Enquiry 2 Why Do Some Tectonic Hazards Develop Into Disasters Flashcards
Disaster
When hazard affects human well-being
Dregs disaster model suggests a disaster only happens when a hazardous event meets a vulnerable population
Vulnerability
How susceptible a population is to damage caused by a hazard
Capacity to cope/ resilience is how well a population can recover from a disaster
Risk
Likelihood of humans being affected by a hazard
Risk= hazard x vulnerability/ capacity to cope
Qatar has lowest disaster risk 0.1%
Philippines has highest 27.5% out of 170 countries
Impacts of disaster
Vary according to level of development
Turkey and Kashmir has similar sized earthquakes 1999 and 2015
Kashmir 75000 deaths
Turkey 18000
Kashmir mountainous with poor access to service/infrastructure
Richer= high financial loss Poorer= severe shocks to community wellbeing & diseases
Relationship between risk/hazards/people
Unpredictability- timing/ magnitude caught out
Russian roulette response- acceptance (fatalistic)
CBA- benefits of hazard outweigh risks
Dynamic hazards- human influence can increase frequency/ magnitude
Lack of alternatives
Resilience
Degree to which community has necessary resources and is capable or organising itself prior to and during time of event
Pressure and release model
Proposed what should be tackled if the risk of a disaster is to be reduced
ROOT CAUSES ideologies and political systems
DYNAMIC PRESSURES macro-forces (deforestation/ rapid urbanisation)
UNSAFE CONDITIONS vulnerable society
NATURAL HAZARD volcano erupt
Vulnerability can be physical/economic/social
Haiti (VULNERABILITY)
12th jan 2010
Richter 7
Killed 200,000
70% live less than $2 day
86% in Port au Prince love steep slope slums
Unstable gov
1.5m homeless
Cholera epidemic 6900 deaths
2015 still recovering
Lack of coordination meant aid ships were turned away
Gov strengthen for 2013 hurricane
Hazard events in developing and developed
DEVELOPED (infrequent disasters/ low vulnerability)
Low birth rate
Large cities
Independence
DEGRADING ENVIRO
DEVELOPING (frequent disasters/ high vulnerability)
High birth rate
Dependence
Megacities
Earthquakes and tsunamis in contrasting locations 2004-2013
Very high human development
Affected 4,010,000
Killed 21,036
Low human development
Affected 9,495,000
Killed 29,7328
Hazard profiles
Magnitude
Speed of onset
Duration
Frequency
Spatial probability
Hazard profile challenges
difficult to compare across hazards
Each treated as unique and own mitigation technique
Hazard planning strategy- cost conflicts/ gov unwilling to pay
Highest risk
High mag and low frequency
Least expected
Rapid onset and low spatial prob without warning
VEI
volcanic explosivity
Calculated from:
Height of eruption cloud
Ejecta of eruption (volume of products)
logarithmic
Richter scale
Measure amplitude of waves produced by earthquake
0-9
Absolute scale
Mercalli scale
Measures experienced impacts of earthquake
Relative scale (different amount of shaking)
I-xii