made by the due date (including extensions) for the taxpayer’s tax return for the year during which the contribution was made, an election to treat the contribution as having been originally made to the second IRA instead of to the first IRA can be made.
A conversion of a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA, and a rollover from any other eligible retirement plan to a Roth IRA, made in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, cannot be recharacterized as having been made to a traditional IRA.
In this case, the contribution made to the Roth IRA is not a conversion; hence, it can be recharacterized by October 15, 2023.
Karen, who is single, paid $150,000 for her residence in January 2018 and lived in it until January 2022. She then moved away and rented her home from February 2022 until she sold it in August 2023 for $240,000. While it was rental property, she deducted $20,000 of depreciation. What amount of gain on the sale of her residence is excludable from income?
$90,000
The gain or loss on a sale or trade of property is found by comparing the amount realized with the adjusted basis of the property. In the case of a personal residence that is the primary one, a special rule applies whereby the taxpayer can exclude up to $250,000 per spouse of the gain on the sale of the main home if all of the following are true.
The taxpayer meets the ownership test (i.e., own the home for at least 2 of the last 5 years).
The taxpayer meets the use test (i.e., lived in the main home for at least 2 of the last 5 years).
During the 2-year period ending on the date of the sale, the taxpayer did not exclude gain from the sale of another home. (Publication 523, page 3)