English Assessment Term 4 Year 9 Flashcards
Memorise
Traditionally, individuals relied upon the certainties of Medieval Providentialism
to determine their fate.
The emergence of Humanist ideals, however, challenged this established world view
and instead encouraged individuals to exercise their own free will
William Shakespeare’s tragic play Julius Caesar explores the shifting ideological struggle arising
from the transition from Medieval to Renaissance values, through a dramatisation of the turbulent Roman governmental structure, to advocate for a mediation between extreme agency and the reliance on traditional authority structures.
Conceived as a response to the sociopolitical tensions of the late Elizabethan era
and the anxieties engendered by the imminent death of a monarch.
Shakespeare dramatises the fall of the Roman Republic as an allegory for
the tyranny of egregious political change and revolution.
Cassius’ resentment toward Caesar’s tyranny encapsulated in the simile
describing him “like a colossus.”
Coupled with the juxtaposition of the members of the Senate who are reduced to
“petty men” left to “walk under his legs and peep about.”
This positions Cassius as a Machiavellian archetype
advocating the need to temper authority centralised on a single individual.
Shakespeare exposes Cassius’ unscrupulous nature through a representation of
his propensity for artifice.
Cassius’ rhetorical questions asking “why his name should be sounded more than yours” as he
implores Brutus to consider the metaphorical “weight” of his name, asserting “it is as heavy.”
This allows Shakespeare to act as a mouthpiece for
orthodox monarchs who saw individualism as a corrosive element in the Elizabethan era.
These ambitions coalesce in Cassius’ capacity for self-serving machinations and
his willingness to shape political narratives to align with personal motivation.
Affirming himself as the prototypical Renaissance man, Cassius’ allusion to the Divine Right of Kings
suggesting “men at some time are masters of their own fate,” refutes the traditional belief in providentialism.
Cassius advocates for personal agency in the face of tyranny
mimetic of Renaissance Humanist ideals.
In a new world order defined by self-determination, individuals are empowered to enact
their own subjective justice.