Enquiry 3 How Successful Is The Management Of Tectonic Hazards And Disasters? Flashcards
Tectonic disaster trends and patterns
Global scale
Deaths have decreased and economic losses have increased
International aid and preparedness= less people are affected
Number of tectonic disasters have fluctuated (peak 2000 and low in 2012)
Estimated that hydro-meteorological hazards and human induced disasters caused more fatalities than tectonic disasters (due to slow onset)
Mega disasters
Large scale- areal/spatial
VEI6 eruption
Weeks/months after = global supply chain disrupted
Years later= climate effects in areas 10,000km away
EYJAFJ eruption Global effects= imports/exports into Europe effected by air travel shutdown Car manufacturing (Nissan plant stop cube production)
Disaster statistics
Statistics hard to collect
Particularly in rural/remote of LHD countries (Kashmir)
Declaration of disaster deaths may be subject to political bias (2004 tsunami played down for tourism)
Direct/indirect deaths (associated diseases/subsequent hazards)
Since 1960s
Rapid urbanisation
Increased vulnerability
Squatter settlements
1980 $10b
2010 $350b
Prediction and forecasting (volcanoes)
Thermal imaging (Mt St. Helens bulge 1980)
Earthquake/Lamar sensors
Satellite surveying cameras
Prediction and forecasting (seismic gap)
Records movements
Predicts relative size/frequency of earthquakes in given area
Prediction and forecasting (earthquakes)
Tiltometers (changes in mountain shape as magma moves)
Seismometers (still into plate and out sensors)
Prediction and forecasting (tsunamis)
Time depends on proximity to epicentre
Early warning stations (deep ocean)
Pressure sensors seabed (height/speed)
Sensor send data to tsunami centre
Issues warning (3 minute in Japan)
Hazard management cycle
Hazard
Rescue (aid to keep people alive)
Relief
Rebuilding
Rehabilitation (rebuild infrastructure)
Mitigation (acts to reduce scale of next disaster)
Prevention
Preparation (death toll reduced when prepared)
Warning (community education/building resilience)
Parks model
Different hazard events have different impacts so vary in duration, speed and destruction of quality of life
Relief (weeks) immediate response/ saving lives/ teams from outside area
Rehabilitation last several months to restore physical/community structures
Reconstruction permanent changed to restore quality of life
Modify the event
Land use zoning (safe to build infrastructure) prevents development in high value land
Hazard resistant design (invest construction which have safety designs) high costs for tall
Engineering defences (tsunami wall) v high cost
Diversion of lava flows (spray seawater to cool and solidify flow- mount Etna) only low vei basaltic
KEY PLAYERS- engineers/ scientists/ planners
Modify resilience and vulnerability
Hi tech monitoring (international satellites monitor changes in earth)
Prediction -changes in volcanic shape/ low mag earthquakes
Education- teach communities about hazards
Community preparedness- earthquake drills and alarms
Community actions and strong governmental policies improve capacity to cope
Modify loss
Short term emergency aid- reduce death toll : high cost/technical difficulty
Insurance- recover economically : does not save lives
Multiple hazard zone
No of physical hazards combine
Taiwan has 4
Japan has 4
May be recovering from one when another hits
Multiple hazard zone (Californian coast)
Drought 2008-11 & 2012-15
Earthquakes (san Andreas) usually shallow
Volcanoes (cascades subduction zone)
Last time 100+ died in disaster 1933